Dataset Information

Comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of cervical cancer staging.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE::To compare the performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) based on readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE) and single-shot EPI (SS-EPI) sequence in evaluating cervical cancer staging. METHODS::61 patients with cervical cancer underwent DWI based on SS-EPI and RESOLVE. Two blinded readers independently assessed two sets of DW images for distinction of anatomical structures, delineation of lesion, susceptibility artefact and overall image quality on a 4-point scale. Geometric distortion was evaluated by measuring lesion anteroposterior (AP) length and left-right (LR) width derived from T2W images and those obtained from the corresponding DW images. Staging of cervical cancer on SS-EPI and RESOLVE were compared with T2WI and gold-standard of pathological findings. RESULTS::RESOLVE was significantly superior to SS-EPI for all four criteria regarding qualitative comparisons (all p < 0.05). Regarding the geometric distortion, AP length on SS-EPI was significantly different from that of T2WI (p < 0.05), whereas there were no significant differences between RESOLVE and T2WI (both p > 0.05). The staging of SS-EPI was overestimated, while RESOLVE had a better consistency with pathological staging than SS-EPI in staging of cervical cancer. There was no significant difference in apparent diffusion coefficient value between SS-EPI and RESOLVE (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION::RESOLVE is superior to SS-EPI in the accuracy of cervical cancer staging because of the improvement in image quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE::RESOLVE has a more accurate value comparable to SS-EPI in cervical cancer staging, with the advantage of the improvement in image quality and reduced geometric distortion.

SUBMITTER: Qian W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6404812 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of cervical cancer staging.

Qian Weiliang W Chen Qian Q Zhang Zhongshuai Z Wang Hong H Zhang Jibin J Xu Jianming J

The British journal of radiology 20181101 1094

<h4>Objective:</h4>To compare the performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) based on readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (RESOLVE) and single-shot EPI (SS-EPI) sequence in evaluating cervical cancer staging.<h4>Methods:</h4>61 patients with cervical cancer underwent DWI based on SS-EPI and RESOLVE. Two blinded readers independently assessed two sets of DW images for distinction of anatomical structures, delineation of lesion, susceptibility artefact and overall image quality on a 4-point ...[more]

PMID: 30359094

Similar Datasets

Project description:We compared the clinical utility of single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) using different breathing schemes, readout-segmented EPI and zoomit EPI in the repeatability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, cortico-medullary contrast to noise ratio (c-mCNR) and image quality. In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, some common clinically applicable diffusion-weighted imaging (b = 50, 400, 800 s/mm2) of kidney on 3.0 T MRI were performed on 22 volunteers using SS-EPI with breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging (BH-DWI), free-breathing (FB-DWI), navigator-triggered (NT-DWI) and respiratory-triggered (RT-DWI), readout-segmented DWI (RS-DWI), and Zoomit DWI (Z-DWI). ADC and c-mCNR were measured in 12 anatomic locations (the upper, middle, and lower pole of the renal cortex and medulla), and image quality was assessed on these DWI sequences. A DWI with the optimal clinical utility was decided by systematically assessing the ADC repeatability, c-mCNR and image quality among the DWIs. For ADC measurements, Z-DWI had an excellent intra-observer agreement (intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs): 0.876-0.944) and good inter-observer agreement (inter-class ICCs: 0.798-0.856) in six DWI sequences. Z-DWI had the highest ADC repeatability in most of the 12 anatomic locations of the kidneys (mean ADC absolute difference: 0.070-0.111 × 10-3 mm2/s, limit of agreement: 0.031-0.056 × 10-3 mm2/s). In all DWIs, Z-DWI yielded a slightly higher c-mCNR than other DWIs in most representative locations (P > 0.05), which was significantly higher than BH-DWI and FB-DWI in the middle pole of both kidneys and the upper pole of the left kidney (P < 0.05). In addition, Z-DWI yielded image quality that was similar to RT-DWI and NT-DWI (P > 0.05) and superior to BH-DWI, FB-DWI and RS-DWI (P < 0.05). Our results suggest that Z-DWI provides the highest ADC reproducibility, better c-mCNR and good image quality on 3.0 T MRI, making it the recommended sequence for clinical DWI of the kidney.

Project description:BackgroundDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) image quality will affect how well radiologists detect lesions and judge muscular invasion. This study qualitatively and quantitatively compared the image quality of DWI with integrated slice-specific dynamic shimming (iShim) and single-shot echo-planar imaging (SS-EPI) in the diagnosis of bladder cancer (BC) using 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also investigated the application value of iShim DWI in BC.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 97 patients with BC who underwent a preoperative MRI examination, including iShim and SS-EPI DWI. Two radiologists, blinded to the type of DWI, independently rated DWIs on a 5-point Likert scale regarding image quality features (anatomical details, distortion, lesion conspicuity, artifacts, and overall image quality) and evaluated tumor muscular invasion. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and tumor numbers were manually recorded by another 2 radiologists. Pathologists recorded tumor numbers and sizes in a standard manner.ResultsThe inter- and intraobserver consistency of image quality features scoring was good to excellent (κ >0.75; P<0.001). The scores of iShim DWI were higher than those of SS-EPI DWI in terms of distortion, artifacts, and overall image quality (P<0.001). The SNR and CNR of iShim DWI were higher than those of SS-EPI DWI (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in ADC values between the 2 sequences (P>0.05). Based on pathological findings, the sensitivity of iShim and SS-EPI DWI in diagnosing tumor that diameter less than 1 cm was 100% (79/79) and 93.7% (74/79), respectively. The specificity and accuracy (95.2% and 90.2%, respectively) of iShim DWI in diagnosing tumor muscular invasion were significantly higher than those of SS-EPI DWI (76.2% and 80.4%, respectively). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of iShim DWI was significantly higher than that of SS-EPI DWI in diagnosing tumor muscular invasion (P=0.017).ConclusionsCompared with SS-EPI DWI, iShim DWI provided higher image quality. iShim DWI effectively detected BC and better identified muscular invasion. This finding can guide the clinical selection of appropriate treatments for patients with BC.

Dataset Information

Comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of cervical cancer staging.

Publications

Comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of cervical cancer staging.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets