Dataset Information

Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute's nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data.

ABSTRACT: The National Cancer Institute's (NCI) wear time classification algorithm uses a rule based on the occurrence of physical activity data counts-a cumulative measure of movement, influenced by both magnitude and duration of acceleration-to differentiate between when a physical activity monitoring (PAM) device (ActiGraph accelerometer) is being worn by a participant (wear) from when it is not (nonwear). It was applied to PAM data generated from the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2003-2004). We discuss two corner case conditions that can produce unexpected, and perhaps unintended results when the algorithm is applied. We show, using simulated data of two special cases, how this algorithm classifies a 24-hour period with only 72 total counts as 100% wear in one case, and classifies a 24-hour period with 96,000 counts as 0.1% wear in another. The prevalence of like scenarios in the NHANES 2003-2004 PAM dataset is presented with corresponding summary statistics for varying degrees of the algorithm's nonwear classification threshold (T). The number of participants with valid days, defined as 10 or more hours classified as wear time in a 24-hour day, increased while the mean counts-per-minute (CPM) decreased as the threshold for excluding non-wear was reduced from the allowed 4,000 counts in an hour. The number of participants with four or more valid days increased 2.29% (n = 113) and mean CPM dropped 2.45% (9.5 CPM) when adjusting the nonwear classification threshold to 50 counts an hour. Applying the most liberal criteria, only excluding hours as nonwear which contained 1 count or less, resulted in a 397 more participants (7.83% increase) and 26.5 fewer CPM (6.98% decrease) in NHANES 2003-2004 participants with four or more valid days. The algorithm should be used with caution due to the potential influence of these corner cases.

SUBMITTER: Moore HE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6312247 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute's nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data.

Moore Hyatt E HE Haydel K Farish KF Banda Jorge A JA Fiterau Madalina M Desai Manisha M Robinson Thomas N TN

PloS one 20181231 12

The National Cancer Institute's (NCI) wear time classification algorithm uses a rule based on the occurrence of physical activity data counts-a cumulative measure of movement, influenced by both magnitude and duration of acceleration-to differentiate between when a physical activity monitoring (PAM) device (ActiGraph accelerometer) is being worn by a participant (wear) from when it is not (nonwear). It was applied to PAM data generated from the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination ...[more]

PMID: 30596771

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSome accelerometer studies ask participants to document in a daily log when the device was worn. These logs are used to inform the window of consecutive days to extract from the accelerometer for analysis. Logs can be missing or inaccurate, which can introduce bias in the data. To mitigate this bias, we developed a simple computer algorithm that used data within the accelerometer to identify the window of consecutive wear days. To evaluate the algorithm's performance, we compared how well it agreed to the window of days identified by visual inspection and participant logs.FindingsParticipants were older women (mean age 79 years) in a cohort study that aimed to examine the relationship of objective physical activity on cardiovascular health. The study protocol requested that participants wear an accelerometer 24 h per day over nine calendar days (to capture seven consecutive wear days) and to complete daily logs. A stratified sample with (n = 75) and without (n = 100) participant logs were selected. The Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health (OPACH) algorithm was applied to the accelerometer data to identify a window of up to seven consecutive wear days. Participant logs documented dates the device was first put on, worn, and removed. Using pre-established guidelines, two independent raters visually reviewed the accelerometer data and characterized the dates representing up to seven consecutive days of 24-h wear. Average agreement level between the two raters was 90%. The percent agreement was compared between the three methods. The OPACH algorithm and visual inspection had 83% agreement in identifying a window with the same total number of days, if one or more shifts in calendar dates were allowed. For visual inspection vs. logs and algorithm vs. logs, this agreement was 81 and 74%, respectively.ConclusionThe OPACH algorithm can be efficiently and readily applied in large-scale accelerometer studies for the identification of a window of consecutive days of accelerometer wear. This algorithm was comparable to visual inspection and participant logs and might provide a quicker and more cost-effective alternative to selecting which data to extract from the accelerometer for analysis.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00000611.

Dataset Information

Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute's nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data.

Publications

Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute's nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets