Dataset Information

Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: Network meta-analysis (NMA) has become an increasingly used tool to compare multiple treatments simultaneously by synthesizing direct and indirect evidence in clinical research. However, many existing studies did not properly report the evidence of treatment comparisons and show the comparison structure to audience. In addition, nearly all treatment networks presented only direct evidence, not overall evidence that can reflect the benefit of performing NMAs. This article classifies treatment networks into three types under different assumptions; they include networks with each treatment comparison's edge width proportional to the corresponding number of studies, sample size, and precision. In addition, three new measures (ie, the effective number of studies, the effective sample size, and the effective precision) are proposed to preliminarily quantify overall evidence gained in NMAs. They permit audience to intuitively evaluate the benefit of performing NMAs, compared with pairwise meta-analyses based on only direct evidence. We use four case studies, including one illustrative example, to demonstrate their derivations and interpretations. Treatment networks may look fairly differently when different measures are used to present the evidence. The proposed measures provide clear information about overall evidence of all treatment comparisons, and they also imply the additional number of studies, sample size, and precision obtained from indirect evidence. Some comparisons may benefit little from NMAs. Researchers are encouraged to present overall evidence of all treatment comparisons, so that audience can preliminarily evaluate the quality of NMAs.

SUBMITTER: Lin L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6235692 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta-analysis.

Lin Lifeng L

Statistics in medicine 20180718 28

Network meta-analysis (NMA) has become an increasingly used tool to compare multiple treatments simultaneously by synthesizing direct and indirect evidence in clinical research. However, many existing studies did not properly report the evidence of treatment comparisons and show the comparison structure to audience. In addition, nearly all treatment networks presented only direct evidence, not overall evidence that can reflect the benefit of performing NMAs. This article classifies treatment net ...[more]

PMID: 30019428

Similar Datasets

Project description:Preventing psychosis in patients at clinical high risk may be a promising avenue for pre-emptively ameliorating outcomes of the most severe psychiatric disorder. However, information on how each preventive intervention fares against other currently available treatment options remains unavailable. The aim of the current study was to quantify the consistency and magnitude of effects of specific preventive interventions for psychosis, comparing different treatments in a network meta-analysis. PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and unpublished/grey literature were searched up to July 18, 2017, to identify randomized controlled trials conducted in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis, comparing different types of intervention and reporting transition to psychosis. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Data were synthesized using network meta-analyses. The primary outcome was transition to psychosis at different time points and the secondary outcome was treatment acceptability (dropout due to any cause). Effect sizes were reported as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sixteen studies (2,035 patients, 57% male, mean age 20.1 years) reported on risk of transition. The treatments tested were needs-based interventions (NBI); omega-3?+?NBI; ziprasidone?+?NBI; olanzapine?+?NBI; aripiprazole?+?NBI; integrated psychological interventions; family therapy?+?NBI; D-serine?+?NBI; cognitive behavioural therapy, French & Morrison protocol (CBT-F)?+?NBI; CBT-F?+?risperidone?+?NBI; and cognitive behavioural therapy, van der Gaag protocol (CBT-V)?+?CBT-F?+?NBI. The network meta-analysis showed no evidence of significantly superior efficacy of any one intervention over the others at 6 and 12 months (insufficient data were available after 12 months). Similarly, there was no evidence for intervention differences in acceptability at either time point. Tests for inconsistency were non-significant and sensitivity analyses controlling for different clustering of interventions and biases did not materially affect the interpretation of the results. In summary, this study indicates that, to date, there is no evidence that any specific intervention is particularly effective over the others in preventing transition to psychosis. Further experimental research is needed.

Project description:Genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions (GENREs) are valuable tools for understanding microbial metabolism. The process of automatically generating GENREs includes identifying metabolic reactions supported by sufficient genomic evidence to generate a draft metabolic network. The draft GENRE is then gapfilled with additional reactions in order to recapitulate specific growth phenotypes as indicated with associated experimental data. Previous methods have implemented absolute mapping thresholds for the reactions automatically included in draft GENREs; however, there is growing evidence that integrating annotation evidence in a continuous form can improve model accuracy. There is a need for flexibility in the structure of GENREs to better account for uncertainty in biological data, unknown regulatory mechanisms, and context-specificity associated with data inputs. To address this issue, we present a novel method that provides a framework for quantifying combined genomic, biochemical, and phenotypic evidence for each biochemical reaction during automated GENRE construction. Our method, Constraint-based Analysis Yielding reaction Usage across metabolic Networks (CANYUNs), generates accurate GENREs with a quantitative metric for the cumulative evidence for each reaction included in the network. The structuring of CANYUNs allows for the simultaneous integration of three data inputs while maintaining all supporting evidence for biochemical reactions that may be active in an organism. CANYUNs is designed to maximize the utility of experimental and annotation datasets and to ultimately assist in the curation of the reference datasets used for the automatic construction of metabolic networks. We validated CANYUNs by generating an E. coli K-12 model and compared it to the manually curated reconstruction iML1515. Finally, we demonstrated the use of CANYUNs to build a model by generating an E. coli Nissle CANYUNs model using novel phenotypic data that we collected. This method may address key challenges for the procedural construction of metabolic networks by leveraging uncertainty and redundancy in biological data.

Dataset Information

Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta-analysis.

Publications

Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets