Dataset Information

Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

ABSTRACT: Echocardiographic assessment of diastolic dysfunction depends on surrogate parameters. In recent years, guideline committees attempted to combine these parameters to diagnostic flowcharts allowing for correct classification of left ventricular filling pressures (LVFP). The value of these diagnostic tools is limited if the applied surrogate parameters are elevated due to other reasons as is the case with maximal tricuspid regurgitation velocity. We aimed to compare the accuracy of the 2009 and the 2016 guideline recommendations in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). We included 101 consecutive patients who underwent right heart catheterization and transthoracic echocardiography for suspicion of PH. For the final analysis, only patients with PH were considered. The 2009 and 2016 recommendations for the assessment of diastolic function by echocardiography were applied on each patient. A total of 63 PH patients were included in the final analysis, 43% had elevated LVFP. By using the 2009 recommendations, sensitivity for correct classification of diastolic dysfunction was 67%, specificity was 82%, area under the curve (AUC) was 0.74. By using the 2016 recommendations, sensitivity for correct classification of diastolic dysfunction was 84%, specificity was 80%, AUC was 0.82. In ROC comparison, the AUC for the 2016 recommendations with 0.82 was significantly better compared to the AUC of 0.74 for the 2009 recommendations (p?=?0.04). Our study demonstrates that the 2016 recommendations for echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function are superior to the 2009 recommendations in estimating left ventricular filling pressures in patients with PH.

SUBMITTER: Ran H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6486531 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Ran Hong H Schneider Matthias M Pistritto Anna Maria AM Gerges Christian C Heidari Houtan H Binder Thomas T Lang Irene I Goliasch Georg G

The international journal of cardiovascular imaging 20190121 5

Echocardiographic assessment of diastolic dysfunction depends on surrogate parameters. In recent years, guideline committees attempted to combine these parameters to diagnostic flowcharts allowing for correct classification of left ventricular filling pressures (LVFP). The value of these diagnostic tools is limited if the applied surrogate parameters are elevated due to other reasons as is the case with maximal tricuspid regurgitation velocity. We aimed to compare the accuracy of the 2009 and th ...[more]

PMID: 30666551

Similar Datasets

Project description:Evaluation of left ventricular filling pressure plays an important role in the clinical management of pulmonary hypertension. However, the accuracy of echocardiographic parameters for the determination of left ventricular filling pressure in the presence of pulmonary vascular lesions has not been fully addressed. We retrospectively investigated 124 patients with pulmonary hypertension due to pulmonary vascular lesions (noncardiac pulmonary hypertension group) and 113 patients with ischemic heart disease (control group) who underwent right heart catheterization and echocardiography. The noncardiac pulmonary hypertension group was subdivided into less-advanced and advanced groups according to median pulmonary vascular resistance. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure was determined as left ventricular filling pressure. As echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular filling pressure, the ratio of early- (E) to late-diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E/A), ratio of E to early-diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e'), and left atrial volume index were measured. In the less-advanced noncardiac pulmonary hypertension and control groups, positive correlations were observed between pulmonary artery wedge pressure and late-diastolic transmitral flow velocity (R = 0.41, P = 0.002 and R = 0.71, P < 0.001, respectively) and left atrial volume index (R = 0.53, P < 0.001 and R = 0.41, P < 0.001), whereas in the advanced noncardiac pulmonary hypertension group, pulmonary artery wedge pressure was only correlated with left atrial volume index (R = 0.27, P = 0.032). In the controls, only pulmonary artery wedge pressure determined E (β = 0.48, P < 0.001), whereas both pulmonary artery wedge pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were independent determinants of E (β = 0.29, P < 0.001 and β = -0.28, P = 0.001, respectively) in the noncardiac pulmonary hypertension group. In conclusion, in the presence of advanced pulmonary vascular lesions, conventional echocardiographic parameters may not accurately reflect left ventricular filling pressure. Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance would lower the E, even when pulmonary artery wedge pressure is elevated, resulting in blunting of echocardiographic parameters for the detection of elevated left ventricular filling pressure.

Dataset Information

Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Publications

Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular filling pressures in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets