Cancer Care Collaborative Approach to Optimize Clinical Care.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Bidassie B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6375583 | biostudies-literature | 2017 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Cancer Care Collaborative Approach to Optimize Clinical Care.
Bidassie Balmatee B Hoffman-Hōgg Lori L Eapen Shaiju S Aggarwal Anita A Park Yeun-Hee Anna YA Keller Alison A Kelley Michael J MJ
Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS 20170501 Suppl 3
A collaboration between clinicians and industrial engineers resulted in significant improvements in cancer screening, the development of toolkits, and more efficient care for hepatocellular carcinoma and breast, colorectal, lung, head and neck, and prostate cancers. ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:The foundation for integrating mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics into systems medicine is to develop standardized start-to-finish and fit-for-purpose workflows for clinical specimens. An essential step in this pursuit is to highlight common ground in a diverse landscape of different sample preparation techniques and LC-MS setups with the aim to explore differences and potential confounding factors as well as to identify areas for improvement with a direct practical benefit. With the aim to benchmark and improve current best practices among the proteomics MS laboratories of the CLINSPECT-M consortium we performed two consecutive round robin studies with full freedom to operate in terms of sample preparation and MS measurements. The six participating study partners were provided with two clinically relevant sample matrices: plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In the first round each laboratory applied their current best practice protocol for the respective matrix, covering laboratory-specific sample proteolysis, liquid chromatography, and MS measurement procedure. All resulting MS files were analyzed centrally by a standardized pipeline. Based on the achieved results and following a fully transparent exchange of all lab-specific protocols within the consortium, each laboratory could improve their methods before measuring the same samples in a second acquisition round. The results of both measurement time points are compared with respect to identifications (IDs), data completeness, retention time and quantitative precision as well as inter-laboratory reproducibility. For instance, the number of identified protein groups was increased on average by 14% for CSF and 5% for plasma from first to second measurement round across participants resulting in a median overlap number of 579 protein groups for CSF and 246 IDs for plasma across setups. The individual performances of participating study centers and the inter-laboratory reproducibility were improved in the second measurement, emphasizing the effect and importance of expert-driven exchange of best practices. In total, the study not only clearly demonstrates the beneficial effect of sharing knowledge and expertise for direct practical improvements but also highlights tendencies such as common limits of detection or preferable preparation strategies.
2024-01-02 | PXD044053 | Pride
Project description:The foundation for integrating mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics into systems medicine is the development of standardized start-to-finish and fit-for-purpose workflows for clinical specimens. An essential step in this pursuit is to highlight the common ground in a diverse landscape of different sample preparation techniques and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) setups. With the aim to benchmark and improve the current best practices among the proteomics MS laboratories of the CLINSPECT-M consortium, we performed two consecutive round-robin studies with full freedom to operate in terms of sample preparation and MS measurements. The six study partners were provided with two clinically relevant sample matrices: plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In the first round, each laboratory applied their current best practice protocol for the respective matrix. Based on the achieved results and following a transparent exchange of all lab-specific protocols within the consortium, each laboratory could advance their methods before measuring the same samples in the second acquisition round. Both time points are compared with respect to identifications (IDs), data completeness, and precision, as well as reproducibility. As a result, the individual performances of participating study centers were improved in the second measurement, emphasizing the effect and importance of the expert-driven exchange of best practices for direct practical improvements.
| S-EPMC10775142 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionMultidisciplinary coordinated care has been associated with improvement of diabetes care.Aim and methodsThis is a retrospective cohort analysis aimed to assess the effect of application of the five-structured visits Multi-disciplinary Clinical Care Approach (FMCA) on each of T2DM control, complications and comorbidities. The patients' records were assessed for one year of regular diabetes care followed with a year after implementation of FMCA for patients attending the diabetes clinic at Zulekha hospital. The patients were divided according to HbA1c (cutoff 7%) at the end of the FMCA year of follow-up into a group of controlled and another group of uncontrolled diabetes designated CDM and UCDM, respectively.Results49% of patients were males and the mean age was 44.22 years. HbA1c levels, LDL and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) showed a marked decrease among the patients after implementation of FMCA (P = 0.02, P = 0.04, P = 0.003, respectively). Compared with an increase in the atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk score (ASCVD) during the regular period, exposure to FMCA significantly decreased the cardiovascular risk score (0.17%, 11.41%, P = 0.001, P = 0.001, respectively). A self-management score was significantly higher in CDM patients. After a multivariate regression analysis of factors affecting DM control, we detected that baseline HbA1c, UACR, self-management score and hospital admission rate were the most important factors to predict diabetes control.ConclusionThe implementation of FMCA has shown a significant improvement in clinical and humanistic aspects of individuals with T2DM with a better outcome, more control and less complications.
| S-EPMC10584289 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Inpatient portals are an emerging technology that can facilitate collaborative interactions between patients and care teams, but little is known about how organizations attempt to implement and facilitate inpatient portal use for their providers. METHODS:We held in-person, semistructured interviews with care team members and information technology (IT) staff and conducted rigorous thematic analysis of transcripts. RESULTS:Interviews with 220 care team members and 4 IT staff identified 3 new areas of training needed to optimize inpatient portal implementation and use that extend beyond training to use other technologies: (1) teaching staff to train patients about tool use; (2) training about how to promote tool use to patients; and (3) training about optimal use of secure messaging. DISCUSSION:Our findings show that inpatient portals are implemented within a collaborative multistakeholder context. Training efforts must consider the importance of this collaborative context to help providers learn to both incorporate the technology into their workflow and assist patients with portal use.
| S-EPMC6059853 | biostudies-other
Project description:AimOur objective was to integrate lessons learned from perinatal collaborative care programs across the United States, recognizing the diversity of practice settings and patient populations, to provide guidance on successful implementation.BackgroundCollaborative care is a health services delivery system that integrates behavioral health care into primary care. While efficacious, effectiveness requires rigorous attention to implementation to ensure adherence to the core evidence base.MethodsImplementation strategies are divided into three pragmatic stages: preparation, program launch, and program growth and sustainment; however, these steps are non-linear and dynamic.FindingsThe discussion that follows is not meant to be prescriptive; rather, all implementation tasks should be thoughtfully tailored to the unique needs and setting of the obstetric community and patient population. In particular, we are aware that implementation on the level described here assumes commitment of both effort and money on the part of clinicians, administrators, and the health system, and that such financial resources are not always available. We conclude with synthesis of a survey of existing collaborative care programs to identify implementation practices of existing programs.
| S-EPMC7503171 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceUp to 20% of adolescents experience an episode of major depression by age 18 years yet few receive evidence-based treatments for their depression.ObjectiveTo determine whether a collaborative care intervention for adolescents with depression improves depressive outcomes compared with usual care.DesignRandomized trial with blinded outcome assessment conducted between April 2010 and April 2013.SettingNine primary care clinics in the Group Health system in Washington State.ParticipantsAdolescents (aged 13-17 years) who screened positive for depression (Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item [PHQ-9] score ≥10) on 2 occasions or who screened positive and met criteria for major depression, spoke English, and had telephone access were recruited. Exclusions included alcohol/drug misuse, suicidal plan or recent attempt, bipolar disorder, developmental delay, and seeing a psychiatrist.InterventionsTwelve-month collaborative care intervention including an initial in-person engagement session and regular follow-up by master's-level clinicians. Usual care control youth received depression screening results and could access mental health services through Group Health.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was change in depressive symptoms on a modified version of the Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R; score range, 14-94) from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes included change in Columbia Impairment Scale score (CIS), depression response (≥50% decrease on the CDRS-R), and remission (PHQ-9 score <5).ResultsIntervention youth (n = 50), compared with those randomized to receive usual care (n = 51), had greater decreases in CDRS-R scores such that by 12 months intervention youth had a mean score of 27.5 (95% CI, 23.8-31.1) compared with 34.6 (95% CI, 30.6-38.6) in control youth (overall intervention effect: F2,747.3 = 7.24, P < .001). Both intervention and control youth experienced improvement on the CIS with no significant differences between groups. At 12 months, intervention youth were more likely than control youth to achieve depression response (67.6% vs 38.6%, OR = 3.3, 95% CI, 1.4-8.2; P = .009) and remission (50.4% vs 20.7%, OR = 3.9, 95% CI, 1.5-10.6; P = .007).Conclusions and relevanceAmong adolescents with depression seen in primary care, a collaborative care intervention resulted in greater improvement in depressive symptoms at 12 months than usual care. These findings suggest that mental health services for adolescents with depression can be integrated into primary care.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01140464.
| S-EPMC4492537 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundHypertension (HTN) is highly prevalent among people with HIV (PWH) in Namibia, but screening and treatment for HTN are not routinely offered as part of HIV care delivery. We report the implementation of a quality improvement collaborative (QIC) to accelerate integration of HTN and HIV care within public-sector health facilities in Namibia.MethodsTwenty-four facilities participated in the QIC with the aim of increasing HTN screening and treatment among adult PWH (>15 years). HTN was defined according to national treatment guidelines (i.e., systolic blood pressure >140 and/or diastolic blood pressure >90 across three measurements and at least two occasions), and decisions regarding initiation of treatment were made by physicians only. Teams from participating hospitals used quality improvement methods, monthly measurement of performance indicators, and small-scale tests of change to implement contextually tailored interventions. Coaching of sites was performed on a monthly basis by clinical officers with expertise in QI and HIV, and sites were convened as part of learning sessions to facilitate diffusion of effective interventions.ResultsBetween March 2017 and March 2018, hypertension screening occurred as part of 183,043 (86%) clinical encounters at participating facilities. Among 1,759 PWH newly diagnosed with HTN, 992 (56%) were initiated on first-line treatment. Rates of treatment initiation were higher in facilities with an on-site physician (61%) compared to those without one (51%). During the QIC, facility teams identified fourteen interventions to improve HTN screening and treatment. Among barriers to implementation, teams pointed to malfunctions of blood pressure machines and stock outs of antihypertensive medications as common challenges.ConclusionsImplementation of a QIC provided a structured approach for integrating HTN and HIV services across 24 high-volume facilities in Namibia. As rates of HTN treatment remained low despite ongoing facility-level changes, policy-level interventions-such as task sharing and supply chain strengthening-should be pursued to further improve delivery of HTN care among PWH beyond initial screening.
| S-EPMC9371294 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe current model of clinical drug development in oncology displays major limitations due to a high attrition rate in patient enrollment in early phase trials and a high failure rate of drugs in phase III studies.ObjectiveIntegrating transcriptomics for selection of patients has the potential to achieve enhanced speed and efficacy of precision oncology trials for any targeted therapies or immunotherapies.MethodsRelative gene expression level in the metastasis and normal organ-matched tissues from the WINTHER database was used to estimate in silico the potential clinical benefit of specific treatments in a variety of metastatic solid tumors.ResultsAs example, high mRNA expression in tumor tissue compared to analogous normal tissue of c-MET and its ligand HGF correlated in silico with shorter overall survival (OS; p < 0.0001) and may constitute an independent prognostic marker for outcome of patients with metastatic solid tumors, suggesting a strategy to identify patients most likely to benefit from MET-targeted treatments. The prognostic value of gene expression of several immune therapy targets (PD-L1, CTLA4, TIM3, TIGIT, LAG3, TLR4) was investigated in non-small-cell lung cancers and colorectal cancers (CRCs) and may be useful to optimize the development of their inhibitors, and opening new avenues such as use of anti-TLR4 in treatment of patients with metastatic CRC.ConclusionThis in silico approach is expected to dramatically decrease the attrition of patient enrollment and to simultaneously increase the speed and detection of early signs of efficacy. The model may significantly contribute to lower toxicities. Altogether, our model aims to overcome the limits of current approaches.
| S-EPMC10071163 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundReports of inadequate cancer patient care have given rise to various interventions to support cancer care pathways which, overall, seem poorly studied. Case management (CM) is one method that may support a cost-effective, high-quality patient-centred treatment and care.The purpose of this article was to summarise intervention characteristics, outcomes of interest, results, and validity components of the published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining CM as a method for optimizing cancer care pathways.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched for RCTs published all years up to August 2008. Identified papers were included if they passed the following standards.Inclusion criteria1) The intervention should meet the criteria for CM which includes multidisciplinary collaboration, care co-ordination, and it should include in-person meetings between patient and the case manager aimed at supporting, informing and educating the patient. 2) The intervention should focus on cancer patient care. 3) The intervention should aim to improve subjective or objective quality outcomes, and effects should be reported in the paper.Exclusion criteriaStudies centred on cancer screening or palliative cancer care.Data extraction was conducted in order to obtain a descriptive overview of intervention characteristics, outcomes of interest and findings. Elements of CONSORT guidelines and checklists were used to assess aspects of study validity.ResultsThe searches identified 654 unique papers, of which 25 were retrieved for scrutiny. Seven papers were finally included. Intervention characteristics, outcomes studied, findings and methodological aspects were all very diverse.ConclusionDue to the scarcity of papers included (seven), significant heterogeneity in target group, intervention setting, outcomes measured and methodologies applied, no conclusions can be drawn about the effect of CM on cancer patient care.It is a major challenge that CM shrouds in a "black box", which means that it is difficult to determine which aspect(s) of interventions contribute to overall effects. More trials on rigorously developed CM interventions (opening up the "black box") are needed as is the re-testing of interventions and outcomes studied in various settings.
| S-EPMC2596122 | biostudies-literature
Project description:(1) Background: A pharmacist-led deprescribing service previously developed within the Consultation-Based Palliative Care Team (CB-PCT) was implemented for terminal cancer patients. (2) Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of the developed deprescribing service for terminal cancer patients in CB-PCT. (3) Methods: A retrospective analysis compared the active care (AC) group to the historical usual care (UC) group. The clinical outcomes included the deprescribing rate of preventive medications, the proportion of patients with one or more medication-related problems (MRPs) resolved upon discharge, and the clinical significance. The implementability of the service was also gauged by the acceptance rates of pharmacists' interventions. (4) Results: Preventive medications included lipid-lowering agents, gastroprotective agents, vitamins, antihypertensives, and antidiabetic agents. The AC group revealed a higher deprescribing rate (10.4% in the UC group vs. 29.6% in the AC group, p < 0.001). At discharge, more AC patients had one or more MRPs deprescribed (39.7% vs. 2.97% in UC, p < 0.001). The clinical significance consistently had a very significant rating (mean score of 2.96 out of 4). Acceptance rates were notably higher in the AC group (30.0% vs. 78.0%. p = 0.003). (5) Conclusions: The collaborative deprescribing service in CB-PCT effectively identified and deprescribed MRPs that are clinically significant and implementable in practice.
| S-EPMC10706958 | biostudies-literature