Dataset Information

Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Among Women.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Although lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), its contribution to prediction remains controversial. OBJECTIVES:This study examined the association and clinical utility of Lp(a) with incident CVD in women. METHODS:A turbidimetric assay assessed Lp(a) in 3 cohorts of women (the WHS [Women's Health Study] [N = 24,558], a case-cohort sample from the WHI [Women's Health Initiative] Observational Study [n = 1,815 cases, subcohort n = 1,989], and the JUPITER [Justification for Use of Statins in Prevention] trial [n = 2,569]) and in men from JUPITER (n = 5,161). A WHS derivation sample (n = 16,400) determined the form of association with incident CVD. This was tested in WHS validation data (n = 8,158) and the other study samples. Models including traditional CV risk factors but with and without Lp(a) were compared using risk reclassification. RESULTS:In the WHS, there was a curvilinear association, with increased CVD risk among those with Lp(a) >50 mg/dl, but only among women with total cholesterol (TC) >220 mg/dl. In the WHS test sample, there was a small but significant change in the C-statistic (0.790 to 0.797; p = 0.035) but no improvement in measures of reclassification. This pattern was replicated among women in the WHI and JUPITER trial. In contrast, there was a strong association of Lp(a) with CVD among men with low TC levels in JUPITER. CONCLUSIONS:In 3 cohorts of women, Lp(a) was associated with CVD only among those with high TC, and improvement in prediction was minimal. These data have implications for Lp(a) in clinical practice among women and for trials of Lp(a)-lowering agents.

SUBMITTER: Cook NR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6277983 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Among Women.

Cook Nancy R NR Mora Samia S Ridker Paul M PM

Journal of the American College of Cardiology 20180709 3

<h4>Background</h4>Although lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), its contribution to prediction remains controversial.<h4>Objectives</h4>This study examined the association and clinical utility of Lp(a) with incident CVD in women.<h4>Methods</h4>A turbidimetric assay assessed Lp(a) in 3 cohorts of women (the WHS [Women's Health Study] [N = 24,558], a case-cohort sample from the WHI [Women's Health Initiative] Observational Study [n = 1,815 cases, subco ...[more]

PMID: 30012322

Similar Datasets

Project description:Lipoprotein(a) is a highly heritable biomarker independently associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). It is unclear whether measured lipoprotein(a) or genetic factors associated with lipoprotein(a) can provide comparable or additional prognostic information for primary prevention. To determine whether a genetic risk score (GRS) comprising 43 variants at the LPA gene, which encodes apolipoprotein(a), has clinical utility in assessing ASCVD risk compared with and in addition to lipoprotein(a) measurement. The UK Biobank is a prospective observational study of approximately 500 000 volunteers aged 40 to 69 years who were recruited from 22 sites across the United Kingdom between 2006 and 2010. Using externally derived weights, an LPA GRS was calculated for 374 099 unrelated individuals with array-derived genotypes and lipoprotein(a) measures. Data were analyzed from April 2020 to March 2020. Measured lipoprotein(a) and LPA GRS. We estimated the associations between measured lipoprotein(a) and LPA GRS with the incidence of ASCVD (peripheral arterial disease, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and cardiovascular mortality) using Cox proportional hazards models. To determine the utility of using measured lipoprotein(a) and LPA GRS as risk enhancers for ASCVD, we assessed the potential improvement in ASCVD risk discrimination by QRISK3 and Pooled Cohort Equations among individuals with borderline to intermediate risk (n = 113 703 and 144 350, respectively). The mean age of the overall study population was 57.6 years, and 204 355 individuals were female (54.6%). During a median follow-up of 11.1 years (interquartile range, 1.4 years), 15 444 individuals developed an incident ASCVD event (5.1%). The LPA GRS explained approximately 60% of the variation in measured lipoprotein(a) for White/European individuals. Independently, both lipoprotein(a) and LPA GRS were associated with incident, composite ASCVD (hazard ratio per 120 nmol/L increase, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.23-1.28 vs hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.26-1.33; P < .001). The association between LPA GRS and ASCVD was substantially attenuated after adjusting for measured lipoprotein(a). Adding measured lipoprotein(a) or LPA GRS to QRISK3 provided modest improvements to the risk discrimination of incident ASCVD events (area under the receiver operating curve, 0.640; 95% CI, 0.633-0.647 vs 0.642; 95% CI, 0.635-0.649 for both; P = .005 and P = .01, respectively). When indicated, cardiovascular risk assessment with lipoprotein(a) at middle-age may include direct measurement or an LPA GRS.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has a strong relationship with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), few studies have examined whether NT-proBNP adds to risk prediction algorithms, particularly in women.ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate the relationship between NT-proBNP and incident CVD in women.MethodsUsing a prospective case-cohort within the WHI (Women's Health Initiative) observational study, we selected 1,821 incident cases of CVD (746 myocardial infarctions, 754 ischemic strokes, 160 hemorrhagic strokes, and 161 other cardiovascular [CV] deaths) and a randomly selected reference cohort of 1,992 women without CVD at baseline.ResultsMedian levels of NT-proBNP were higher at study entry among incident cases (120.3 ng/l [interquartile range (IQR): 68.1 to 219.5 ng/l]) than among control subjects (100.4 ng/l [IQR: 59.7 to 172.6 ng/l]; p < 0.0001). Women in the highest quartile of NT-proBNP (≥140.8 ng/l) were at 53% increased risk of CVD versus those in the lowest quartile after adjusting for traditional risk factors (1.53 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21 to 1.94]; p for trend <0.0001). Similar associations were observed after adjustment for Reynolds Risk Score covariables (1.53 [95% CI: 1.20 to 1.95]; p for trend <0.0001); the association remained in separate analyses of CV death (2.66 [95% CI: 1.48 to 4.81]; p for trend <0.0001), myocardial infarction (1.39 [95% CI: 1.02 to 1.88]; p for trend = 0.008), and stroke (1.60 [95% CI: 1.22 to 2.11]; p for trend <0.0001). When added to traditional risk covariables, NT-proBNP improved the c-statistic (0.765 to 0.774; p = 0.0003), categorical net reclassification (0.08; p < 0.0001), and integrated discrimination (0.0105; p < 0.0001). Similar results were observed when NT-proBNP was added to the Reynolds Risk Score.ConclusionsIn this multiethnic cohort of women with numerous CV events, NT-proBNP modestly improved measures of CVD risk prediction.

Project description:Background Conventional "low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)" assays measure cholesterol content in both low-density lipoprotein and lipoprotein(a) particles. To clarify the consequences of this methodological limitation for clinical care, our study aimed to compare associations of "LDL-C" and corrected LDL-C with risk of cardiovascular disease and to assess the impact of this correction on the classification of patients into guideline-recommended LDL-C categories. Methods and Results Lipoprotein(a) cholesterol content was estimated as 30% of lipoprotein(a) mass and subtracted from "LDL-C" to obtain corrected LDL-C values (LDL-Ccorr30). Hazard ratios for cardiovascular disease (defined as coronary heart disease, stroke, or coronary revascularization) were quantified by individual-patient-data meta-analysis of 5 statin landmark trials from the Lipoprotein(a) Studies Collaboration (18 043 patients; 5390 events; 4.7 years median follow-up). When comparing top versus bottom quartiles, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular disease was significant for "LDL-C" (1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.31; P=0.005) but not for LDL-Ccorr30 (1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.22; P=0.362). In a routine laboratory database involving 531 144 patients, reclassification of patients across guideline-recommended LDL-C categories when using LDL-Ccorr30 was assessed. In "LDL-C" categories of 70 to <100, 100 to <130, 130 to <190, and ?190 mg/dL, significant proportions (95% CI) of participants were reassigned to lower LDL-C categories when LDL-Ccorr30 was used: 30.2% (30.0%-30.4%), 35.1% (34.9%-35.4%), 32.9% (32.6%-33.1%), and 41.1% (40.0%-42.2%), respectively. Conclusions "LDL-C" was associated with incident cardiovascular disease only when lipoprotein(a) cholesterol content was included in its measurement. Refinement in techniques to accurately measure LDL-C, particularly in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) levels, is warranted to assign risk to the responsible lipoproteins.

Dataset Information

Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Among Women.

Publications

Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Among Women.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets