Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy in chronic liver disease: a randomized comparison of 19-G FNA and 22-G FNB needles.


ABSTRACT: Background and study aims  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy uses a 19-gauge (G) needle for parenchymal liver biopsies. We evaluated tissue yields with a 22G fine-needle biopsy (FNB) versus 19G FNA fine-needle aspirate (FNA) device. Patients and methods  Biopsies were obtained from 20 patients using the 19G FNA and 22G FNB randomizing each in a cross-over fashion with a blinded outcome assessor. Tissue adequacy for histologic evaluation was the primary outcome, or the proportion of specimens obtaining pathologic diagnosis (portal structures ≥ 5 or length of the longest piece ≥ 15 mm). Additional secondary outcomes included portal and centrilobular inflammation/fibrosis, length of the longest piece, aggregate specimen length, and small (< 5 mm), medium (5 - 8 mm) and large (> 8 mm) fragments. Results were compared in a per needle basis. Patients with cirrhosis were excluded. Results  Eighty biopsies (40 each 19G FNA and 22G FNB) were obtained. Tissue adequacy was greater for the 19G FNA (88 %) versus 22G FNB (68 %), ( P  = 0.03). There was no difference in total portal structures for the 19G FNA (7.4) and 22G FNB (6.1), ( P  = 0.28). There was no difference in pre-processing outcomes. After processing, length of the longest piece was higher for the 19G FNA (9.1 mm) versus 22G FNB (6.6 mm), ( P  = 0.02). More total post-processing small fragments 29.9 versus 20.7, ( P  = 0.01) and fewer large fragments 1.0 versus 0.4 for the 22G FNB ( P  = 0.01) were detected. Conclusions  Tissue adequacy was higher for the 19G FNA versus 22G FNB needle. The 22G FNB needle produced samples more prone to fragmentation during specimen processing.

SUBMITTER: Mok SRS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6327728 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy in chronic liver disease: a randomized comparison of 19-G FNA and 22-G FNB needles.

Mok Shaffer R S SRS   Diehl David L DL   Johal Amitpal S AS   Khara Harshit S HS   Confer Bradley D BD   Mudireddy Prashant R PR   Kovach Alicia H AH   Diehl Mia M MM   Kirchner H Lester HL   Chen Zong-Ming E ZE  

Endoscopy international open 20190104 1


<b>Background and study aims </b> Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy uses a 19-gauge (G) needle for parenchymal liver biopsies. We evaluated tissue yields with a 22G fine-needle biopsy (FNB) versus 19G FNA fine-needle aspirate (FNA) device. <b>Patients and methods </b> Biopsies were obtained from 20 patients using the 19G FNA and 22G FNB randomizing each in a cross-over fashion with a blinded outcome assessor. Tissue adequacy for histologic evaluation was the primary outcome, or the propo  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4858215 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4830051 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8542287 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6257123 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4486032 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8573426 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10901641 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6773615 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5625867 | biostudies-other