Dataset Information

Comparison of Local Control of Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Surgical Resection: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT: Importance:Brain metastases are a common source of morbidity for patients with cancer, and limited data exist to support the local therapeutic choice between surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Objective:To evaluate local control of brain metastases among patients treated with SRS vs surgical resection within the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22952-26001 phase 3 trial. Design, Setting, and Participants:This unplanned, exploratory analysis of the international, multi-institutional randomized clinical trial EORTC 22952-26001 (conducted from 1996-2007) was performed from February 9, 2017, through July 25, 2018. The EORTC 22952-26001 trial randomized patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases to whole-brain radiotherapy vs observation after complete surgical resection or before SRS. Patients in the present analysis were stratified but not randomized according to local modality (SRS or surgical resection) and treated per protocol with 1 to 2 brain metastases and tumors with a diameter of no greater than 4 cm. Interventions:Surgical resection or SRS. Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary end point was local recurrence of treated lesions. Cumulative incidence of local recurrence was calculated according to modality (surgical resection vs SRS) with competing risk regression to adjust for prognostic factors and competing risk of death. Results:A total of 268 patients were included in the analysis (66.4% men; median age, 60.7 years [range, 26.9-81.1 years]); 154 (57.5%) underwent SRS and 114 (42.5%) underwent surgical resection. Median follow-up time was 39.9 months (range, 26.0-1982.0 months). Compared with the SRS group, patients undergoing surgical resection had larger metastases (median 28 mm [range, 10-40 mm] vs 20 mm [range, 4-40 mm]; P?

SUBMITTER: Churilla TM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6439566 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of Local Control of Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Surgical Resection: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Churilla Thomas M TM Chowdhury Imran H IH Handorf Elizabeth E Collette Laurence L Collette Sandra S Dong Yanqun Y Alexander Brian M BM Kocher Martin M Soffietti Riccardo R Claus Elizabeth B EB Weiss Stephanie E SE

JAMA oncology 20190201 2

<h4>Importance</h4>Brain metastases are a common source of morbidity for patients with cancer, and limited data exist to support the local therapeutic choice between surgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate local control of brain metastases among patients treated with SRS vs surgical resection within the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22952-26001 phase 3 trial.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>This unplan ...[more]

PMID: 30419088

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeRecent randomized controlled trials evaluating stereotactic surgery (SRS) for resected brain metastases question the high rates of local control previously reported in retrospective studies. Tumor control probability (TCP) models were developed to quantify the relationship between radiation dose and local control after SRS for resected brain metastases.Methods and materialsPatients with resected brain metastases treated with SRS were evaluated retrospectively. Melanoma, sarcoma, and renal cell carcinoma were considered radio-resistant histologies. The planning target volume (PTV) was the region of enhancement on T1 post-gadolinium magnetic resonance imaging plus a 2-mm uniform margin. The primary outcome was local recurrence, defined as tumor progression within the resection cavity. Cox regression evaluated predictors of local recurrence. Dose-volume histograms for the PTV were obtained from treatment plans and converted to 3-fraction equivalent doses (α/β = 12 Gy). TCP models evaluated local control at 1-year follow-up as a logistic function of dose-volume histogram data.ResultsAmong 150 cavities, 41 (27.3%) were radio-resistant. The median PTV volume was 14.6 mL (range, 1.3-65.3). The median prescription was 21 Gy (range, 15-25) in 3 fractions (range, 1-5). Local control rates at 12 and 24 months were 86% and 82%. On Cox regression, larger cavities (PTV > 12 cm3) predicted increased risk of local recurrence (P = .03). TCP modeling demonstrated relationships between improved 1-year local control and higher radiation doses delivered to radio-resistant cavities. Maximum PTV doses of 30, 35, and 40 Gy predicted 78%, 89%, and 94% local control among all radio-resistant cavities, versus 69%, 79%, and 86% among larger radio-resistant cavities.ConclusionsAfter SRS for resected brain metastases, larger cavities are at greater risk of local recurrence. TCP models suggests that higher radiation doses may improve local control among cavities of radio-resistant histology. Given maximum tolerated doses established for single-fraction SRS, fractionated regimens may be required to optimize local control in large radio-resistant cavities.

Project description:BackgroundThe brain is a common site for cancer metastases. In case of large and/or symptomatic brain metastases, neurosurgical resection is performed. Adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard procedure to minimize the risk of local recurrence and is increasingly performed as local stereotactic radiotherapy to the resection cavity. Both hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) and single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can be applied in this case. Although adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy to the resection cavity is widely used in clinical routine and recommended in international guidelines, the optimal fractionation scheme still remains unclear. The SATURNUS trial prospectively compares adjuvant HFSRT with SRS and seeks to detect the superiority of HFSRT over SRS in terms of local tumor control.MethodsIn this single center two-armed randomized phase III trial, adjuvant radiotherapy to the resection cavity of brain metastases with HFSRT (6 - 7 × 5 Gy prescribed to the surrounding isodose) is compared to SRS (1 × 12-20 Gy prescribed to the surrounding isodose). Patients are randomized 1:1 into the two different treatment arms. The primary endpoint of the trial is local control at the resected site at 12 months. The trial is based on the hypothesis that HFSRT is superior to SRS in terms of local tumor control.DiscussionAlthough adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy after resection of brain metastases is considered standard of care treatment, there is a need for further prospective research to determine the optimal fractionation scheme. To the best of our knowledge, the SATURNUS study is the only randomized phase III study comparing different regimes of postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy to the resection cavity adequately powered to detect the superiority of HFSRT regarding local control.Trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05160818, on December 16, 2021. The trial registry record is available on https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05160818 . The presented protocol refers to version V1.3 from March 21, 2021.

Project description:OBJECTIVE An analysis of factors contributing to durable radiographic control of spinal metastases was undertaken, drawing from a large single-institution database in an attempt to elucidate indications and dose requirements for successful treatment. METHODS All patients treated at a single institution with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of the spine as first-line therapy were assessed for local progression of the treated site, defined as radiographic enlargement of the treated tumor and/or biopsy-proven evidence of active tumor cells. All patients were followed with CT, PET, or MR imaging every 3-6 months until death. Treatment decisions were made by a multidisciplinary team of radiation oncologists, neurosurgeons, and neuroradiologists. Target volumes were defined according to the international consensus guidelines and were reviewed in a multidisciplinary conference. Image-guided techniques and intensity modulation were used for every case. The tumor's histological type, gross tumor volume (GTV), dose that covers 95% of the GTV (GTV D95), percentage of GTV covered by 95% of the prescribed dose (GTV V95), planning target volume (PTV), dose that covers 95% of the PTV (PTV D95), and percentage of PTV covered by 95% of the prescribed dose (PTV V95) were analyzed for significance in relation to local control, based on time to local progression. RESULTS A total of 811 lesions were treated in 657 patients between 2003 and 2015 at a single institution. The mean follow-up and overall survival for the entire cohort was 26.9 months (range 2-141 months). A total of 28 lesions progressed and the mean time to failure was 26 months (range 9.7-57 months). The median prescribed dose was 2400 cGy (range 1600-2600 cGy). Both GTV D95 and PTV D95 were highly significantly associated with local failure in univariate analysis, but GTV and PTV and histological type did not reach statistical significance. The median GTV D95 for the cohort equal to or above the GTV D95 1830 cGy cut point (high dose) was 2356 cGy, and it was 1709 cGy for the cohort of patients who received less than 1830 cGy (low dose). In terms of PTV D95, the median dose for those equal to or above the cut point of 1740 cGy (high dose) was 2233 cGy, versus 1644 cGy for those lesions below the PTV D95 cut point of 1740 cGy (low dose). CONCLUSIONS High-dose single-session SRS provides durable long-term control, regardless of the histological findings or tumor size. In this analysis, the only significant factors predictive of local control were related to the actual dose of radiation given. Although the target volumes were well treated with the intended dose, those lesions irradiated to higher doses (median GTV D95 2356 cGy, minimum 1830 cGy) had a significantly higher probability of durable local control than those treated with lower doses (median PTV D95 2232 cGy, minimum of 1740 cGy) (p < 0.001). Patients in the high-dose cohort had a 2% cumulative rate of local failure. Histological findings were not associated with local failure, suggesting that radioresistant histological types benefit in particular from radiosurgery. For patients with a favorable prognosis, a higher dose of SRS is important for long-term outcomes.

Project description:Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone after surgical resection is increasingly being used to provide excellent local control while avoiding the side effects of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). We report our ten year experience using this treatment scheme.To determine the rates and any correlates of local control, distant brain failure, and overall survival using SRS alone to the resection cavity.We performed a retrospective analysis of 509 patients with brain metastasis who underwent Gamma Knife SRS at our institution between 2003 and 2013. Of this group 85 patients were identified that had resection of the metastasis and subsequent SRS to the cavity. Mean dose to the resection cavity was 17.3 Gy (range 14-20) to an average volume of 12cc (range 0.3-83cc). Multiple patient, tumor, and treatment specific factors were collected for analysis (see Table 1). Vital statistics were provided by our institution's tumor registry. The primary endpoint of our analyses was recurrence free survival (RFS); defined as the duration in time between the date of SRS and any local or distant brain tumor recurrence.With a median follow up of 16.4 months, the overall local and distant brain failure at 12 months was 13% (95%CI 5%-21%) and 51% (95%CI 37%-64%) respectively. RPA was class 1 (5%), 2 (75%), and 3 (20%). The median overall survival (OS) was 20 months. The median RFS was 24 months with radiosensitive tumors: non small cell lung cancer (n=12), breast (n=16), gastrointestinal (n=7), small cell lung cancer (n=1), and other (n=9) compared to 5.6 months (p=0.006) in radioresistant tumors: melanoma (n=33), sarcoma (n=1), and renal cell carcinoma (n=6). Median OS for radioresistant and radiosensitive patients was 12 vs 25 months respectively (p=0.11). Additionally, there was a significant improved survival difference seen amongst those who had a gross total resection (GTR, n=46) compared to a sub total resection (n=39) with median OS of 27 vs 16 months (p=0.020) respectively. Radiographic changes suggestive of radiation necrosis were present in 6 patients, 2 of which were determined histiopathologicaly after surgical intervention. Due to the limited number of local recurrence events (n=10), there was insufficient power to analyze prognostic factors for local recurrence.Our results compare favorably with multiple other institution experiences showing excellent local control with SRS to the resection cavity following resection. Radioresistant histologies were associated with a worse RFS. Patients undergoing GTR had a significantly longer OS than those with STR. At our institution we continue to offer patients SRS to the resection cavity for those with good performance status and limited brain metastases.

Project description:IntroductionNeoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (NaSRS) of brain metastases has gained importance, but it is not routinely performed. While awaiting the results of prospective studies, we aimed to analyze the changes in the volume of brain metastases irradiated pre- and postoperatively and the resulting dosimetric effects on normal brain tissue (NBT).MethodsWe identified patients treated with SRS at our institution to compare hypothetical preoperative gross tumor and planning target volumes (pre-GTV and pre-PTV) with original postoperative resection cavity volumes (post-GTV and post-PTV) as well as with a standardized-hypothetical PTV with 2.0 mm margin. We used Pearson correlation to assess the association between the GTV and PTV changes with the pre-GTV. A multiple linear regression analysis was established to predict the GTV change. Hypothetical planning for the selected cases was created to assess the volume effect on the NBT exposure. We performed a literature review on NaSRS and searched for ongoing prospective trials.ResultsWe included 30 patients in the analysis. The pre-/post-GTV and pre-/post-PTV did not differ significantly. We observed a negative correlation between pre-GTV and GTV-change, which was also a predictor of volume change in the regression analysis, in terms of a larger volume change for a smaller pre-GTV. In total, 62.5% of cases with an enlargement greater than 5.0 cm3 were smaller tumors (pre-GTV < 15.0 cm3), whereas larger tumors greater than 25.0 cm3 showed only a decrease in post-GTV. Hypothetical planning for the selected cases to evaluate the volume effect resulted in a median NBT exposure of only 67.6% (range: 33.2-84.5%) relative to the dose received by the NBT in the postoperative SRS setting. Nine published studies and twenty ongoing studies are listed as an overview.ConclusionPatients with smaller brain metastases may have a higher risk of volume increase when irradiated postoperatively. Target volume delineation is of great importance because the PTV directly affects the exposure of NBT, but it is a challenge when contouring resection cavities. Further studies should identify patients at risk of relevant volume increase to be preferably treated with NaSRS in routine practice. Ongoing clinical trials will evaluate additional benefits of NaSRS.

Dataset Information

Comparison of Local Control of Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Surgical Resection: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Publications

Comparison of Local Control of Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Surgical Resection: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets