Dataset Information

Severity scoring of lung oedema on the chest radiograph is associated with clinical outcomes in ARDS.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:There is no accurate, non-invasive measurement to estimate the degree of pulmonary oedema in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We developed the Radiographic Assessment of Lung Oedema (RALE) score to evaluate the extent and density of alveolar opacities on chest radiographs. After first comparing the RALE score to gravimetric assessment of pulmonary oedema in organ donors, we then evaluated the RALE score in patients with ARDS for its relationship to oxygenation and clinical outcomes. METHODS:We compared radiographs with excised lung weights from 72 organ donors (derivation cohort) and radiographs with clinical data from 174 patients with ARDS in the ARDSNet Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (validation cohort). To calculate RALE, each radiographic quadrant was scored for extent of consolidation (0-4) and density of opacification (1-3). The product of the consolidation and density scores for each of the four quadrants was summed (maximum score=48). RESULTS:Agreement between two independent reviewers for RALE score was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.93, 95%?CI 0.91 to 0.95). In donors, pre-procurement RALE score correlated with height-adjusted total lung weight (?=0.59, p<0.001). In patients with ARDS, higher RALE scores were independently associated with lower PaO2/fractional inspired oxygen and worse survival. Conservative fluid management significantly decreased RALE score over 3 days compared with liberal fluid management. CONCLUSIONS:The RALE score can be used to assess both the extent of pulmonary oedema and the severity of ARDS, by utilising information that is already obtained routinely, safely and inexpensively in every patient with ARDS. This novel non-invasive measure should be useful for assessing ARDS severity and monitoring response to therapy.

SUBMITTER: Warren MA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6410734 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Severity scoring of lung oedema on the chest radiograph is associated with clinical outcomes in ARDS.

Warren Melissa A MA Zhao Zhiguou Z Koyama Tatsuki T Bastarache Julie A JA Shaver Ciara M CM Semler Matthew W MW Rice Todd W TW Matthay Michael A MA Calfee Carolyn S CS Ware Lorraine B LB

Thorax 20180614 9

<h4>Background</h4>There is no accurate, non-invasive measurement to estimate the degree of pulmonary oedema in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We developed the Radiographic Assessment of Lung Oedema (RALE) score to evaluate the extent and density of alveolar opacities on chest radiographs. After first comparing the RALE score to gravimetric assessment of pulmonary oedema in organ donors, we then evaluated the RALE score in patients with ARDS for its relationship to oxygenation and c ...[more]

PMID: 29903755

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo compare the diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement of five different CT chest severity scoring systems for COVID-19 to find the most precise one with the least interpretation time.Methods and materialsThis retrospective study included 85 patients (54 male and 31 female) with PCR-confirmed COVID-19. They underwent CT to assess the severity of pulmonary involvement. Three readers were asked to assess the pulmonary abnormalities and score the severity using five different systems, including chest CT severity score (CT-SS), chest CT score, total severity score (TSS), modified total severity score (m-TSS), and 3-level chest CT severity score. Time consumption on reporting of each system was calculated.ResultsTwo hundred fifty-five observations were reported for each system. There was a statistically significant inter-observer agreement in assessing qualitative lung involvement using the m-TSS and the other four quantitative systems. The ROC curves revealed excellent and very good diagnostic accuracy for all systems when cutoff values for detection severe cases were > 22, > 17, > 12, and > 26 for CT-SS, chest CT score, TSS, and 3-level CT severity score. The AUC was very good (0.86), excellent (0.90), very good (0.89), and very good (0.86), respectively. Chest CT score showed the highest specificity (95.2%) in discrimination of severe cases. Time consumption on reporting was significantly different (< 0.001): CT-SS > 3L-CT-SS > chest CT score > TSS.ConclusionAll chest CT severity scoring systems in this study demonstrated excellent inter-observer agreement and reasonable performance to assess COVID-19 in relation to the clinical severity. CT-SS and TSS had the highest specificity and least time for interpretation.Key points• All chest CT severity scoring systems discussed in this study revealed excellent inter-observer agreement and reasonable performance to assess COVID-19 in relation to the clinical severity. • Chest CT scoring system and TSS had the highest specificity. • Both TSS and m-TSS consumed the least time compared to the other three scoring systems.

Project description:BackgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common cause of respiratory failure in critically ill patients, and diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) is considered its histological hallmark. Sepsis is one of the most common aetiology of ARDS with the highest case-fatality rate. Identifying ARDS patients and differentiate them from other causes of acute respiratory failure remains a challenge. To address this, many studies have focused on identifying biomarkers that can help assess lung epithelial injury. However, there is scarce information available regarding the tissue expression of these markers. Evaluating the expression of elafin, RAGE, and SP-D in lung tissue offers a potential bridge between serological markers and the underlying histopathological changes. Therefore, we hypothesize that the expression of epithelial injury markers varies between sepsis and ARDS as well as according to its severity.MethodsWe compared the post-mortem lung tissue expression of the epithelial injury markers RAGE, SP-D, and elafin of patients that died of sepsis, ARDS, and controls that died from non-pulmonary causes. Lung tissue was collected during routine autopsy and protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. We also assessed the lung injury by a semi-quantitative analysis.ResultsWe observed that all features of DAD were milder in septic group compared to ARDS group. Elafin tissue expression was increased and SP-D was decreased in the sepsis and ARDS groups. Severe ARDS expressed higher levels of elafin and RAGE, and they were negatively correlated with PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and positively correlated with bronchopneumonia percentage and hyaline membrane score. RAGE tissue expression was negatively correlated with mechanical ventilation duration in both ARDS and septic groups. In septic patients, elafin was positively correlated with ICU admission length, SP-D was positively correlated with serum lactate and RAGE was correlated with C-reactive protein.ConclusionsLung tissue expression of elafin and RAGE, but not SP-D, is associated with ARDS severity, but does not discriminate sepsis patients from ARDS patients.

Dataset Information

Severity scoring of lung oedema on the chest radiograph is associated with clinical outcomes in ARDS.

Publications

Severity scoring of lung oedema on the chest radiograph is associated with clinical outcomes in ARDS.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets