Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Using an individual-based model to assess common biases in lek-based count data to estimate population trajectories of lesser prairie-chickens.


ABSTRACT: Researchers and managers are often interested in monitoring the underlying state of a population (e.g., abundance), yet error in the observation process might mask underlying changes due to imperfect detection and availability for sampling. Additional heterogeneity can be introduced into a monitoring program when male-based surveys are used as an index for the total population. Often, male-based surveys are used for avian species, as males are conspicuous and more easily monitored than females. To determine if male-based lek surveys capture changes or trends in population abundance based on female survival and reproduction, we developed a virtual ecologist approach using the lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) as an example. Our approach used an individual-based model to simulate lek counts based on female vital rate data, included models where detection and lek attendance probabilities were <1, and was analyzed using both unadjusted counts and an N-mixture model to compare estimates of population abundance and growth rates. Using lek counts to estimate population growth rates without accounting for detection probability or density-based lek attendance consistently biased population growth rates and abundance estimates. Our results therefore suggest that lek-based surveys used without accounting for lek attendance and detection probability may miss important trends in population changes. Rather than population-level inference, lek-based surveys not accounting for lek attendance and detection probability may instead be better for inferring broad-scale range shifts of lesser prairie-chicken populations in a presence/absence framework.

SUBMITTER: Ross BE 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6524812 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Using an individual-based model to assess common biases in lek-based count data to estimate population trajectories of lesser prairie-chickens.

Ross Beth E BE   Sullins Daniel S DS   Haukos David A DA  

PloS one 20190517 5


Researchers and managers are often interested in monitoring the underlying state of a population (e.g., abundance), yet error in the observation process might mask underlying changes due to imperfect detection and availability for sampling. Additional heterogeneity can be introduced into a monitoring program when male-based surveys are used as an index for the total population. Often, male-based surveys are used for avian species, as males are conspicuous and more easily monitored than females.  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9281109 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3708951 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10828740 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8452035 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6687084 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5042413 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4972930 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4315899 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3728207 | biostudies-literature
| PRJEB39471 | ENA