Dataset Information

Templates of Lymph Node Dissection for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

ABSTRACT: Background: The role of lymph node dissection (LND) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. Notably, the conflicting evidence on the benefits and harms of LND is inherently linked to the lack of consensus on both anatomic templates and extent of lymphadenectomy. Herein, we provide a detailed overview of the most commonly dissected templates of LND for RCC, focusing on key anatomic landmarks and patterns of lymphatic drainage. Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was performed without time filters in July 2018 in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement recommendations. The primary endpoint was to summarize the most commonly dissected templates of LND according to the side of RCC. Results: Overall, 25 studies were selected for qualitative analysis. Of these, most were retrospective. The LND template was heterogeneous across studies. Indications and extent of LND were either not reported or not standardized in most series. The most commonly dissected template for right-sided tumors included hilar, paracaval, and precaval nodes, with few authors extending the dissection to the inter-aortocaval, retrocaval, common iliac or pre/paraaortic nodes. Similarly, the most commonly dissected template for left-sided tumors encompassed the renal hilar, preaortic and paraaortic nodes, with few authors reporting a systematic dissection of inter-aortocaval, retro-aortic, common iliac, or para-caval nodes. Conclusions: In light of the unpredictable renal lymphatic anatomy and the evidence from available prospective mapping studies, the extent of the most commonly dissected templates might be insufficient to catch the overall anatomic pattern of lymphatic drainage from RCC.

SUBMITTER: Campi R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6306033 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Templates of Lymph Node Dissection for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Campi Riccardo R Sessa Francesco F Di Maida Fabrizio F Greco Isabella I Mari Andrea A Takáčová Tána T Cocci Andrea A Fantechi Riccardo R Lapini Alberto A Serni Sergio S Carini Marco M Minervini Andrea A

Frontiers in surgery 20181219

<b>Background:</b> The role of lymph node dissection (LND) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is controversial. Notably, the conflicting evidence on the benefits and harms of LND is inherently linked to the lack of consensus on both anatomic templates and extent of lymphadenectomy. Herein, we provide a detailed overview of the most commonly dissected templates of LND for RCC, focusing on key anatomic landmarks and patterns of lymphatic drainage. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review of the English-lan ...[more]

PMID: 30619877

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, investigating the role of lymph node dissection (LND) during nephroureterectomy (NU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); focussing on survival and complication outcomes.MethodsA comprehensive systematic search was completed using a combination of Medical Subject Headings terms and keywords related to UTUC and LND on multiple databases. Meta-analyses were performed when outcomes were reported under the same definition in two or more studies. Where meta-analysis was not possible, outcomes were reviewed in a narrative manner.ResultsA total of 21 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 11 cohort studies in the quantitative analysis. Our review did not detect significant improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-1.92), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.54-1.46) and overall survival (OS) (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93-1.30). However, when focussing on studies only including patients with pT2/pT3 UTUC, not performing LND significantly worsened RFS (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.72-4.66). Reports of removing more than eight lymph nodes may also provide prognostic benefits in pN0 patients. The performance of LND was not associated with a higher rate of postoperative complications (risk ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.13).ConclusionOverall, LND did not provide additional benefit in RFS, CSS and OS. However, there was a potential benefit in RFS in patients with muscle-invasive and advanced UTUC. LND was also not associated with increased risks of postoperative complications.Abbreviations: CIS: carcinoma in situ; CSS: cancer-specific survival; HR: hazard ratio; LND: lymph node dissection; NU: nephroureterectomy; OS: overall survival; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RFS: recurrence-free survival; RoB, risk of bias; RR: risk ratio; (UT)UC: (upper tract) urothelial carcinoma.

Project description:IntroductionThe benefit of lymph node dissection (LND) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains poorly defined. Despite this uncertainty, the American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on localized renal cancer recommends that LND be performed for staging purposes when there is suspicion of regional lymphadenopathy on imaging. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we sought to determine how much of a departure the new AUA guideline is from current practice. We hypothesized that practice patterns would reflect the "Expert Opinion" recommendation and that patients who are clinical lymph node (cLN) positive would receive a LND more often than those who are cLN negative. Additionally, we sought to determine factors that would trigger a LND as well the accuracy of clinical staging by examining the relationship between cLN and pathologic lymph node (pLN) status of patients who received a LND.Materials and methodsThe NCDB was queried for patients with nonmetastatic RCC who underwent partial nephrectomy or nephrectomy from 2010 to 2014. Patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were extracted. Frequency distributions were calculated for patients with both cLN and pLN status available. Of patients who received a LND, sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) of cLN status for pLN positivity were calculated. Logistic regression models were used to examine association between clinical and socioeconomic factors and receipt of LND. Propensity score matching was used in sensitivity analyses to examine potential for reporting bias in NCDB data.ResultsWe identified 110,963 patients who underwent surgery for RCC, of whom 11,867 (11%) had LND performed at the time of surgery. cLN and pLN information were available in 11,300 patients, of which 1,725 were preoperatively staged as having positive cLN. More LNDs were performed per year for patients who were cLN negative than cLN positive. Of patients who received a LND, the majority of patients were cLN negative across all clinical T (cT) stages. Multivariable analysis showed that all patients who had care at an academic/research institution (odds ratio [OR]: 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43-1.74) and had to travel >12.5 to 31.0 miles and >31.0 miles to a treatment center (OR: 1.08, 95%CI: 1.01-1.15 and OR: 1.28, 95%CI: 1.20-1.36, respectively) were more likely to get a LND. As cT stage increased from cT2-4, the risk of LND increased (OR range: 4.7-7.90, respectively). Patients who were cLN positive were more likely to receive a LND at the time of surgery (OR: 18.68, 95%CI: 16.62-21.00). Of the patients who received a LND, clinical staging was more specific than sensitive.ConclusionMore patients received a LND who were cLN negative compared to patients who were cLN positive. Patients who were cLN positive were more likely to receive a LND. Treatment center type, distance to treatment center, cT stage, and cLN positivity were factors associated with LND receipt.

Dataset Information

Templates of Lymph Node Dissection for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Publications

Templates of Lymph Node Dissection for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets