Dataset Information

Effect and Safety of Meropenem-Vaborbactam versus Best-Available Therapy in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: The TANGO II Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections are limited and CRE infections remain associated with high clinical failure and mortality rates, particularly in vulnerable patient populations. A Phase 3, multinational, open-label, randomized controlled trial (TANGO II) was conducted from 2014 to 2017 to evaluate the efficacy/safety of meropenem-vaborbactam monotherapy versus best available therapy (BAT) for CRE.

Methods

A total of 77 patients with confirmed/suspected CRE infection (bacteremia, hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia, complicated intra-abdominal infection, complicated urinary tract infection/acute pyelonephritis) were randomized, and 47 with confirmed CRE infection formed the primary analysis population (microbiologic-CRE-modified intent-to-treat, mCRE-MITT). Eligible patients were randomized 2:1 to meropenem-vaborbactam (2 g/2 g over 3 h, q8h for 7-14 days) or BAT (mono/combination therapy with polymyxins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, tigecycline; or ceftazidime-avibactam alone). Efficacy endpoints included clinical cure, Day-28 all-cause mortality, microbiologic cure, and overall success (clinical cure + microbiologic eradication). Safety endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and laboratory findings.

Results

Within the mCRE-MITT population, cure rates were 65.6% (21/32) and 33.3% (5/15) [95% confidence interval (CI) of difference, 3.3% to 61.3%; P = 0.03)] at End of Treatment and 59.4% (19/32) and 26.7% (4/15) (95% CI of difference, 4.6% to 60.8%; P = 0.02) at Test of Cure;.Day-28 all-cause mortality was 15.6% (5/32) and 33.3% (5/15) (95% CI of difference, - 44.7% to 9.3%) for meropenem-vaborbactam versus BAT, respectively. Treatment-related AEs and renal-related AEs were 24.0% (12/50) and 4.0% (2/50) for meropenem-vaborbactam versus 44.0% (11/25) and 24.0% (6/25) for BAT. Exploratory risk-benefit analyses of composite clinical failure or nephrotoxicity favored meropenem-vaborbactam versus BAT (31.3% [10/32] versus 80.0% [12/15]; 95% CI of difference, - 74.6% to - 22.9%; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Monotherapy with meropenem-vaborbactam for CRE infection was associated with increased clinical cure, decreased mortality, and reduced nephrotoxicity compared with BAT.

Clinical trials registration

NCT02168946.

Funding

The Medicines Company.

SUBMITTER: Wunderink RG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6249182 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:There has been a worldwide increase in infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Meropenem-vaborbactam, a carbapenem antibiotic and novel boronic acid-based beta-lactamase inhibitor, is a fixed-dose combination product with potent in vitro activity against Enterobacteriaceae that are Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase producers. Meropenem-vaborbactam has been studied in two Phase III trials, Targeting Antibiotic Non-susceptible Gram-negative Organisms (TANGO)-I and TANGO-II. TANGO-I was a multicenter, international Phase III, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-control trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem-vaborbactam for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection, including acute pyelonephritis. Among patients with complicated urinary tract infection and growth of a baseline pathogen, meropenem-vaborbactam was determined to be superior to piperacillin-tazobactam based on the composite outcome of symptom improvement or resolution and microbial eradication at the end of intravenous therapy. TANGO-II was a multicenter, international, Phase III, randomized, prospective, open-label, comparative trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of meropenem-vaborbactam vs best available therapy for CRE infections. Treatment with meropenem-vaborbactam resulted in higher rates of clinical cure at the end of therapy (64.3%vs 33.3%, P=0.04). Additionally, 28-day all-cause mortality was 17.9% in the meropenem-vaborbactam group compared to 33.3% in the best available therapy group, a relative risk reduction of 46.5% (P=0.03). In addition to meropenem-vaborbactam, three other agents with activity against CRE are in late-stage development: imipenem-relebactam, plazomicin, and cefiderocol. The data from Phase II and III studies will help to further define the role of these agents. Overall, the recent approval of meropenem-vaborbactam and the active pipeline for other agents with broad Gram-negative activity are encouraging developments on the CRE therapeutic front.

Project description:The activities of meropenem-vaborbactam and comparators against 152 (1.1%) carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) isolates identified among 13,929 Enterobacterales isolates collected from U.S. hospitals during 2016 to 2018 were evaluated. CRE rates were higher in the Middle Atlantic census division (3.5%) than in the other divisions (range, 0.0% for the West North Central division to 1.4% for the West South Central division). Among the CRE isolates, 134 carried carbapenemase genes, and these included 72 isolates carrying blaKPC-3, 51 isolates carrying blaKPC-2, 4 isolates carrying blaNDM-1, 3 isolates carrying blaSME-4, 2 isolates carrying blaVIM-1, 1 isolate carrying blaOXA-232, and 1 isolate carrying blaKPC-4 Meropenem-vaborbactam was active against 95.4% of the CRE isolates and 94.8% of the carbapenem-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) isolates when applying the CLSI breakpoints. All isolates producing serine carbapenemases were inhibited by meropenem-vaborbactam at ≤8 mg/liter. One Citrobacter freundii isolate carrying blaKPC-3 had a meropenem-vaborbactam MIC of 8 mg/liter and was resistant according to CLSI breakpoints (the isolate was susceptible when the EUCAST criterion of an MIC of ≤8 mg/liter for susceptible was applied), had disrupted OmpC and OmpF sequences, and overexpressed AcrAB-TolC. All carbapenemase-negative CRE isolates (n = 18) were inhibited by meropenem-vaborbactam at ≤4 mg/liter, and the MIC values of this combination ranged from 0.25 to 4 mg/liter. Among 7 isolates carrying metallo-β-lactamases and/or oxacillinases with carbapenemase activity, meropenem-vaborbactam susceptibility was 14.3% and 57.1% when applying CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints, respectively. CRE isolates were resistant to many comparator agents, and the most active agents were tigecycline, colistin, and amikacin (to which 63.2% to 96.7% of the isolates were susceptible). Understanding the epidemiology of CRE isolates in U.S. hospitals and the resistance mechanisms among these isolates is important to form guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by these organisms, which have high mortality rates.

Project description:Carbapenems are considered as last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. With the increasing use of carbapenems in clinical practice, the emergence of carbapenem-resistant pathogens now poses a great threat to human health. Currently, antibiotic options for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are very limited, with polymyxins, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and aminoglycosides as the mainstays of therapy. The need for new and effective anti-CRE therapies is urgent. Here, we describe the current understanding of issues related to CRE and review combination therapeutic strategies for CRE infections, including high-dose tigecycline, high-dose prolonged-infusion of carbapenem, and double carbapenem therapy. We also review the newly available antibiotics which have potential in the future treatment of CRE infections: ceftazidime/avibactam, which is active against KPC and OXA-48 producers; meropenem/vaborbactam, which is active against KPC producers; plazomicin, which is a next-generation aminoglycoside with in vitro activity against CRE; and eravacycline, which is a tetracycline class antibacterial with in vitro activity against CRE. Although direct evidence for CRE treatment is still lacking and the development of resistance is a concern, these new antibiotics provide additional therapeutic options for CRE infections. Finally, we review other potential anti-CRE antibiotics in development: imipenem/relebactam and cefiderocol. Currently, high-dose and combination strategies that may include the new ?-lactam/?-lactamase inhibitors should be considered in severe CRE infections to maximize treatment success. In the future, when more treatment options are available, therapy for CRE infections should be individualized and based on molecular phenotypes of resistance, susceptibility profiles, disease severity, and patient characteristics. More high-quality studies are needed to guide effective treatment for infections caused by CRE.