Dataset Information

Silent progression in disease activity-free relapsing multiple sclerosis.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Rates of worsening and evolution to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) may be substantially lower in actively treated patients compared to natural history studies from the pretreatment era. Nonetheless, in our recently reported prospective cohort, more than half of patients with relapsing MS accumulated significant new disability by the 10th year of follow-up. Notably, "no evidence of disease activity" at 2 years did not predict long-term stability. Here, we determined to what extent clinical relapses and radiographic evidence of disease activity contribute to long-term disability accumulation.

Methods

Disability progression was defined as an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 1.5, 1.0, or 0.5 (or greater) from baseline EDSS = 0, 1.0-5.0, and 5.5 or higher, respectively, assessed from baseline to year 5 (±1 year) and sustained to year 10 (±1 year). Longitudinal analysis of relative brain volume loss used a linear mixed model with sex, age, disease duration, and HLA-DRB1*15:01 as covariates.

Results

Relapses were associated with a transient increase in disability over 1-year intervals (p = 0.012) but not with confirmed disability progression (p = 0.551). Relative brain volume declined at a greater rate among individuals with disability progression compared to those who remained stable (p < 0.05).

Interpretation

Long-term worsening is common in relapsing MS patients, is largely independent of relapse activity, and is associated with accelerated brain atrophy. We propose the term silent progression to describe the insidious disability that accrues in many patients who satisfy traditional criteria for relapsing-remitting MS. Ann Neurol 2019;85:653-666.

SUBMITTER: University of California, San Francisco MS-EPIC Team

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6518998 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesDisease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) is highly variable, and there are limited prospective studies on predictors of disease outcomes. The goal of this study is to identify and assess patient characteristics in MS that predict disease activity and worsening.MethodsThe study population consisted of a prospective cohort of 1,008 participants with relapsing-remitting onset MS enrolled in the CombiRx trial. Cox regression analysis was used to determine hazard ratio (HR) associations between baseline (BL) demographics, clinical history, MRI metrics, and treatment with outcomes of time to first new disease activity over up to 7 years of follow-up including relapse, MRI activity, and disease worsening.ResultsOne thousand eight participants were randomized, with 959 eligible for assessment of disease activity and worsening on follow-up. In multivariable models, the risk of relapse was higher in participants younger than 38 years at BL than in those older (HR range 1.36-1.43), with the presence of gadolinium (Gd)+ lesions at BL (HR 1.38, [95% confidence interval, CI 1.14, 1.67]) and with BL EDSS ≥3.5 vs <3.5 (HR range 1.63-1.67). The risk of new MRI activity was higher in younger participants (HR range 1.58-1.84), with higher preexisting lesion counts greater than the median lesion count with ≥71 T2 hyperintense lesions vs <71 (HR 1.50, [95% CI 1.27, 1.77]), with the presence of BL Gd+ lesions (HR 1.75, [95% CI 1.49, 2.06]), and higher BL T2 lesion volume (HR 1.02 for every unit increase in baseline volume, [95% CI 1.01, 1.03]). The risk of new MRI activity was lower in those receiving combination therapy compared with those that in those receiving either glatiramer acetate (HR range 0.67-0.68) or interferon beta-1a (HR range 0.68-0.70). The risk of disease worsening was higher for those with higher T2 volume (HR for 1 unit increase in volume 1.01, 95% CI 1.004, 1.03) and BL EDSS <2 (HR range 2.79-2.96). There were no associations between sex, race, and disease duration on relapse, MRI activity, or disease worsening in the multivariable analysis.DiscussionProspective data from a large clinical trial cohort show that younger MS patients with high BL relapses and MRI lesion burden have the highest risk of subsequent disease activity.Trial registration informationClinical trial registration number NCT00211887. CombiRx was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00211887) on September 21, 2005. Study enrollment began in January 2005.

Project description:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:The role of gray matter in multiple sclerosis is increasingly evident; however, conventional images demonstrate limitations in cortical lesion identification. Perfusion imaging appears sensitive to changes in tissue type and disease severity in MS. We sought to use bookend perfusion to quantify parameters in healthy controls and normal-appearing and lesional tissue at different relapsing-remitting MS stages. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Thirty-nine patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 19 age-matched healthy controls were prospectively recruited. The Minimal Assessment of Cognitive Function in MS battery was used to assess cognitive performance. Perfusion parameters, including cerebral blood flow and volume and mean transit time, were compared for healthy controls and normal-appearing and lesional tissue for all study groups. Dispersion of perfusion measures for white matter lesions and cortical lesions was assessed. RESULTS:Twenty of the 39 patients with relapsing-remitting MS were cognitively impaired. Significant differences were displayed between all relapsing-remitting MS subgroups and healthy controls in all comparisons except for normal-appearing gray matter CBV between healthy controls and unimpaired patients with relapsing-remitting MS and for all normal-appearing white matter perfusion parameters between healthy controls and unimpaired patients with relapsing-remitting MS. White matter lesion but not cortical lesion perfusion was significantly reduced in cognitively impaired patients with relapsing-remitting MS versus unimpaired patients with relapsing-remitting MS. Perfusion reduction with disease progression was greater in normal-appearing gray matter and normal-appearing white matter compared with cortical lesions and white matter lesions. Smaller dispersion was observed for cortical lesions compared with white matter lesions for each perfusion parameter. CONCLUSIONS:Quantitative GM and WM analysis demonstrated significant but disproportionate white matter lesion, cortical lesion, normal-appearing white matter, and normal-appearing gray matter changes present between healthy controls and patients with relapsing-remitting MS with and without cognitive impairment, necessitating absolute rather than relative lesion perfusion measurement.

Project description:ImportanceA number of officially approved disease-modifying drugs (DMD) are currently available for the early intervention in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). The aim of the present study was to systematically evaluate the effect of DMDs on disability progression in RRMS.MethodsWe performed a systematic review on MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases to include all available placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of RRMS patients that reported absolute numbers or percentages of disability progression during each study period. Observational studies, case series, case reports, RCTs without placebo subgroups and studies reporting the use of RRMS therapies that are not still officially approved were excluded. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated in each study protocol to express the comparison of disability progression in RRMS patients treated with a DMD and those RRMS patients receiving placebo. The mixed-effects model was used to calculate both the pooled point estimate in each subgroup and the overall estimates.ResultsDMDs for RRMS were found to have a significantly lower risk of disability progression compared to placebo (RR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.66-0.79; p<0.001), with no evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias. In subsequent subgroup analyses, neither dichotomization of DMDs as "first" and "second" line RRMS therapies [(RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.65-0.80) vs. (RR = 0.72, 95% = 0.57-0.91); p = 0.96] nor the route of administration (injectable or oral) [RR = 0.75 (95% CI = 0.64-0.87) vs. RR = 0.74 (95% CI = 0.66-0.83); p = 0.92] had a differential effect on the risk of disability progression. Either considerable (5-20%) or significant (>20%) rates of loss to follow-up were reported in many study protocols, while financial and/or other support from pharmaceutical industries with a clear conflict of interest on the study outcomes was documented in all included studies.ConclusionsAvailable DMD are effective in reducing disability progression in patients with RRMS, independently of the route of administration and their classification as "first" or "second" line therapies. Attrition bias needs to be taken into account in the interpretation of these findings.