Dataset Information

Estimating Retinal Sensitivity Using Optical Coherence Tomography With Deep-Learning Algorithms in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2.

ABSTRACT: Importance:As currently used, microperimetry is a burdensome clinical testing modality for testing retinal sensitivity requiring long testing times and trained technicians. Objective:To create a deep-learning network that could directly estimate function from structure de novo to provide an en face high-resolution map of estimated retinal sensitivity. Design, Setting, and Participants:A cross-sectional imaging study using data collected between January 1, 2016, and November 30, 2017, from the Natural History Observation and Registry of macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel) evaluated 38 participants with confirmed MacTel from 2 centers. Main Outcomes and Measures:Mean absolute error of estimated compared with observed retinal sensitivity. Observed retinal sensitivity was obtained with fundus-controlled perimetry (microperimetry). Estimates of retinal sensitivity were made with deep-learning models that learned on superpositions of high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans and microperimetry results. Those predictions were used to create high-density en face sensitivity maps of the macula. Training, validation, and test sets were segregated at the patient level. Results:A total of 2499 microperimetry sensitivities were mapped onto 1708 OCT B-scans from 63 eyes of 38 patients (mean [SD] age, 74.3 [9.7] years; 15 men [39.5%]). The numbers of examples for our algorithm were 67?899 (103?053 after data augmentation) for training, 1695 for validation, and 1212 for testing. Mean absolute error results were 4.51 dB (95% CI, 4.36-4.65 dB) when using linear regression and 3.66 dB (95% CI, 3.53-3.78 dB) when using the LeNet model. Using a 49.9 million-variable deep-learning model, a mean absolute error of 3.36 dB (95% CI, 3.25-3.48 dB) of retinal sensitivity for validation and test was achieved. Correlation showed a high degree of agreement (Pearson correlation r?=?0.78). By paired Wilcoxon rank sum test, our model significantly outperformed these 2 baseline models (P?

SUBMITTER: Kihara Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6484597 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Estimating Retinal Sensitivity Using Optical Coherence Tomography With Deep-Learning Algorithms in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2.

Kihara Yuka Y Heeren Tjebo F C TFC Lee Cecilia S CS Wu Yue Y Xiao Sa S Tzaridis Simone S Holz Frank G FG Charbel Issa Peter P Egan Catherine A CA Lee Aaron Y AY

JAMA network open 20190201 2

<h4>Importance</h4>As currently used, microperimetry is a burdensome clinical testing modality for testing retinal sensitivity requiring long testing times and trained technicians.<h4>Objective</h4>To create a deep-learning network that could directly estimate function from structure de novo to provide an en face high-resolution map of estimated retinal sensitivity.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>A cross-sectional imaging study using data collected between January 1, 2016, and November ...[more]

PMID: 30735236

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo examine whether deep-learning denoised optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images could enhance automated macular ischemia quantification in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).MethodsThis retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study enrolled 74 patients with BRVO and 46 age-matched healthy subjects. The severity of macular ischemia was graded as mild, moderate, or severe. Denoised OCTA images were produced using a neural network model. Quantitative parameters derived from denoised images, including vessel density and nonperfusion area, were compared with those derived from the OCTA machine. The main outcome measures were correlations between quantitative parameters, and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) in classifying the severity of the macular ischemia.ResultsThe vessel density and nonperfusion area from denoised images were correlated strongly with the corresponding parameters from machine-derived images in control eyes and BRVO eyes with mild or moderate macular ischemia (all P < 0.001). However, no such correlation was found in eyes with severe macular ischemia. The vessel density and nonperfusion area from denoised images had significantly larger area under receiver operating characteristic curve than those derived from the original images in classifying moderate versus severe macular ischemia (0.927 vs 0.802 [P = 0.042] and 0.946 vs 0.797, [P = 0.022], respectively). There were no significant differences in the areas under receiver operating characteristic curve between the denoised images and the machine-derived parameters in classifying control versus BRVO, and mild versus moderate macular ischemia.ConclusionsA neural network model is useful for removing speckle noise on OCTA images and facilitating the automated grading of macular ischemia in eyes with BRVO.Translational relevanceDeep-learning denoised optical coherence tomography angiography images could enhance automated macular ischemia quantification.

Project description:PURPOSE:To detect macular perfusion defects in glaucoma using projection-resolved optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography. DESIGN:Prospective observation study. PARTICIPANTS:A total of 30 perimetric glaucoma and 30 age-matched normal participants were included. METHODS:One eye of each participant was imaged using 6×6-mm macular OCT angiography (OCTA) scan pattern by 70-kHz 840-nm spectral-domain OCT. Flow signal was calculated by the split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography algorithm. A projection-resolved OCTA (PR-OCTA) algorithm was used to remove flow projection artifacts. Four en face OCTA slabs were analyzed: the superficial vascular complex (SVC), intermediate capillary plexus (ICP), deep capillary plexus (DCP), and all-plexus retina (SVC + ICP + DCP). The vessel density (VD), defined as the percentage area occupied by flow pixels, was calculated from en face OCTA. A novel algorithm was used to adjust the vessel density to compensate for local variations in OCT signal strength. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Macular retinal VD, ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness, and visual field (VF) sensitivity. RESULTS:Focal capillary dropout could be visualized in the SVC, but not the ICP and DVP, in glaucomatous eyes. In the glaucoma group, the SVC and all-plexus retinal VD (mean ± standard deviation: 47.2%±7.1% and 73.5%±6.6%) were lower than in the normal group (60.5%±4.0% and 83.2%±4.2%, both P < 0.001, t test). The ICP and DCP VD were not significantly lower in the glaucoma group. Among the overall macular VD parameters, the SVC VD had the best diagnostic accuracy as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC). The accuracy was even better when the worse hemisphere (inferior or superior) was used, achieving an AROC of 0.983 and a sensitivity of 96.7% at a specificity of 95%. Among the glaucoma participants, the hemispheric SVC VD values were highly correlated with the corresponding GCC thickness and VF sensitivity (P < 0.003). The reflectance compensation step in VD calculation significantly improved repeatability, normal population variation, and correlation with VF and GCC thickness. CONCLUSIONS:On the basis of PR-OCTA, glaucoma preferentially affects perfusion in the SVC in the macula more than the deeper plexuses. Reflectance-compensated SVC VD measurement by PR-OCTA detected glaucoma with high accuracy and could be useful in the clinical evaluation of glaucoma.

Project description:Importance:Whether optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) outperforms OCT to detect glaucoma remains inconclusive. Objective:To compare (1) the diagnostic performance for detection of glaucoma and (2) the structure-function association between inner macular vessel density and inner macular thickness. Design, Setting, and Participants:This cross-sectional study included 115 patients with glaucoma and 35 healthy individuals for measurements of retinal thickness and retinal vessel density, segmented between the anterior boundary of internal limiting membrane and the posterior boundary of the inner plexiform layer, over the 3 × 3-mm2 macula using swept-source OCT. All participants were Chinese. Visual sensitivity corresponding to the 3 × 3-mm2 macular region was expressed in unlogged 1/lambert for investigation of the structure-function associations. Diagnostic performance was evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). The study was conducted between January 12, 2016, and December 12, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures:Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and R2 analysis. Results:Of the 115 patients with glaucoma, 42 (36.5%) were women (mean [SD] age, 53.5 [13.4] years); of the 35 individuals with healthy eyes, 25 (71.4%) were women (age, 60.6 [5.9] years). Inner macular vessel density and thickness were 4.3% (95% CI, 2.4%-6.1%) and 21.1 μm (95% CI, 17.4-24.9 μm) smaller, respectively, in eyes with glaucoma compared with healthy eyes. The AUC of mean inner macular thickness for glaucoma detection was greater than that of mean inner macular vessel density (difference, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.01-0.31; P = .03). At 90% specificity, the sensitivity of mean inner macular thicknesses for detection of glaucoma was greater than that of mean inner macular vessel densities (difference, 29.2%; 95% CI, 11.5%-64.6%; P = .02). The strength of the structure-function association was stronger for mean inner macular thickness than mean inner macular vessel density in the linear (difference in R2 = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.22-0.54; P < .001) and nonlinear (difference in R2 = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.21-0.51; P < .001) regression models. Conclusions and Relevance:In this study, OCT measurement of inner macular thickness shows a higher diagnostic performance to detect glaucoma and a stronger structure-function association than the currently used OCT-A measurement of inner macular vessel density. These findings may suggest that OCT-A of the macula has a limited role in the diagnostic evaluation of glaucoma.

Dataset Information

Estimating Retinal Sensitivity Using Optical Coherence Tomography With Deep-Learning Algorithms in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2.

Publications

Estimating Retinal Sensitivity Using Optical Coherence Tomography With Deep-Learning Algorithms in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets