Dataset Information

Change in Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer with Treatment Advances: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: Background:Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment has changed substantially over time, but we do not know whether survival post-metastasis has improved at the population level. Methods:We searched for studies of MBC patients that reported survival after metastasis in at least two time periods between 1970 and the present. We used meta-regression models to test for survival improvement over time in four disease groups: recurrent, recurrent estrogen (ER)-positive, recurrent ER-negative, and de novo stage IV. We performed sensitivity analyses based on bias in some studies that could lead earlier cohorts to include more aggressive cancers. Results:There were 15 studies of recurrent MBC (N?=?18 678 patients; 3073 ER-positive and 1239 ER-negative); meta-regression showed no survival improvement among patients recurring between 1980 and 1990, but median survival increased from 21 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 18 to 25) months to 38 (95% CI = 31 to 47) months from 1990 to 2010. For ER-positive MBC patients, median survival increased during 1990-2010 from 32 (95% CI = 23 to 43) to 57 (95% CI = 37 to 87) months, and for ER-negative MBC patients from 14 (95% CI = 11 to 19) to 33 (95% CI = 21 to 51) months. Among eight studies (N?=?35 831) of de novo stage IV MBC, median survival increased during 1990-2010 from 20 (95% CI = 16 to 24) to 31 (95% CI = 24 to 39) months. Results did not change in sensitivity analyses. Conclusion:By bridging studies over time, we demonstrated improvements in survival for recurrent and de novo stage IV MBC overall and across ER-defined subtypes since 1990. These results can inform patient-doctor discussions about MBC prognosis and therapy.

SUBMITTER: Caswell-Jin JL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6305243 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Change in Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer with Treatment Advances: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Caswell-Jin Jennifer L JL Plevritis Sylvia K SK Tian Lu L Cadham Christopher J CJ Xu Cong C Stout Natasha K NK Sledge George W GW Mandelblatt Jeanne S JS Kurian Allison W AW

JNCI cancer spectrum 20181101 4

<h4>Background</h4>Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment has changed substantially over time, but we do not know whether survival post-metastasis has improved at the population level.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched for studies of MBC patients that reported survival after metastasis in at least two time periods between 1970 and the present. We used meta-regression models to test for survival improvement over time in four disease groups: recurrent, recurrent estrogen (ER)-positive, recurrent ER-neg ...[more]

PMID: 30627694

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors + endocrine therapy (ET) prolonged progression-free survival as first- or second-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer prognosis. Given the recent publication of overall survival (OS) data for the 3 CDK4/6-inhibitors, we performed a meta-analysis to identify a more precise and reliable benefit from such treatments in specific clinical subgroups.MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search to select all available phase II or III randomized clinical trials of CDK4/6-inhibitors + ET reporting OS data in first- or second-line therapy of HR+/HER2-negative pre- or postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer. A random effect model was applied for the analyses. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2statistic. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the effect of study-level factors. The project was registered in the Open Science Framework database (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TNZQP).ResultsSix studies were included in our analyses (3421 patients). A clear OS benefit was observed in patients without (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54 to 0.85, I2 = 0.0%) and with visceral involvement (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.65 to 0.89, I2 = 0.0%), with at least 3 metastatic sites (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.94, I2 = 11.6%), in an endocrine-resistant (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.93, I2 = 0.0%) and sensitive subset (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.61 to 0.88, I2 = 0.0%), for younger than 65 years (HR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.95, I2 = 0.0%) and 65 years or older (HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.95, I2 = 44.4%), in postmenopausal (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.86, I2 = 0.0%) and pre- or perimenopausal setting (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.96, I2 = 0.0%) as well as in chemotherapy-naïve patients (HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.55 to 0.93, I2 = 0.0%).ConclusionsCDK4/6-inhibitors + ET combinations compared with ET alone improve OS independent of age, menopausal status, endocrine sensitiveness, and visceral involvement and should be preferred as upfront therapy instead of endocrine monotherapy.

Project description:BackgroundAlthough various clinical trials and real-life studies have tried to explore the value of nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel remain unclear which need to be systematically evaluated.MethodsElectronic searches for prospective clinical trials evaluating nab-paclitaxel monotherapy for MBC were performed. Requisite data were extracted, integrated and analysed from the included studies according to the different study designs using systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were further performed to explore the potential risk factors affecting each individual outcome of interest following nab-paclitaxel monotherapy.ResultsTwenty-two studies with 3287 MBC patients were included. A total of 1685 MBC patients received nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy, 640 patients as further-line therapy, and 962 patients as mixed-line therapy. A total of 1966 MBC patients (60.40%) received nab-paclitaxel weekly, 1190 patients (36.56%) received nab-paclitaxel triweekly and 99 patients (3.04%) received nab-paclitaxel biweekly. The overall incidence rates of all-grade neutropenia, leukopenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and fatigue were 52% (95% CI, 38-66%, I2 = 98.97%), 58% (95% CI, 43-73%, I2 = 97.72%), 58% (95% CI, 48-68%, I2 = 97.17%), and 49% (95% CI, 41-56%, I2 = 94.39%), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% (95% CI, 35-45%, I2 = 98.97%), and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 66% (95% CI, 59-73%, I2 = 98.97%) following nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.64 months (95% CI, 6.89-8.40 months, I2 = 92.3%), and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.51 months (95% CI, 21.25-27.78 months, I2 = 92.7%). Treatment line, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(Her-2)-negative status and dosage were found to be sources of heterogeneity among the included studies. According to the meta-regression and subgroup analysis, grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred less frequently in Her-2-negative patients than in the entire population (P = 0.046). Patients who received first-line nab-paclitaxel monotherapy showed a higher ORR (P = 0.006) and longer PFS (P = 0.045). Efficacy outcomes were not affected by the administration schedule. However, within the same schedule, patients appeared to have a superior ORR (P = 0.044) and longer PFS (P = 0.03) with an increasing dosage of nab-paclitaxel administered.ConclusionsThe benefits brought by nab-paclitaxel mono-chemotherapy in the treatment of MBC are considerable while the harm is generally manageable. Further study and validation are needed to figure out the roles which the dosage, schedule and other factors play actually in nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy.

Dataset Information

Change in Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer with Treatment Advances: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Publications

Change in Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer with Treatment Advances: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets