The Role of Wound Care in 2 Group A Streptococcal Outbreaks in a Chicago Skilled Nursing Facility, 2015?2016.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Ahmed SS
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6334819 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
The Role of Wound Care in 2 Group A Streptococcal Outbreaks in a Chicago Skilled Nursing Facility, 2015‒2016.
Ahmed Sana S SS Diebold Kasey E KE Brandvold Jacob M JM Ewaidah Saadeh S SS Black Stephanie S Ogundimu Abimbola A Li Zhongya Z Stone Nimalie D ND Van Beneden Chris A CA
Open forum infectious diseases 20180626 7
Two consecutive outbreaks of group A <i>Streptococcus</i> (GAS) infections occurred from 2015-2016 among residents of a Chicago skilled nursing facility. Evaluation of wound care practices proved crucial for identifying transmission factors and implementing prevention measures. We demonstrated shedding of GAS on settle plates during care of a colonized wound. ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:ObjectivesTo derive a risk prediction score for potential adverse outcomes in older adults transitioning to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) from the hospital.DesignRetrospective analysis.SettingMedicare Current Beneficiary Survey (2003-11).ParticipantsPreviously community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries who were hospitalized and discharged to SNF for postacute care (N=2,043).MeasurementsRisk factors included demographic characteristics, comorbidities, health status, hospital length of stay, prior SNF stays, SNF size and ownership, treatments received, physical function, and active signs or symptoms at time of SNF admission. The primary outcome was a composite of undesirable outcomes from the patient perspective, including hospital readmission during the SNF stay, long SNF stay (≥100 days), and death during the SNF stay.ResultsOf the 2,043 previously community-dwelling beneficiaries hospitalized and discharged to a SNF for post-acute care, 589 (28.8%) experienced one of the three outcomes, with readmission (19.4%) most common, followed by mortality (10.5%) and long SNF stay (3.5%). A risk score including 5 factors (Barthel Index, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, hospital length of stay, heart failure diagnosis, presence of an indwelling catheter) demonstrated very good discrimination (C-statistic=0.75), accuracy (Brier score=0.17), and calibration for observed and expected events.ConclusionOlder adults frequently experience potentially adverse outcomes in transitions to a SNF from the hospital; this novel score could be used to better match resources with patient risk.
| S-EPMC5992035 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Failure to reconcile medications across transitions in care is an important source of harm to patients. Little is known about medication discrepancies upon admission to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).To describe the prevalence of, type of medications involved in, and sources of medication discrepancies upon admission to the SNF setting.Cross-sectional study.Patients admitted to SNF for subacute care.Number of medication discrepancies, defined as unexplained differences among documented medication regimens, including the hospital discharge summary, patient care referral form and SNF admission orders.Of 2,319 medications reviewed on admission, 495 (21.3%) had a medication discrepancy. At least one medication discrepancy was identified in 142 of 199 (71.4%) SNF admissions. The discharge summary and the patient care referral form did not match in 104 of 199 (52.3%) SNF admissions. Disagreement between the discharge summary and the patient care referral form accounted for 62.0% (n = 307) of all medication discrepancies. Cardiovascular agents, opioid analgesics, neuropsychiatric agents, hypoglycemics, antibiotics, and anticoagulants accounted for over 50% of all discrepant medications.Medication discrepancies occurred in almost three out of four SNF admissions and accounted for one in five medications prescribed on admission. The discharge summary and the patient care referral forms from the discharging institution are often in disagreement. Our study findings underscore the importance of current efforts to improve the quality of inter-institutional communication.
| S-EPMC2669872 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundCandida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant yeast that contaminates healthcare environments causing healthcare-associated outbreaks. The mechanisms facilitating contamination are not established.MethodsC. auris was quantified in residents' bilateral axillary/inguinal composite skin swabs and environmental samples during a point-prevalence survey at a ventilator-capable skilled-nursing facility (vSNF A) with documented high colonization prevalence. Environmental samples were collected from all doorknobs, windowsills and handrails of each bed in 12 rooms. C. auris concentrations were measured using culture and C. auris-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) The relationship between C. auris concentrations in residents' swabs and associated environmental samples were evaluated using Kendall's tau-b (τ b) correlation coefficient.ResultsC. auris was detected in 70/100 tested environmental samples and 31/57 tested resident skin swabs. The mean C. auris concentration in skin swabs was 1.22 × 105 cells/mL by culture and 1.08 × 106 cells/mL by qPCR. C. auris was detected on all handrails of beds occupied by colonized residents, as well as 10/24 doorknobs and 9/12 windowsills. A positive correlation was identified between the concentrations of C. auris in skin swabs and associated handrail samples based on culture (τ b = 0.54, P = .0004) and qPCR (τ b = 0.66, P = 3.83e-6). Two uncolonized residents resided in beds contaminated with C. auris.ConclusionsColonized residents can have high C. auris burdens on their skin, which was positively related with contamination of their surrounding healthcare environment. These findings underscore the importance of hand hygiene, transmission-based precautions, and particularly environmental disinfection in preventing spread in healthcare facilities.
| S-EPMC8492228 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6181260 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Inability to obtain sufficient gains in function during a skilled nursing facility (SNF) stay impacts patients' functional trajectories and susceptibility to adverse events. The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of functional change in patients temporarily residing in an SNF following hospitalization. METHODS:One hundred forty patients admitted to a single SNF from the hospital who had both evaluation and discharge measures of physical function documented were included. Data from the Minimum Data Set 3.0 and electronic medical record were extracted to record clinical and demographic characteristics. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) was administered by rehabilitation therapists at evaluation and discharge. The SPPB consists of balance tests, gait speed, and a timed 5-time sit-to-stand test. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) Screening Tool for Depression was the only significant predictor of change in gait speed over an SNF stay. Eighty-seven percent of patients achieved a clinically meaningful change in the SPPB of 1 point or greater from evaluation to discharge, with 78% demonstrating a clinically meaningful change of 0.1 m/s or greater on gait speed. However, 69% of patients demonstrated SPPB scores of 6 points or less and 57% ambulated less than 0.65 m/s at the time of discharge from the SNF, which indicates severe disability. CONCLUSIONS:Poor physical function following an SNF stay places older adult at significant risk for adverse events including rehospitalization, future disability, and institutionalization. Understanding the predictors of functional change from evaluation to discharge may direct efforts toward developing innovative and effective interventions to improve function trajectories for older adults following an acute hospitalization.
| S-EPMC5740023 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThere is a need to adopt evidence-based approaches to discharge planning in the skilled nursing facility (SNF) short stay population.PurposeThis article describes implementation of the Reengineered Discharge (RED) process in SNFs and makes recommendations for its future implementation.MethodsThe methods included a pre- and postanalysis of an 18-month RED implementation with a contemporaneous comparison of 4 Midwestern SNFs randomly assigned to 2 different RED implementation strategies. The Standard facilities received less implementation than Enhanced facilities.ResultsStandard SNFs made more improvements and were more satisfied with the improved process than Enhanced SNFs. Field notes revealed that corporate willingness to make process changes impacted the Standard group's capacity for change; both groups were heavily influenced by external forces, and turnover was an impediment to RED implementation.ConclusionThis research revealed that discharge processes are similar across settings and that evidence-based programs such as RED can be adapted to the SNF setting.
| S-EPMC7008493 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of states' Medicaid bed-hold policies on the 30-day rehospitalization of Medicare postacute skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents.Data sourcesMinimum data set assessments were merged with Medicare claims and eligibility files for all first-time SNF admissions (N = 3,322,088) over the period 2000 through 2005; states' Medicaid bed-hold policies were obtained via survey.Study designRegression specification incorporating facility fixed effects to examine changes in Medicaid bed-hold policies on the likelihood of a 30-day SNF rehospitalization.Principal findingsUsing a continuous measure of bed-hold generosity, state Medicaid bed-hold was positively related to Medicare SNF rehospitalization. Specifically, the introduction of a bed-hold policy with average generosity increases Medicare rehospitalizations by 1.8 percent, representing roughly 12,000 SNF rehospitalizations at a cost to Medicare of approximately U.S.$100 million over our study period.ConclusionsAlthough facilities do not receive a Medicaid bed-hold payment for Medicare SNF stays, we found that the adoption of more generous policies led to greater SNF rehospitalizations. This type of spillover is largely ignored in current discussions of Medicare payment reforms such as bundled payment. Neither Medicare nor Medicaid has an incentive to internalize the risks and benefits of its actions as they affect the other.
| S-EPMC3029851 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo describe the frequency and timing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody detection in a convenience sample of skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents with and without confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.DesignRetrospective analysis of SNF electronic health records.SettingQualitative SARS-CoV-2 antibody test results were available from 81 SNFs in 16 states.ParticipantsSix hundred and sixty nine SNF residents who underwent both polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antibody testing for SARS-CoV-2.MeasurementsPresence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies following the first positive PCR test for confirmed cases, or first PCR test for non-cases.ResultsAmong 397 residents with PCR-confirmed infection, antibodies were detected in 4 of 7 (57.1%) tested within 7-14 days of their first positive PCR test; in 44 of 47 (93.6%) tested within 15-30 days; in 182 of 219 (83.1%) tested within 31-60 days; and in 110 of 124 (88.7%) tested after 60 days. Among 272 PCR negative residents, antibodies were detected in 2 of 9 (22.2%) tested within 7-14 days of their first PCR test; in 41 of 81 (50.6%) tested within 15-30 days; in 65 of 148 (43.9%) tested within 31-60 days; and in 9 of 34 (26.5%) tested after 60 days. No significant differences in baseline resident characteristics or symptoms were observed between those with versus without antibodies.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that vulnerable older adults can mount an antibody response to SARS-CoV-2, and that antibodies are most likely to be detected within 15-30 days of diagnosis. That antibodies were detected in a large proportion of residents with no confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection highlights the complexity of identifying who is infected in real time. Frequent surveillance and diagnostic testing based on low thresholds of clinical suspicion for symptoms and/or exposure will remain critical to inform strategies designed to mitigate outbreaks in SNFs while community SARS-CoV-2 prevalence remains high.
| S-EPMC8013911 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVE:To identify the challenges that reductions in length of stay (LOS) pose for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and their postacute care (PAC) patients. DATA SOURCES/SETTING:Seventy interviews with staff in 25 SNFs in eight U.S. cities, LOS data for patients in those SNFs. STUDY DESIGN:Data were qualitatively analyzed, and key themes were identified. Interview data from SNFs with and without reductions in median risk-adjusted LOS were compared and contrasted. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS:We conducted 70 semistructured interviews. LOS data were derived from minimum dataset (MDS) admission records available for all patients in all U.S. SNFs from 2012 to 2014. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:Challenges reported regardless of reductions in LOS included frequent and more complicated re-authorization processes, patients becoming responsible for costs, and discharging patients whom staff felt were unsafe at home. Challenges related to reduced LOS included SNFs being pressured to discharge patients within certain time limits. Some SNFs reported instituting programs and processes for following up with patients after discharge. These programs helped alleviate concerns about patients, but they resulted in nonreimbursable costs for facilities. CONCLUSIONS:The push for shorter LOS has resulted in unexpected challenges and costs for SNFs and possible unintended consequences for PAC patients.
| S-EPMC6232452 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceThe new Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing program (SNF VBP) seeks to improve patient outcomes by awarding financial incentives or penalties based on 30-day hospital readmission rates. Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) can avoid a penalty through low baseline readmission rates or improvement over time.ObjectiveTo assess the baseline performance and improvement over time of SNFs in the SNF VBP program.Design, setting, and participantsThis cross-sectional study examined readmission rates, financial penalties and incentives, and facility and patient characteristics associated with these outcomes at 14 959 US SNFs that received Medicare payments between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019.Main outcomes and measuresOutcomes were readmission rates and financial penalties by facility. The SNFs were classified as improvers in the analysis if they had better improvement scores than baseline scores under the program and achievers if they had higher baseline scores than improvement scores.ResultsOf 14 959 SNFs studied, 1849 (12.3%) were assigned their improvement score as their performance score in the first year of the program. Of these, 1167 (63.1%) received a financial penalty, whereas 374 (20.2%) received a bonus. Only 52 facilities that performed poorly at baseline (0.3% of all SNFs and 0.7% of below-median performers) were able to improve enough to avoid a financial penalty, despite large improvements in readmission rates. Improver SNFs treated larger racial minority populations (mean [SD], 74.57% [23.42%] White in the improver group vs 79.15% [22.18%] in the achiever group) and were located in counties with larger minority populations (mean [SD], 15.48% [14.05%] Black in the improver group vs 11.57% [12.72%] Black in the achiever group). The most important predictors of improvement were related to SNF finances, such as operating margin (mean [SD], -0.74 [13.87]) and occupancy rates (mean [SD], 79.93 [14.81]).Conclusions and relevanceThis cross-sectional study suggests that the SNF VBP program did not offer a viable path for nearly all low-performing SNFs to avoid financial penalties through improved readmission rates.
| S-EPMC8886527 | biostudies-literature