Dataset Information

Risk factors of colistin safety according to administration routes: Intravenous and aerosolized colistin.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Nephrotoxicity of intravenous (IV) colistin has impeded its clinical use; aerosolized (AS) colistin may be an alternative, but safety data are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and risk factors associated with IV and AS colistin administration.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed in a tertiary referral hospital. Data were collected before and after colistin administration between October 2012 and April 2016. Exclusion criteria were as follows: age less than 18 years, previous colistin administration, concurrent use of IV and AS colistin, dialysis before colistin use, and colistin use for less than 3 days. We compared AKI incidence following administration of IV versus AS colistin and analyzed risk factors for colistin-associated nephrotoxicity.

Results

A total of 464 patients were enrolled (n = 311, IV group; n = 153, AS group). Incidence of AKI was significantly higher in the IV group (IV vs AS, 20.26% vs 7.84%, p-value < 0.001). Duration of colistin use (OR 1.033, 95% CI 1.009-1.058, p-value 0.008) and presence of chronic kidney disease (OR 2.710, 95% CI 1.348-5.448, p-value 0.005) were associated with nephrotoxicity. There were no significant risk factors associated with AS colistin.

Conclusions

Although AS colistin was not associated with any significant risk factors for nephrotoxicity, duration of colistin use and baseline kidney function may affect AS colistin-associated nephrotoxicity.

SUBMITTER: Min KL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6248982 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Risk factors of colistin safety according to administration routes: Intravenous and aerosolized colistin.

Min Kyoung Lok KL Son Eun Sun ES Kim Jae Song JS Kim Soo Hyun SH Jung Sun Mi SM Chang Min Jung MJ

PloS one 20181121 11

<h4>Background</h4>Nephrotoxicity of intravenous (IV) colistin has impeded its clinical use; aerosolized (AS) colistin may be an alternative, but safety data are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and risk factors associated with IV and AS colistin administration.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective study was performed in a tertiary referral hospital. Data were collected before and after colistin administration between October 2012 and April 20 ...[more]

PMID: 30462703

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesIntravenous iron therapy for chronic anemia management is largely driven by dosing protocols that differ in intensity with respect to dosing approach (i.e., dose, frequency, and duration). Little is known about the safety of these protocols.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsUsing clinical data from a large United States dialysis provider linked to health care utilization data from Medicare, we constructed a cohort of patients with ESKD aged ≥65 years who initiated and continued center-based hemodialysis for ≥90 days between 2009 and 2012, and initiated at least one of the five common intravenous iron administration strategies; ranked by intensity (the amount of iron given at moderate-to-high iron indices), the order of strategies was 3 (least intensive), 2 (less intensive), 1 (reference), 4 (more intensive), and 5 (most intensive). We estimated the effect of continuous exposure to these strategies on cumulative risks of mortality and infection-related events with dynamic Cox marginal structural models.ResultsOf 13,249 eligible patients, 1320 (10%) died and 1627 (12%) had one or more infection-related events during the 4-month follow-up. The most and least commonly initiated strategy was strategy 2 and 5, respectively. Compared with the reference strategy 1, more intensive strategies (4 and 5) demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality (e.g., most intensive strategy 5: 60-day risk difference: 1.3%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.8% to 2.1%; 120-day risk difference: 3.1%; 95% CI, 1.0% to 5.6%). Similarly, higher risks were observed for infection-related morbidity and mortality among more intensive strategies (e.g., strategy 5: 60-day risk difference: 1.8%; 95% CI, 1.2% to 2.6%; 120-day risk difference: 4.3%; 95% CI, 2.2% to 6.8%). Less intensive strategies (2 and 3) demonstrated lower risks of all-cause mortality and infection-related events.ConclusionsAmong dialysis patients surviving 90 days, subsequent intravenous iron administration strategies promoting more intensive iron treatment at moderate-to-high iron indices levels are associated with higher risks of mortality and infection-related events.

Project description:During the present time, anti-microbial features of copper (Cu) and zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (NPs) are extensively used to combat the growth of pathogenic microbes. CuNPs and ZnONPs are recurrently used in cosmetics, medicine and food additives, and their potential for toxic impacts on human and ecosystem is of high concern. In this study, the fate and toxicity of 16- to 96-nm-ranged biosynthesized copper (Bio-CuNPs) and zinc oxide (Bio-ZnONPs) was assessed in male Wistar rats. In vivo exposures of the two nanoparticles are achieved through two different administration routes namely, intraperitoneal (i/p) and intravenous (i/v) injections. The three different concentrations, no observable adverse effect concentration (NOAEC), inhibitory concentration (IC50) and total lethal concentration (TLC), were appraised at the dose range of 6.1 to 19.82 ?g/kg and 11.14 to 30.3 ?g/kg for Bio-CuNPs and Bio-ZnONPs respectively, for both i/p and i/v routes on 14th and 28th day of observation. These dose ranges are considered based on the previous study of antibacterial dose on multidrug-resistant pathogenic bacteria. In this study, we investigated the toxic effect of Bio-CuNPs and Bio-ZnONPs on animal behaviour, animal mass, haematologic indices, organ indices and histopathology of liver, spleen, kidney and brain organs. We found that i/v and i/p administration of Bio-ZnONPs in three different doses did not cause mortality and body weight was slightly reduced up to second week of administration compared with the vehicle control group. At the dose ranges of 11-16 ?g/kg (i/v) and 24-30 ?g/kg (i/p), no significant changes were observed in the serum creatinine level as well as serum ALT, serum AST level and ALP level which were 40.7 mg/dl, 37.9 IU/L and 82.4 IU/L normal as compared to vehicle control on 14th and 28th day of observation. These findings are confirmed in liver, kidney and spleen indices and histopathology studies. Furthermore, liver and kidney injury occurred when the concentrations of Bio-CuNPs were at 9.5 ?g/kg (IC50) and 11.7 ?g/kg (TLC) for i/v route of administration. Similarly, increase in serum ALT (67.7 mg/dl), AST level (70 IU/L) and ALP (128 IU/L) was also observed. And the body weight was significantly lower than in the control group after 14th day, and there were statistically significant differences observed by this route; interestingly, the toxicity of Bio-CuNPs in serum is prolonged (up to 28th day). Effect of Bio-CuNPs through i/p route was considerably low as compare to the control. Results of the present study revealed that Bio-ZnONPs have no effect on kidney and liver function biomarkers (both i/v and i/p) as compared to Bio-CuNPs. Graphical abstract As shown in graphical abstract (Fig. 1), our aim is to assess the toxicity of Bio-CuNPs and Bio-ZnONPs through in vivo protocol. According to Kahru and Dubourguier reviews, AgNPs, CuNPs and ZnONPs have been historically used as biocides, for preventing the growth of microorganisms and algae (Kahru and Dubourguier 2010). Therefore, as like pesticides, nanomaterials should be monitored for their toxic response toward non-target species, including humans and animals. To gain a better understanding whether the accidental release of metal-containing NPs may pose a threat to non-target species, assessing of toxic effect is indispensable.The 'non-target organism' is an organism which will be exposed to NPs after their incidental release into the environment.

Project description:BackgroundUnderstanding how patients generate preferences for administration route alternatives may improve health-care delivery and clinical outcomes. Recently, novel biological therapies with subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration routes have been approved for severe uncontrolled asthma. The aim of our study was to assess the preferred route of biologic therapy administration and related beliefs among patients with severe uncontrolled asthma.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional observational survey study. Patients answered an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire after an outpatient visit in pulmonary disease clinics located throughout Italy. Socio-demographic and clinical information together with the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12), Work Productivity Impairment Scale and the medical resources utilization module of the Health & Work Survey were collected. Patients beliefs and preference towards SC and IV administration were investigated by means of an ad hoc 13 item questionnaire.Results the main findings150 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and completed the questionnaire (47.3% males). Preference for IV and SC administration was 18.7% and 81.3%, respectively. Compared with patients preferring SC formulation, patients that favored IV were older (p = 0.04), less likely to escalate corticosteroid dose (p = 0.03) and had emergency room (ER) access (p = 0.009) during asthma exacerbations. Patients felt that SC was more convenient than IV, but this belief was not associated with higher likelihood of preferring SC administration. IV formulations were more likely associated with quicker and more effective drug action (p = 0.0001), procedural safety and medical oversight (p = 0.0002) and social support (p = 0.007). Predictors of IV preference were represented by the association of worse asthma control and increased use of ER services, and by beliefs toward formulation effectiveness/efficiency in reducing symptoms (p = 0.04 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The model achieved excellent discrimination of administration route preference (area under the curve = 0.87).ConclusionsPreference is guided by partially misleading beliefs, which may generate wrong expectations that in turn can affect treatment satisfaction and adherence. Convenience and efficacy beliefs for drugs with different routes of administration always should be discussed with patients to achieve informed shared-decision making.Trial registrationNot applicable.

Dataset Information

Risk factors of colistin safety according to administration routes: Intravenous and aerosolized colistin.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Risk factors of colistin safety according to administration routes: Intravenous and aerosolized colistin.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets