Dataset Information

Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data.

ABSTRACT: Read-across has become a primary approach to fill data gaps for chemical safety assessments. Chemical similarity based on structure, reactivity, and physic-chemical property information is a traditional approach applied for read-across toxicity studies. However, toxicity mechanisms are usually complicated in a biological system, so only using chemical similarity to perform the read-across for new compounds was not satisfactory for most toxicity endpoints, especially when the chemically similar compounds show dissimilar toxicities. This study aims to develop an enhanced read-across method for chemical toxicity predictions. To this end, we used two large toxicity datasets for read-across purposes. One consists of 3979 compounds with Ames mutagenicity data, and the other contains 7332 compounds with rat acute oral toxicity data. First, biological data for all compounds in these two datasets were obtained by querying thousands of PubChem bioassays. The PubChem bioassays with at least five compounds from either of these two datasets showing active responses were selected to generate comprehensive bioprofiles. The read-across studies were performed by using chemical similarity search only and also by using a hybrid similarity search based on both chemical descriptors and bioprofiles. Compared to traditional read-across based on chemical similarity, the hybrid read-across approach showed improved accuracy of predictions for both Ames mutagenicity and acute oral toxicity. Furthermore, we could illustrate potential toxicity mechanisms by analyzing the bioprofiles used for this hybrid read-across study. The results of this study indicate that the new hybrid read-across approach could be an applicable computational tool for chemical toxicity predictions. In this way, the bottleneck of traditional read-across studies can be overcome by introducing public biological data into the traditional process. The incorporation of bioprofiles generated from the additional biological data for compounds can partially solve the "activity cliff" issue and reveal their potential toxicity mechanisms. This study leads to a promising direction to utilize data-driven approaches for computational toxicology studies in the big data era.

SUBMITTER: Guo Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6508079 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data.

Guo Yajie Y Zhao Linlin L Zhang Xiaoyi X Zhu Hao H

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 20190417

Read-across has become a primary approach to fill data gaps for chemical safety assessments. Chemical similarity based on structure, reactivity, and physic-chemical property information is a traditional approach applied for read-across toxicity studies. However, toxicity mechanisms are usually complicated in a biological system, so only using chemical similarity to perform the read-across for new compounds was not satisfactory for most toxicity endpoints, especially when the chemically similar c ...[more]

PMID: 31004930

Similar Datasets

Project description:In an effort to address a major challenge in chemical safety assessment, alternative approaches for characterizing systemic effect levels, a predictive model was developed. Systemic effect levels were curated from ToxRefDB, HESS-DB and COSMOS-DB from numerous study types totaling 4379 in vivo studies for 1247 chemicals. Observed systemic effects in mammalian models are a complex function of chemical dynamics, kinetics, and inter- and intra-individual variability. To address this complex problem, systemic effect levels were modeled at the study-level by leveraging study covariates (e.g., study type, strain, administration route) in addition to multiple descriptor sets, including chemical (ToxPrint, PaDEL, and Physchem), biological (ToxCast), and kinetic descriptors. Using random forest modeling with cross-validation and external validation procedures, study-level covariates alone accounted for approximately 15% of the variance reducing the root mean squared error (RMSE) from 0.96 log10 to 0.85 log10 mg/kg/day, providing a baseline performance metric (lower expectation of model performance). A consensus model developed using a combination of study-level covariates, chemical, biological, and kinetic descriptors explained a total of 43% of the variance with an RMSE of 0.69 log10 mg/kg/day. A benchmark model (upper expectation of model performance) was also developed with an RMSE of 0.5 log10 mg/kg/day by incorporating study-level covariates and the mean effect level per chemical. To achieve a representative chemical-level prediction, the minimum study-level predicted and observed effect level per chemical were compared reducing the RMSE from 1.0 to 0.73 log10 mg/kg/day, equivalent to 87% of predictions falling within an order-of-magnitude of the observed value. Although biological descriptors did not improve model performance, the final model was enriched for biological descriptors that indicated xenobiotic metabolism gene expression, oxidative stress, and cytotoxicity, demonstrating the importance of accounting for kinetics and non-specific bioactivity in predicting systemic effect levels. Herein, we generated an externally predictive model of systemic effect levels for use as a safety assessment tool and have generated forward predictions for over 30,000 chemicals.

Dataset Information

Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data.

Publications

Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets