Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Does Delayed Restoration Improve Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Protocols to Calcium Silicate-Based Cements?


ABSTRACT: The purpose of the present study was to assess the proper time to perform a restoration (immediately or delayed) after placement of two calcium silicate-based cements (CSCs) and to test the performance of two different restorative protocols regarding shear bond strength (SBS). Seventy-five acrylic blocks were randomly divided into five groups (n = 15). Specimens were filled with either ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental) or Biodentine (Septodont). The restoration was performed at an immediate (12 min) or delayed (seven days) timeframe, using a resin-based flowable composite (SDR) (bonded to the CSC using a universal bonding system) or glass ionomer cement (GIC) as restorative materials. SBS was measured using a universal testing machine. Fractured surfaces were evaluated, and the pattern was registered. Statistical analysis was performed using the Dunn?Sidak post hoc test (P < 0.05). Biodentine/immediate SDR showed the highest mean SBS value (4.44 MPa), with statistically significant differences when compared to mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)/GIC (1.14 MPa) and MTA/immediate SDR (1.33 MPa). MTA/GIC and MTA/immediate SDR did not present significant differences regarding SBS. No statistical differences were verified concerning mean SBS between both CSCs within the 7 day groups. MTA/delayed SDR (3.86 MPa) presented statistical differences compared to MTA/immediate SDR, whereas no differences were observed regarding Biodentine performance (Biodentine/immediate SDR and Biodentine/delayed SDR (3.09 MPa)). Bonding procedures directly on top of MTA might be preferably performed at a delayed timeframe, whereas Biodentine might allow for immediate restoration.

SUBMITTER: Palma PJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6265959 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Does Delayed Restoration Improve Shear Bond Strength of Different Restorative Protocols to Calcium Silicate-Based Cements?

Palma Paulo J PJ   Marques Joana A JA   Falacho Rui I RI   Vinagre Alexandra A   Santos João Miguel JM   Ramos João Carlos JC  

Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 20181108 11


The purpose of the present study was to assess the proper time to perform a restoration (immediately or delayed) after placement of two calcium silicate-based cements (CSCs) and to test the performance of two different restorative protocols regarding shear bond strength (SBS). Seventy-five acrylic blocks were randomly divided into five groups (<i>n</i> = 15). Specimens were filled with either ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental) or Biodentine (Septodont). The restoration was performed at an immed  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9760150 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10066686 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11368412 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3995854 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5549579 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5553423 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7273418 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10259441 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10053114 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9106484 | biostudies-literature