Dataset Information

Validation of the Core Seven-Emotions Inventory - short form.

ABSTRACT:

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of short form of the Core Seven Emotions Inventory (CSEI-s) scale.

Methods

The participants were third-grade Korean Medicine University students As with the original CSEI, the scales in the short form (CSEI-s) were composed of seven factors and consisted of 28 items in total. The internal consistency coefficient was calculated, and a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to verify the reliability of the short form scale. Finally, to verify the validity of the abbreviated scale, a correlation analysis with the abbreviated scale and the CSEI-s scale was conducted.

Results

A 178 among 200 initial participants were included in the analysis (mean age: 24.5 years). The results of the exploratory factor analysis made from the 28 items of the seven factors of the CSEI-s showed that the factor loadings were as high as 0.64-0.89, excluding the tenth item of fear (0.52), and the model fit also had a good confirmatory factor with the analysis result. The results of the reliability verification showed that the Cronbach ? values of all seven subscales of the short-form CSEI scale were 0.7 or higher, and the overall reliability was 0.83. A factor analysis revealed that the factor loadings were adequate, and their reliability and validity were confirmed for the CSEI-s scale, making it applicable to measuring the core seven emotions of patients in clinical practice.

Conclusion

CSEI-s scale may apply to measure core emotions of the patient in a clinical setting.

SUBMITTER: Cheong MJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6536744 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Validation of the Core Seven-Emotions Inventory - short form.

Cheong Moon Joo MJ Lee Go-Eun GE Lee Youngseop Y Bae Kwang-Ho KH Kang Yeonseok Y Kim Jae-Hyo JH Lyu Yeoung-Su YS Kang Hyung Won HW

Integrative medicine research 20190406 2

<h4>Background</h4>This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of short form of the Core Seven Emotions Inventory (CSEI-s) scale.<h4>Methods</h4>The participants were third-grade Korean Medicine University students As with the original CSEI, the scales in the short form (CSEI-s) were composed of seven factors and consisted of 28 items in total. The internal consistency coefficient was calculated, and a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to verify the reliability of the shor ...[more]

PMID: 31193553

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCardiac distress may be viewed as a persistent negative emotional state that spans multiple psychosocial domains and challenges a patient's capacity to cope with living with their heart condition. The Cardiac Distress Inventory (CDI) is a disease-specific clinical assessment tool that captures the complexity of this distress. In busy settings such as primary care, cardiac rehabilitation, and counselling services, however, there is a need to administer briefer tools to aid in identification and screening. The aim of the present study was to develop a short, valid screening version of the CDI.MethodsA total of 405 participants reporting an acute coronary event in the previous 12 months was recruited from three hospitals, through social media and by direct enrolment on the study website. Participants completed an online survey which included the full version of the CDI and general distress measures including the Kessler K6, Patient Health Questionnaire-4, and Emotion Thermometers. Relationship of the CDI with these instruments, Rasch analysis model fit and clinical expertise were all used to select items for the short form (CDI-SF). Construct validity and receiver operating characteristics in relation to the Kessler K6 were examined.ResultsThe final 12 item CDI-SF exhibited excellent internal consistency indicative of unidimensionality and good convergent and discriminant validity in comparison to clinical status measures, all indicative of good construct validity. Using the K6 validated cutoff of ≥ 18 as the reference variable, the CDI-SF had a very high Area Under the Curve (AUC) (AUC = 0.913 (95% CI: 0.88 to 0.94). A CDI-SF score of ≥ 13 was found to indicate general cardiac distress which may warrant further investigation using the original CDI.ConclusionThe psychometric findings detailed here indicate that the CDI-SF provides a brief psychometrically sound screening measure indicative of general cardiac distress, that can be used in both clinical and research settings.

Dataset Information

Validation of the Core Seven-Emotions Inventory - short form.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Validation of the Core Seven-Emotions Inventory - short form.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets