Dataset Information

Biological Validation of RNA Sequencing Data from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Primary Melanomas.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Initiatives such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) have generated high-quality, multi-platform molecular data from thousands of frozen tumor samples. While these initiatives have provided invaluable insight into cancer biology, a tremendous potential resource remains largely untapped in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples that are more readily available, but which can present technical challenges due to crosslinking of fragile molecules such as RNA.

Materials and methods

We extracted RNA from FFPE primary melanomas and assessed two gene expression platforms -- genome-wide RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and targeted NanoString -- for their ability to generate coherent biological signals. To do so, we generated an improved approach to quantifying gene expression pathways, in which we refine pathway scores through correlation-guided gene subsetting. We also make comparisons to the TCGA and other publicly available melanoma datasets.

Results

Comparison of the gene expression patterns to each other, to established biological modules, and to clinical and immunohistochemical data confirmed the fidelity of biological signals from both platforms using FFPE samples to known biology. Moreover, correlations with patient outcome data were consistent with previous frozen-tissue-based studies.

Conclusion

FFPE samples from previously difficult-to-access cancer types - such as small primary melanomas - represents a valuable and previously unexploited source of analyte for RNA-seq and NanoString platforms. This work provides an important step towards the use of such platforms to unlock novel molecular underpinnings and inform future biologically-driven clinical decisions.

SUBMITTER: Kwong LN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6498859 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Utilization of RNA sequencing methods to measure gene expression from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples in translational research and clinical trials requires reliable interpretation of the impact of pre-analytical variables on the data obtained, particularly the methods used to preserve samples and to purify RNA. METHODS:Matched tissue samples from 12 breast cancers were fresh frozen (FF) and preserved in RNAlater or fixed in formalin and processed as FFPE tissue. Total RNA was extracted and purified from FF samples using the Qiagen RNeasy kit, and in duplicate from FFPE tissue sections using three different kits (Norgen, Qiagen and Roche). All RNA samples underwent whole transcriptome RNA sequencing (wtRNAseq) and targeted RNA sequencing for 31 transcripts included in a signature of sensitivity to endocrine therapy. We assessed the effect of RNA extraction kit on the reliability of gene expression levels using linear mixed-effects model analysis, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and differential analysis. All protein-coding genes in the wtRNAseq and three gene expression signatures for breast cancer were assessed for concordance. RESULTS:Despite variable quality of the RNA extracted from FFPE samples by different kits, all had similar concordance of overall gene expression from wtRNAseq between matched FF and FFPE samples (median CCC 0.63-0.66) and between technical replicates (median expression difference 0.13-0.22). More than half of genes were differentially expressed between FF and FFPE, but with low fold change (median |LFC| 0.31-0.34). Two out of three breast cancer signatures studied were highly robust in all samples using any kit, whereas the third signature was similarly discordant irrespective of the kit used. The targeted RNAseq assay was concordant between FFPE and FF samples using any of the kits (CCC 0.91-0.96). CONCLUSIONS:The selection of kit to purify RNA from FFPE did not influence the overall quality of results from wtRNAseq, thus variable reproducibility of gene signatures probably relates to the reliability of individual gene selected and possibly to the algorithm. Targeted RNAseq showed promising performance for clinical deployment of quantitative assays in breast cancer from FFPE samples, although numerical scores were not identical to those from wtRNAseq and would require calibration.