Dataset Information

Case series of cancer patients who developed cholecystitis related to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a promising novel class of cancer therapy, but immune-mediated adverse events can complicate ICI treatment. Acute cholecystitis in patients receiving ICI therapy has not been characterized. We aimed to describe the clinical features of patients who developed ICI-related cholecystitis.

Methods

We evaluated a case series of patients at a tertiary cancer center who received ICI therapy and developed cholecystitis, diagnosed by clinical presentation and diagnostic imaging, during 2010-2018. Patients with a history of chronic cholecystitis or other etiologies of acute cholecystitis, such as cholelithiasis, were excluded. A chi-square test was used to compare the frequency of cholecystitis between ICI regimens. Kaplan-Meier and log rank analyses were used to compare survival between subgroups.

Results

Of the 4253 patients who received ICIs in the study period, 25 (0.6%) patients developed suspected ICI-related cholecystitis. Alternatively, of the 31,426 cancer-matched patients who received non-ICI therapy, 72 (0.2%) developed acalculous cholecystitis (P < 0.001). Among the 25 included patients, the median time from ICI initiation to cholecystitis was 6 months (range, 0.1-31 months). Fifteen (60%) patients received an inhibitor of programmed death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) or of its ligand (anti-PD-L1) as a single agent, and 10 (40%) patients received an inhibitor of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) therapy alone or combined with anti-PD-1/L1. Anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy was associated with a higher risk of cholecystitis (P = 0.006). ICI therapy was discontinued in 20 patients, in three (12%) as a result of acute cholecystitis. Two (8%) patients developed sepsis, and four (16%) had perforation of the gallbladder wall. Five (20%) patients underwent surgical cholecystectomy, and eight (32%) underwent percutaneous drainage. Five (20%) patients were treated with steroids; two of them required surgery. Ten (40%) patients were able to restart ICI therapy. Patients who received a combination of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1/L1 had more complications of cholecystitis than did patients who received either agent alone (P = 0.03).

Conclusions

ICI treatment can result in a clinical condition similar to typical acute cholecystitis in a minority of patients. ICI-related cholecystitis should be managed in a similar fashion to typical cholecystitis. The efficacy of steroids for the treatment of ICI-related cholecystitis is unclear.

SUBMITTER: Abu-Sbeih H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6499962 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related myositis with myocarditis is a rare but potentially fatal immune-related adverse event. However, its clinical features, response to immunosuppressive treatment, and prognosis remain poorly understood. Here, we describe the clinical course of patients with ICI-related myositis overlapping with myocarditis treated at our institution and a systematic review focusing on the response to immunosuppressive therapy. Methods: We identified patients who developed ICI-induced myositis with myocarditis and were treated at our hospital using a retrospective chart review of electronic medical records. For the systematic review, studies reporting ICI-induced myositis with myocarditis were identified using the Cochrane Library and PubMed databases. Results: Of the 625 patients treated with ICIs, four developed myositis with concurrent myocarditis. All the patients received immunosuppressive therapy. We assessed the activity of myocarditis and myositis based on temporal changes in troponin and creatine kinase (CK) levels. In all patients, peak troponin values appeared later than the peak CK values (median, 17 days). The median time from the start of ICI therapy to the peak of troponin and CK levels was 42.5 and 28 days, respectively. In all patients, CK levels decreased rapidly and steadily after the initiation of immunosuppressants. However, troponin levels were unstable and increased. In all patients, CK levels normalized within one month (range, 12–27 days), but troponin levels took several months to normalize (range, 84–161 days). Fourteen cases of ICI-related myositis with myocarditis were included in the systematic review. Of the 14 cases, 12 (86%) had their CK level decreased after the initial steroid treatment, but the troponin level increased and was higher than that before the start of treatment. In addition, the peak troponin values appeared later than the peak CK values (a median of 6.5 days). Eight (89%) of 9 long-term follow-up patients had troponin levels above the normal range even after CK normalization. Conclusion: In most cases of ICI-related myositis with myocarditis, troponin levels increased after the initial steroid treatment despite decreased CK levels, and exceeded pre-steroid levels. In addition, troponin remained elevated for several months after CK normalized.

Project description:BackgroundAlong with the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors comes a surge in immune-related toxicity. Here, we review the currently available data regarding neurological immune adverse events, and more specifically aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, and present treatment and diagnostic recommendations. Furthermore, we present five cases of immunotherapy-induced aseptic meningitis and encephalitis treated at our institution.Recent findingsNeurological immune-related adverse events, including aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, secondary to checkpoint inhibitors are a rare but complex and clinically relevant entity, comprising a wide range of diseases, most often presenting with symptoms with a wide range of differential diagnoses. Our case-series highlights the challenges of such entities and the importance of properly identifying and managing aseptic meningitis and encephalitis.SummaryCheckpoint inhibitor-induced meningoencephalitis warrants prompt investigations and treatment. Properly diagnosing aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, or mixed presentations may guide the treatment decision, as highlighted by our case-series. After rapid exclusion of alternative diagnoses, urgent corticosteroids are the therapeutic backbone but this could change in favour of highly specific cytokine-directed treatment options.Plain language summaryAseptic meningitis and encephalitis with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a single centre case-series and review of the literature Over the course of the past decade, checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer care. With their favourable toxicity profile and potential for durable and deep responses, they have become ubiquitous across the field of oncology. Furthermore, combination checkpoint inhibitors are also gaining ground, with increased efficacy and, unfortunately, immune-related toxicity. While there are guidelines based on extensive clinical experience for frequent adverse events, uncommon entities are less readily identified and treated. Neurological immune-related adverse events secondary to checkpoint inhibitors are a rare but complex entity, comprising a wide range of diseases, most often presenting with aspecific symptoms. In this paper, we discuss a single institution case-series of patients with autoimmune aseptic meningitis and encephalitis, and we perform a narrative literature review on this subject. We conclude with our treatment recommendations based on available evidence.