Dataset Information

Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study.

ABSTRACT: Background:The phase III ALEX study in patients with treatment-naive advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its primary end point of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib. Here, we present detailed central nervous system (CNS) efficacy data from ALEX. Patients and methods:Overall, 303 patients aged ?18?years underwent 1:1 randomization to receive twice-daily doses of alectinib 600?mg or crizotinib 250?mg. Brain imaging was conducted in all patients at baseline and every subsequent 8?weeks. End points (analyzed by subgroup: patients with/without baseline CNS metastases; patients with/without prior radiotherapy) included PFS, CNS objective response rate (ORR), and time to CNS progression. Results:In total, 122 patients had Independent Review Committee-assessed baseline CNS metastases (alectinib, n?=?64; crizotinib, n?=?58), 43 had measurable lesions (alectinib, n?=?21; crizotinib, n?=?22), and 46 had received prior radiotherapy (alectinib, n?=?25; crizotinib, n?=?21). Investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib was consistent between patients with baseline CNS metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.64] and those without (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.80, P interaction = 0.36). Similar results were seen in patients regardless of prior radiotherapy. Time to CNS progression was significantly longer with alectinib versus crizotinib and comparable between patients with and without baseline CNS metastases (P?

SUBMITTER: Gadgeel S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6290889 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study.

Gadgeel S S Peters S S Mok T T Shaw A T AT Kim D W DW Ou S I SI Pérol M M Wrona A A Novello S S Rosell R R Zeaiter A A Liu T T Nüesch E E Balas B B Camidge D R DR

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology 20181101 11

<h4>Background</h4>The phase III ALEX study in patients with treatment-naive advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its primary end point of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib. Here, we present detailed central nervous system (CNS) efficacy data from ALEX.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Overall, 303 patients aged ≥18 years underwent 1:1 randomization to receive twice-daily doses of alectinib 600 mg o ...[more]

PMID: 30215676

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:This is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib. Patients and methods:ALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600?mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500?mg/m2 or docetaxel 75?mg/m2, both every 3?weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Results:Altogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n?=?72; chemotherapy, n?=?35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6?months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9-12.2] with alectinib and 1.4?months (95% CI: 1.3-1.6) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08-0.29); P?<?0.001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib [HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17-0.59); median PFS was 7.1?months (95% CI: 6.3-10.8) with alectinib and 1.6?months (95% CI: 1.3-4.1) with chemotherapy]. In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n?=?24; chemotherapy, n?=?16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P?<?0.001). Grade ?3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1?weeks versus 6.0?weeks). Conclusion:Alectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750.

Dataset Information

Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study.

Publications

Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure