Dataset Information

Isolation of B-cells using Miltenyi MACS bead isolation kits.

ABSTRACT: This article describes the procedures used to isolate pure B-cell populations from whole blood using various Miltenyi magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) bead Isolation kits. Such populations are vital for studies investigating the functional capacity of B-cells, as the presence of other cell types may have indirect effects on B-cell function through cell-cell interactions or by secretion of several soluble molecules. B-cells can be isolated by two main approaches: 1) Negative selection-in which B-cells remain "untouched" in their native state; this is advantageous as it is likely that B-cells remain functionally unaltered by this process. 2) Positive selection-in which B-cells are labelled and actively removed from the sample. We used three Negative B-cell isolation kits as well as the Positive B-cell isolation kit from Miltenyi and compared the purity of each of the resulting B-cells fractions. Contamination of isolated B-cell fractions with platelets was the conclusive finding for all of the isolation techniques tested. These results illustrate the inefficiency of current available MACS B-cell isolation kits to produce pure B-cell populations, from which concrete findings can be made. As such we suggest cell sorting as the preferred method for isolating pure B-cells to be used for downstream functional assays.

SUBMITTER: Moore DK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6426237 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Isolation of B-cells using Miltenyi MACS bead isolation kits.

Moore Dannielle K DK Motaung Bongani B du Plessis Nelita N Shabangu Ayanda N AN Loxton André G AG

PloS one 20190320 3

This article describes the procedures used to isolate pure B-cell populations from whole blood using various Miltenyi magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) bead Isolation kits. Such populations are vital for studies investigating the functional capacity of B-cells, as the presence of other cell types may have indirect effects on B-cell function through cell-cell interactions or by secretion of several soluble molecules. B-cells can be isolated by two main approaches: 1) Negative selection-in wh ...[more]

PMID: 30893384

Similar Datasets

Project description:Recently, gingival margin-derived stem/progenitor cells isolated via STRO-1/magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) showed remarkable periodontal regenerative potential in vivo. As a second-stage investigation, the present study's aim was to perform in vitro characterisation and comparison of the stem/progenitor cell characteristics of sorted STRO-1-positive (MACS?) and STRO-1-negative (MACS?) cell populations from the human free gingival margin. Cells were isolated from the free gingiva using a minimally invasive technique and were magnetically sorted using anti-STRO-1 antibodies. Subsequently, the MACS? and MACS? cell fractions were characterized by flow cytometry for expression of CD14, CD34, CD45, CD73, CD90, CD105, CD146/MUC18 and STRO-1. Colony-forming unit (CFU) and multilineage differentiation potential were assayed for both cell fractions. Mineralisation marker expression was examined using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). MACS? and MACS(-) cell fractions showed plastic adherence. MACS? cells, in contrast to MACS? cells, showed all of the predefined mesenchymal stem/progenitor cell characteristics and a significantly higher number of CFUs (P<0.01). More than 95% of MACS? cells expressed CD105, CD90 and CD73; lacked the haematopoietic markers CD45, CD34 and CD14, and expressed STRO-1 and CD146/MUC18. MACS? cells showed a different surface marker expression profile, with almost no expression of CD14 or STRO-1, and more than 95% of these cells expressed CD73, CD90 and CD146/MUC18, as well as the haematopoietic markers CD34 and CD45 and CD105. MACS? cells could be differentiated along osteoblastic, adipocytic and chondroblastic lineages. In contrast, MACS? cells demonstrated slight osteogenic potential. Unstimulated MACS? cells showed significantly higher expression of collagen I (P<0.05) and collagen III (P<0.01), whereas MACS? cells demonstrated higher expression of osteonectin (P<0.05; Mann-Whitney). The present study is the first to compare gingival MACS? and MACS? cell populations demonstrating that MACS? cells, in contrast to MACS? cells, harbour stem/progenitor cell characteristics. This study also validates the effectiveness of the STRO-1/MACS? technique for the isolation of gingival stem/progenitor cells. Human free gingival margin-derived STRO-1/MACS? cells are a unique renewable source of multipotent stem/progenitor cells.

Project description:Purpose: To investigate and characterize the putative Elizabethkingia anophelis contaminant isolated from throat and anal swab samples of patients from three fever epidemic clusters, which were not COVID-19 related, in Shenzhen, China, during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Bacteria were cultured from throat (n = 28) and anal (n = 3) swab samples from 28 fever adolescent patients. The isolated bacterial strains were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF/MS) and the VITEK2 automated identification system. Nucleic acids were extracted from the patient samples (n = 31), unopened virus collection kits from the same manufacturer as the patient samples (n = 35, blank samples) and from unopened throat swab collection kits of two other manufacturers (n = 22, control samples). Metagenomic sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) detection were performed. Blood serum collected from patients (n = 13) was assessed for the presence of antibodies to E. anophelis. The genomic characteristics, antibiotic susceptibility, and heat resistance of E. anophelis isolates (n = 31) were analyzed. Results: The isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF/MS and VITEK2 as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica. DNA sequence analysis confirmed isolates to be E. anophelis. The patients' samples and blank samples were positive for E. anophelis. Control samples were negative for E. anophelis. The sera from a sub-sample of 13 patients were antibody-negative for isolated E. anophelis. Most of the isolates were highly homologous and carried multiple β-lactamase genes (bla B, bla GOB, and bla CME). The isolates displayed resistance to nitrofurans, penicillins, and most β-lactam drugs. The bacteria survived heating at 56°C for 30 min. Conclusion: The unopened commercial virus collection kits from the same manufacturer as those used to swab patients were contaminated with E. anophelis. Patients were not infected with E. anophelis and the causative agent for the fevers remains unidentified. The relevant authorities were swiftly notified of this discovery and subsequent collection kits were not contaminated. DNA sequence-based techniques are the definitive method for Elizabethkingia species identification. The E. anophelis isolates were multidrug-resistant, with partial heat resistance, making them difficult to eradicate from contaminated surfaces. Such resistance indicates that more attention should be paid to disinfection protocols, especially in hospitals, to avoid outbreaks of E. anophelis infection.

Dataset Information

Isolation of B-cells using Miltenyi MACS bead isolation kits.

Publications

Isolation of B-cells using Miltenyi MACS bead isolation kits.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets