Dataset Information

Peak left atrial strain as a single measure for the non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures.

ABSTRACT: Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures is performed using a multi-parametric algorithm. Left atrial (LA) strain was recently found to accurately classify the degree of diastolic dysfunction. We hypothesized that LA strain could be used as a stand-alone marker and sought to identify and test a cutoff, which would accurately detect elevated LV pressures. We studied 76 patients with a spectrum of LV function who underwent same-day echocardiogram and invasive left-heart catheterization. Speckle tracking was used to measure peak LA strain. The protocol involved a retrospective derivation group (N?=?26) and an independent prospective validation cohort (N?=?50) to derive and then test a peak LA strain cutoff which would identify pre-A-wave LV diastolic pressure?>?15 mmHg. The guidelines-based assessment of filling pressures and peak LA strain were compared side-by-side against invasive hemodynamic data. In the derivation cohort, receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed area under curve of 0.76 and a peak LA strain cutoff?

SUBMITTER: Singh A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6353699 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Peak left atrial strain as a single measure for the non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures.

Singh Amita A Medvedofsky Diego D Mediratta Anuj A Balaney Bhavna B Kruse Eric E Ciszek Boguslawa B Shah Atman P AP Blair John E JE Maffessanti Francesco F Addetia Karima K Mor-Avi Victor V Lang Roberto M RM

The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 20180730 1

Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular (LV) filling pressures is performed using a multi-parametric algorithm. Left atrial (LA) strain was recently found to accurately classify the degree of diastolic dysfunction. We hypothesized that LA strain could be used as a stand-alone marker and sought to identify and test a cutoff, which would accurately detect elevated LV pressures. We studied 76 patients with a spectrum of LV function who underwent same-day echocardiogram and invasive left-he ...[more]

PMID: 30062535

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The 2016 guidelines for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction diagnosis has been simplified from previous versions; however, multiparametric diagnosis approach still exists indeterminate left ventricular diastolic dysfunction category. Left atrial (LA) strain was recently found useful to predict elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressures noninvasively. This study aimed to (1) analyze the diagnostic value of LA strain for noninvasive assessment of LV filling pressures in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) with preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF), using invasive hemodynamic assessment as the gold standard, and (2) explore whether LA strain combined with conventional diastolic parameters could detect elevated LV filling pressures alone. METHODS:Sixty-four patients with stable CAD having LVEF >?50% and 30 healthy controls were enrolled. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography was used to measure LA strain during the reservoir (LASr), conduit, and contraction phases. LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), as a surrogate for LV filling pressures, was invasively obtained by left heart catheterization. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio to predict LV filling pressures. Pearson's correlation was used to analyze associations between echocardiographic parameters and LVEDP. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was calculated to determine the capability of the echocardiographic parameters to detect elevated LVEDP. Inter-technique agreement was analyzed by contingency tables and tested by kappa statistics. RESULTS:LASr and the ratio of early-diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E) to tissue Doppler early-diastolic septal mitral annular velocity (E/E'septal) significantly predicted elevated LV filling pressures. LASr was combined with E/E'septal to generate a novel parameter (LASr/E/E'septal). LASr/E/E'septal had the best predictive ability of elevated LV filling pressures. LVEDP was negatively correlated with LASr and LASr/E/E'septal but positively correlated with E/E'septal. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of LASr/E/E'septal was higher than that of LASr alone (0.83 vs. 0.75), better than all conventional LV diastolic parameters. Inter-technique agreement analysis showed that LASr/E/E'septal had good agreement with the invasive LVEDP measurement, better than the 2016 guideline (kappa?=?0.63 vs. 0.25). CONCLUSIONS:LASr provided additive diagnostic value for the noninvasive assessment of LV filling pressures. LASr/E/E'septal had the potential to be a better single noninvasive index to predict elevated LV filling pressures in patients with stable CAD and preserved LVEF.

Project description:BackgroundDiastolic dysfunction is associated with morbidity and mortality in multiple pediatric disease processes. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides a non-invasive method of studying left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction through the assessment of LV filling curves and left atrial (LA) volume and function. However, there are no normative data for LV filling curves and the standard method is time-intensive. This study aims to compare an alternate, more rapid method of obtaining LV filling curves to standard methodology and report normative CMR diastolic function data for LV filling curves and LA volumes and function.MethodsNinety-six healthy pediatric subjects (14.3 ± 3.4 years) with normal CMR defined by normal biventricular size and systolic function without late gadolinium enhancement were included. LV filling curves were generated by removing basal slices without myocardium present throughout the cardiac cycle and apical slices with poor endocardial delineation (compressed method), then re-generated including every phase of myocardium from apex to base (standard method). Indices of diastolic function included peak filling rate and time to peak filling. Systolic metrics included peak ejection rate and time to peak ejection. Both peak ejection and peak filling rates were indexed to end-diastolic volume. LA maximum, minimum and pre-contraction volumes were calculated using a biplane method. Inter-and intra-observer variability were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the effects of body surface area (BSA), gender and age on metrics of diastolic function.ResultsBSA had the largest effect on LV filling curves. Normal LV filling data are reported for both compressed and standard methods. The time to perform the compressed method was significantly shorter than the standard method (median 6.1 min vs. 12.5 min, p < 0.001). Both methods had strong to moderate correlation for all metrics. Intra-observer reproducibility was moderate to high for all LV filling and LA metrics except for time to peak ejection and peak filling.ConclusionsWe report reference values for LV filling metrics and LA volumes. The compressed method is more rapid and produces similar results to standard methodology, which may facilitate the use of LV filling in clinical CMR reporting.

Dataset Information

Peak left atrial strain as a single measure for the non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures.

Publications

Peak left atrial strain as a single measure for the non-invasive assessment of left ventricular filling pressures.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets