Dataset Information

The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs.

ABSTRACT: CONTEXT:The Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) was first fielded in 2014 and is the largest public health workforce survey in the nation. This article elucidates the methods used for the 2017 PH WINS fielding. PROGRAM OR POLICY:PH WINS was fielded to a nationally representative sample of State Health Agency Central Office (SHA-CO) staff, as well as local health department (LHD) staff. The instrument largely mirrored 2014, though the training needs section was revised, and a validated item measuring burnout in staff was added. IMPLEMENTATION:Staff lists were collected directly from all participating state and local agencies. Forty-seven state health agencies (SHAs), 26 large LHDs, and 71 midsize LHDs participated. All SHAs were surveyed using a census approach. The nationally representative SHA-CO frame is representative of all central office staff members. The nationally representative local frame was a complex survey design, wherein staff from LHDs were randomly sampled across 20 strata, based on agency size and geographic region. Staff were also contributed with certainty from large LHDs in nondecentralized states. The frame is representative of staff at LHDs serving more than 25 000 people and with 25 or more staff members. Other LHDs are excluded, and so PH WINS is not representative of smaller LHDs. Balanced repeated replication weights were used to adjust variance estimates for the complex design. EVALUATION:Overall, 47 604 people responded to PH WINS in 2017 across all frames. PH WINS 2017 achieved a response rate of 48%. The design effect for the SHA-CO frame was 1.46 and was 16.42 for the local frame. DISCUSSION:PH WINS now offers a nationally representative sample of both SHA-CO and LHD staff across 4 major domains: workplace environment, training needs, emerging concepts in public health, and demographics. Both practice and academia can use PH WINS to better understand the perceptions and needs of staff, address training gaps, and work to recruit and retain quality staff.

SUBMITTER: Leider JP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6519781 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar/Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs.

Leider Jonathon P JP Pineau Vicki V Bogaert Kyle K Ma Qiao Q Sellers Katie K

Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP 20190301

<h4>Context</h4>The Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs Survey (PH WINS) was first fielded in 2014 and is the largest public health workforce survey in the nation. This article elucidates the methods used for the 2017 PH WINS fielding.<h4>Program or policy</h4>PH WINS was fielded to a nationally representative sample of State Health Agency Central Office (SHA-CO) staff, as well as local health department (LHD) staff. The instrument largely mirrored 2014, though the training needs section ...[more]

PMID: 30720617

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWith population aging, the economic burden of dementia is growing in Europe. Understanding the economic costs of dementia provides an important basis for prioritization in public health policy and resource allocation.MethodsWe calculate the economic costs of dementia, including both direct medical and social care costs and indirect costs of informal care, for 11 countries in Europe. Costs are estimated using population-representative data from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe from 2004 to 2017, supplemented with external information about wages of care workers, dementia prevalence, and fraction of direct costs paid by other sources. We report overall costs for persons, both living and deceased with dementia and also isolate the costs attributable to dementia by estimating regression models that relate a given cost component to dementia while controlling for coexisting conditions and demographics. We make the monetary data comparable by adjusting for inflation and Purchasing Power Parity to 2018 euros.FindingsAverage annual direct out of pocket costs that can be attributed to dementia vary between EUR 253(95% CI: -17 to 522) and EUR 859 (95% CI: -587 to 2306) across countries, but are not statistically significant after adjustment for multiple testing. Average annual hours of informal care that can be attributed to dementia vary between 163 (95% CI: 27-299) and 1051 (95% CI: 15-2086) annual hours across countries, and are statistically significant in all countries before adjustment for multiple testing, and in seven out of 11 countries after this adjustment. Combining these estimates with external wage information in each country implies a burden between EUR 2687.4 (95% CI: 704.5 to 4670.3) and EUR 15,468 (95% CI: 8088.1 to 22,847.9) per individual with dementia per year depending on the country. When combined with external estimates of the fraction of direct costs covered by other payment sources (insurance, government) and numbers of individuals with dementia, estimates of the total costs of dementia at the country level vary from EUR 162.9 million (95% CI: 56.3 to 269.5) in Estonia to EUR 32,606.9 (95% CI: 13,893.9 to 51,319.9) in Germany. Informal care costs account for the largest proportion of costs attributable to dementia in all European countries, varying between about 50% and about 90%.InterpretationThe economic burden of dementia on families in terms of direct out-of-pocket and informal care costs varies greatly by country, depending on the health and social care systems. Informal care costs accounts for the largest proportion of costs, requiring policy attention to dementia care provision and costs.FundingThis project is funded by the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, USA (R01 AG030153).

Project description:In Ethiopia, little is known about the extent of out-of-pocket health expenditures and the associated financial hardships at national and regional levels. We estimated the incidence of both catastrophic and impoverishing health expenditures using data from the 2015/16 Ethiopian household consumption and expenditure and welfare monitoring surveys. We computed incidence of catastrophic health expenditures (CHE) at 10% and 25% thresholds of total household consumption and 40% threshold of household capacity to pay, and impoverishing health expenditures (IHE) using Ethiopia's national poverty line (ETB 7184 per adult per year). Around 2.1% (SE: 0.2, P < 0.001) of households would face CHE with a 10% threshold of total consumption, and 0.9% (SE: 0.1, P < 0.001) of households would encounter IHE, annually in Ethiopia. CHE rates were high in the regions of Afar (5.8%, SE: 1.0, P < 0.001) and Benshangul-Gumuz (4.0%, SE: 0.8, P < 0.001). Oromia (n = 902 000), Amhara (n = 275 000) and Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) (n = 268 000) regions would have the largest numbers of affected households, due to large population size. The IHE rates would also show similar patterns: high rates in Afar (5.0%, SE: 0.96, P < 0.001), Oromia (1.1%, SE: 0.22, P < 0.001) and Benshangul-Gumuz (0.9%, SE: 0.4, P = 0.02); a large number of households would be impoverished in Oromia (n = 356 000) and Amhara (n = 202 000) regions. In summary, a large number of households is facing financial hardship in Ethiopia, particularly in Afar, Benshangul-Gumuz, Oromia, Amhara and SNNP regions and this number would likely increase with greater health services utilization. We recommend regional-level analyses on services coverage to be conducted as some of the estimated low CHE/IHE regional values might be due to low services coverage. Periodic analyses on the financial hardship status of households could also be monitored to infer progress towards universal health coverage.

Dataset Information

The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs.

Publications

The Methods of PH WINS 2017: Approaches to Refreshing Nationally Representative State-Level Estimates and Creating Nationally Representative Local-Level Estimates of Public Health Workforce Interests and Needs.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets