Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Patient Self-Reported Adherence to Ritonavir-Boosted Darunavir Combined With Either Raltegravir or Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine in the NEAT001/ANRS143 Trial.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The NEAT001/ANRS143 trial demonstrated noninferiority of ritonavir-boosted darunavir combined with either raltegravir (RAL + DRV/r) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC + DRV/r) in HIV-positive, antiretroviral-naive adults. In post hoc analyses, however, RAL + DRV/r showed inferiority in patients with baseline CD4 <200/mm and HIV-1 RNA ?100,000 copies per milliliter. This preplanned ancillary study was conducted to assess whether differences in adherence might explain efficacy results. SETTING:Phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter study in 15 European countries (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01066962). METHODS:Seven hundred seventy-four participants self-reported adherence (modified AIDS Clinical Trials Group questionnaire) over 96 weeks [383 RAL + DRV/r (twice daily; 5 pills/day), 391 TDF/FTC + DRV/r (once daily; 4 pills/day)]. Primary endpoint was ?95% versus <95% adherence to prescribed doses recorded (1) over the last 4 days or (2) on the visual analogue scale over the last 30 days. RESULTS:Characteristics, except age, were similar between arms; 9% had CD4 <200 cells/mm and HIV-1 RNA ?100,000 copies per milliliter. Adherence ?95% in the last 4 days (P = 0.029) or at the visual analogue scale (P = 0.0072) was higher with TDF/FTC + DRV/r than with RAL + DRV/r. Adherence ?95% over the last 4 days was associated with lower probability of virological failure (P = 0.015). Adherence in patients with baseline CD4 <200 cells/mm and HIV-1 RNA ?100,000 copies per milliliter was similar to the rest of the population, and not significantly associated with efficacy measures, with no significant differences between arms. CONCLUSION:Adherence was high and slightly better in the TDF/FTC + DRV/r than in the RAL + DRV/r arm. No convincing evidence was found that higher failure rate in the RAL + DRV/r arm in the subgroup with worse baseline viroimmunological status is caused by adherence differences.

SUBMITTER: Ammassari A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6250251 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Patient Self-Reported Adherence to Ritonavir-Boosted Darunavir Combined With Either Raltegravir or Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate/Emtricitabine in the NEAT001/ANRS143 Trial.

Ammassari Adriana A   Stöhr Wolfgang W   Antinori Andrea A   Molina Jean-Michel JM   Schwimmer Christine C   Domingo Pere P   Thalme Anders A   Di Pietro Massimo M   Wallet Cedrick C   Pozniak Anton A   Richert Laura L   Raffi François F  

Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) 20181201 4


<h4>Background</h4>The NEAT001/ANRS143 trial demonstrated noninferiority of ritonavir-boosted darunavir combined with either raltegravir (RAL + DRV/r) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC + DRV/r) in HIV-positive, antiretroviral-naive adults. In post hoc analyses, however, RAL + DRV/r showed inferiority in patients with baseline CD4 <200/mm and HIV-1 RNA ≥100,000 copies per milliliter. This preplanned ancillary study was conducted to assess whether differences in adherence mig  ...[more]

Similar Datasets