Project description:BackgroundWhile treatment options exist for solitary or disseminated Kaposi sarcoma (KS) disease, there are currently no standardized clinical treatment guidelines for cutaneous KS.ObjectiveThis systematic review seeks to identify safe and effective topical treatments for cutaneous KS lesions.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review using peer-reviewed articles from January 1970 to September 2021 published in the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases.ResultsFrom the initial search that yielded 590 studies, 34 met the inclusion criteria and were selected. Of the 34 studies, seven were clinical trials, 26 were case reports/series and one was a multicentre study. A total of 634 patients were included in our review. The three most common topical treatments used for cutaneous KS were imiquimod, alitretinoin and timolol. Topical alitretinoin was used in three case reports and three clinical trials. Topical imiquimod was used in eight case reports, one prospective phase II cohort study and one comparative single-blinded non-controlled clinical study. Topical timolol was used in nine case reports/series. Our review also identified reports of less widely used topical treatments for cutaneous KS. These include topical diphencyprone (DPCP), all-trans-retinoic-acid, rapamycin and bleomycin-dimethylsulfoxide (BLM-DMSO) which achieved variable response rates but have not been widely studied.ConclusionTopical alitretinoin, imiquimod and timolol demonstrated positive responses for cutaneous KS and the treatments were well tolerated. These three topical treatment modalities could be considered by clinicians when treating cutaneous KS.
Project description:In Part One of this two-part series, we discussed skin physiology and anatomy as well as generalities concerning topical analgesics. This modality of therapy has lesser side effects and drug-drug interactions, and patients tolerate this form of therapy better than many oral options. Unfortunately, this modality is not used as often as it could be in chronic pain states, such as that from neuropathic pain. Part Two discusses specific therapies, local anesthetics, and other drugs, as well as how a clinician might use specific aspects of a patient's neuropathic pain presentation to help guide them in the selection of a topical agent.
Project description:Onychomycosis is a challenging nail condition to treat. The gold standard treatment relies on long-term systemic therapy, which carries risks of potential side effects and drug interactions. Topical alternatives exist; however, treatment outcomes remain disappointing. In this article, we review newer topical formulations that are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, as well as other topical drugs that are still undergoing clinical trials. Lasers and energy-based devices have also been used for the treatment of onychomycosis; however, standardized parameters and clear treatment endpoints have yet to be specified. Currently, device-based therapies are considered as options for improving the cosmetic appearance of nails. The use of lasers to improve the penetration of topical antifungal treatments as possible combination treatments is also reviewed.
Project description:Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with periods of exacerbation and remissions. AD is characterized by intense, persistent pruritus and heterogeneity in clinical symptomatology and severity. Therapeutic goals include the amelioration of cutaneous eruptions, diminishing relapses and eventually the disease burden. To date, topical corticosteroids (TCS) and calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) have yet been deemed the mainstay of topical treatments in AD management. Nevertheless, despite their indisputable efficiency, TCS and TCI are not indicated for continuous long-term use given their safety profile. While research in AD has concentrated predominantly on systemic therapies, more than 30 novel topical compounds are under development. The existing data appear encouraging, with some regimens that are already FDA-approved (ruxolitinib was the most recent in September 2021) and several pharmaceutical pipeline products for mild-to-moderate AD that are in an advanced stage of development, such as tapinarof, difamilast and roflumilast. Larger, long-term studies are still required to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these novel compounds in the long run and weigh their advantages over present treatments. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the latest knowledge about AD topical treatments, echoing upcoming research trends.
Project description:BackgroundFollowing an epidemiological study carried out in 2006 showing a high prevalence of blinding trachoma in the Far North Region of Cameroon, a trachoma elimination programme using the SAFE strategy was initiated: three yearly trachoma mass treatments were to be performed.Methodology/principal findingsThe entire district population (120,000 persons) was treated with azithromycin 1.5% eye drops in February 2008 and January 2009. To assess the effect of treatment on the prevalence of active trachoma, three epidemiological studies were conducted on a representative sample of children aged between 1 and 10 years. The first study was performed just prior to the first treatment, the second just prior to the 2nd treatment and the third one, one year later. The prevalence of active forms of trachoma (TF + TI) dropped from 31.5% (95%CI 26.4-37.5) before treatment to 6.3% (95%CI 4.1-9.6) one year after first treatment; a reduction of nearly 80%. One year after the second treatment, the prevalence decreased to 3.1% (95%CI 2.0-4.9), a total reduction of 90%. Furthermore, there were no more TI cases (only TF). There was no report of serious or systemic side effects. Tolerance was excellent.Conclusions/significanceActive trachoma mass treatment with azithromycin 1.5% eye drops is feasible, well tolerated, and effective.
Project description:BackgroundAcne vulgaris is a common skin condition that may cause psychosocial distress. There is evidence that topical treatment combinations, chemical peels and photochemical therapy (combined blue/red light) are effective for mild-to-moderate acne, while topical treatment combinations, oral antibiotics combined with topical treatments, oral isotretinoin and photodynamic therapy are most effective for moderate-to-severe acne. Effective treatments have varying costs. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England considers cost-effectiveness when producing national clinical, public health and social care guidance.AimTo assess the cost-effectiveness of treatments for mild-to-moderate and moderate-to-severe acne to inform relevant NICE guidance.MethodsA decision-analytical model compared costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of effective topical pharmacological, oral pharmacological, physical and combined treatments for mild-to-moderate and moderate-to-severe acne, from the perspective of the National Health Service in England. Effectiveness data were derived from a network meta-analysis. Other model input parameters were based on published sources, supplemented by expert opinion.ResultsAll of the assessed treatments were more cost-effective than treatment with placebo (general practitioner visits without active treatment). For mild-to-moderate acne, topical treatment combinations and photochemical therapy (combined blue/red light) were most cost-effective. For moderate-to-severe acne, topical treatment combinations, oral antibiotics combined with topical treatments, and oral isotretinoin were the most cost-effective. Results showed uncertainty, as reflected in the wide confidence intervals around mean treatment rankings.ConclusionA range of treatments are cost-effective for the management of acne. Well-conducted studies are needed to examine the long-term clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the full range of acne treatments.
Project description:PurposeTo compare the effect of three commonly prescribed anti-inflammatory eye drops on corneal epithelial cells in vitro.MethodsThree different lines of human corneal epithelial cells were tested: primary cells cultured from donor tissue, commercially available primary cells, and immortalized cells. Cells were seeded on 96-well plates and treated with the following eye drops: cyclosporine 0.05%, lifitegrast 5%, and tacrolimus 0.03% or 0.1%. Exposure times tested were 30 seconds, 1 minute, 2 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, and 24 hours. Brightfield images and viability assays were analyzed 48 to 72 hours after the initiation of treatments. At least five replicates were tested per drug and time exposure.ResultsCommercially obtained primary cells showed reduced viability following 1 hour with tacrolimus 0.1% (8%; P = 0.043%) and 4 hours with tacrolimus 0.03% (17%; P = 0.042%). Lifitegrast exposure reduced primary cell viability after 4 hours (10%; P = 0.042). Cell viability in primary cells was not deleteriously affected following exposure to cyclosporine for up to 4 hours. A similar trend was observed in both primary cells cultured from donor tissue and immortalized human corneal epithelial cells, demonstrating greater decreases in cell viability in tacrolimus compared to lifitegrast and cyclosporine. Light microscopy imaging for analysis of cell morphology and confluence supported the results.ConclusionsTacrolimus showed the highest impact on corneal epithelium survival in vitro, and cyclosporine proved the most protective.Translational relevanceComparing anti-inflammatory eye drops on corneal epithelial cells in vitro may inform eye drop selection and development for clinical purposes.
Project description:Background: Inherited retinal dystrophies are a leading cause of irreversible blindness in children in the United States. Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors have improved central vision and cystoid macular edema in patients with retinal dystrophies, but few studies have assessed their efficacy in children. Materials and Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed with Institutional Review Board approval to identify pediatric patients with inherited retinal dystrophies who received topical brinzolamide at a single university center between 2008 and 2015. Serial visual acuity and central macular thicknesses were compared to assess the efficacy of brinzolamide. Results: Seven subjects were identified who met the inclusion criteria. Four had juvenile X-linked retinoschisis, two had retinitis pigmentosa, and one had Leber congenital amaurosis. All were prescribed brinzolamide thrice daily; however, one patient was completely non-compliant. Four of the six treated patients exhibited a mild decrease in central macular thickness in both eyes during the study with all six treated patients having significantly improved vision at the first endpoint, 33.2 ± 8.2 months after treatment initiation. For treated patients, average visual acuity (LogMAR) ± standard error of the mean improved from 0.5 ± 0.04 pre-treatment to 0.3 ± 0.1 at the second endpoint, 50.2 ± 7.3 months after treatment initiation. Conclusions: Mild anatomic improvement of macular cysts was seen in pediatric patients using brinzolamide. Visual acuity improvement occurred even without significant reduction in macular cysts. Further studies are needed to determine whether the beneficial effects of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are sustained in children with inherited retinal degenerations.