Dataset Information

Using adaptive magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy for treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Adaptive magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) can escalate dose to tumors while minimizing dose to normal tissue. We evaluated outcomes of inoperable pancreatic cancer patients treated using MRgRT with and without dose escalation.

Methods

We reviewed 44 patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer treated with MRgRT. Treatments included conventional fractionation, hypofractionation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Patients were stratified into high-dose (biologically effective dose [BED₁₀ ] >70) and standard-dose groups (BED₁₀ ≤70). Overall survival (OS), freedom from local failure (FFLF) and freedom from distant failure (FFDF) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was performed to identify predictors of OS. Acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was assessed for 6 weeks after completion of RT.

Results

Median follow-up was 17 months. High-dose patients (n = 24, 55%) had statistically significant improvement in 2-year OS (49% vs 30%, P = 0.03) and trended towards significance for 2-year FFLF (77% vs 57%, P = 0.15) compared to standard-dose patients (n = 20, 45%). FFDF at 18 months in high-dose vs standard-dose groups was 24% vs 48%, respectively (P = 0.92). High-dose radiation (HR: 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.94; P = 0.03) and duration of induction chemotherapy (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.98; P = 0.03) were significantly correlated with OS on univariate analysis but neither factor was independently predictive on multivariate analysis. Grade 3+ GI toxicity occurred in three patients in the standard-dose group and did not occur in the high-dose group.

Conclusions

Patients treated with dose-escalated MRgRT demonstrated improved OS. Prospective evaluation of high-dose RT regimens with standardized treatment parameters in inoperable pancreatic cancer patients is warranted.

SUBMITTER: Rudra S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6536981 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeNearly all patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) eventually die of progressive cancer after exhausting treatment options. Although distant metastases (DMs) are a common cause of death, autopsy studies have shown that locoregional progression may be directly responsible for up to one-third of PDAC-related deaths. Ablative stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (A-SMART) is a novel treatment strategy that appears to improve locoregional control compared with nonablative radiation therapy, potentially leading to improved overall survival.Methods and materialsA single-institution retrospective analysis was performed of patients with nonmetastatic inoperable PDAC treated between 2018 to 2020 using the MRIdian Linac with induction chemotherapy, followed by 5-fraction A-SMART. We identified causes of death that occurred after A-SMART.ResultsA total of 62 patients were evaluated, of whom 42 (67.7%) had died. The median follow-up time was 18.6 months from diagnosis and 11.0 months from A-SMART. Patients had locally advanced (72.6%), borderline resectable (22.6%), or resectable but medically inoperable PDAC (4.8%). All patients received induction chemotherapy, typically leucovorin calcium (folinic acid), fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin (69.4%) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (24.2%). The median prescribed dose was 50 Gy (range, 40-50), corresponding to a median biologically effective dose of 100 Gy10. Post-SMART therapy included surgery (22.6%), irreversible electroporation (9.7%), and/or chemotherapy (51.6%). Death was attributed to locoregional progression, DMs, cancer-related cachexia/malnutrition, surgery/irreversible electroporation complications, other reasons not due to cancer progression, or unknown causes in 7.1%, 45.2%, 11.9%, 9.5%, 11.9%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively. Intra-abdominal metastases of the liver and peritoneum were responsible for 84.2% of deaths from DMs.ConclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first contemporary evaluation of causes of death in patients with PDAC receiving dose-escalated radiation therapy. We demonstrated that the predominant cause of PDAC-related death was from liver and peritoneal metastases; therefore novel treatment strategies are indicated to address occult micrometastatic disease at these sites.

Project description:PURPOSE:To develop and validate a technique for radiation therapy gating using slow (?1 frame per second) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a motion model. Proposed uses of the technique include radiation therapy gating using T2-weighted images and conducting additional imaging studies during gated treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS:The technique uses a physiologically guided breathing motion model to interpolate deformed target position between 2-dimensional (2D) MRI images acquired every 1 to 3 seconds. The model is parameterized by a 1-dimensional respiratory bellows surrogate and is continuously updated with the most recently acquired 2D images. A phantom and 8 volunteers were imaged with a 0.35T MRI-guided radiation therapy system. A balanced steady-state free precession sequence with a 2D frame rate of 3 frames per second was used to evaluate the technique. The accuracy and beam-on positive predictive value (PPV) of the model-based gating decisions were evaluated using the gating decisions derived from imaging as a ground truth. A T2-weighted gating offline proof-of-concept study using a half-Fourier, single-shot, turbo-spin echo sequence is reported. RESULTS:Model-interpolated gating accuracy, beam-on PPV, and median absolute distances between model and image-tracked target centroids were, on average, 98.3%, 98.4%, and 0.33 mm, respectively, in the balanced steady-state free precession phantom studies and 93.7%, 92.1%, and 0.86 mm, respectively, in the volunteer studies. T2 model-interpolated gating in 6 volunteers yielded an average accuracy and PPV of 94.3% and 92.5%, respectively, and the mean absolute median distance between modeled and imaged target centroids was 0.86 mm. CONCLUSIONS:This work demonstrates the concept of model-interpolated gating for MRI-guided radiation therapy. The technique was found to be potentially sufficiently accurate for clinical use. Further development is needed to accommodate out-of-plane motion and the use of an internal MR-based respiratory surrogate.

Project description:PurposePreoperative radiation therapy (RT) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma reduces positive surgical margin rates, and when delivered to an ablative dose range it may improve local control and overall survival for patients with unresectable disease. Use of stereotactic body RT to achieve a higher biologically effective dose has been limited by toxicity to adjacent radiosensitive structures, but this can be mitigated by stereotactic magnetic resonance image guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART).Methods and materialsWe describe our single-institution experience of high biologically effective dose SMART before resection of localized pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Toxicity was evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V 5.0). Tumor response was evaluated according to the College of American Pathologists tumor regression grading criteria.ResultsWe analyzed 26 patients with borderline resectable (80.8%), locally advanced (11.5%), and resectable (7.7%) tumors who received ablative dose SMART (A-SMART) followed by surgical resection. Median age at diagnosis was 68 years (range, 34-86). Most patients received chemotherapy (80.8%) before RT. All patients received A-SMART to a median dose of 50 (range, 40-50) Gy in 5 fractions. Toxicity data were collected prospectively and there were no acute grade 2+ toxicities associated with RT. The median time to resection was 50 days (range, 37-115), and the procedure types included Whipple (69%), distal (23%), or total pancreatectomy (8%). The R0 resection rate was 96% and no perioperative deaths occurred within 90 days. Pathologic response was observed in 88% of cases. The time from RT to surgery was associated with tumor regression grade (P = .0003). The median follow-up after RT was 16.5 months (range, 3.9-26.2). The derived median progression-free survival from RT was 13.2 months.ConclusionsThe initial surgical and pathologic outcomes after A-SMART are encouraging. Preoperative A-SMART was associated with low toxicity rates and no surgical or RT-associated mortality. The surgical morbidity was comparable to historic rates after upfront resection. These data also suggest that the time from stereotactic body RT to surgical resection is associated with pathologic response.

Project description:To investigate the undesired irradiations outside of the treatment field by electron streams in air (air-electron-stream) during magnetic-resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT). A custom-made support phantom adjusting angles between the beam central axis (CAX) and the phantom surface (termed phantom-angles), were used. Using the ViewRay system, a rectangular parallelepiped phantom placed on the support phantom, was irradiated with field sizes of 6.3 cm × 6.3 cm (FS6.3) and 12.6 cm × 12.6 cm (FS12.6) at gantry angles of 0°, 30°, and 330°, and phantom-angles of 10°, 20°, and 30°. For each beam delivery, the isocenter was located at the center of mass of the phantom and 3 Gy was delivered to the isocenter (prescription dose = 3 Gy). The doses given by the air-electron-streams were measured using the EBT3 films on the panels placed orthogonal to the direction of the magnetic field at distances of 10 and 17 cm from CAX. Two dose distributions per irradiation were measured on the panel facing the phantom surface of the incident beam (front panel) and on the panel facing the phantom surface of the beam exit (end panel). We investigated the doses by the air-electron-streams by calculating the average doses inside the circles drawn around a point of the maximum dose with radii of x cm (DRx) from the dose distributions on the panels (x = 1-5 cm). The largest value of DRx was DR1 (1.64 Gy, 55% of the prescription dose) at 10 cm distance from CAX, with FS12.6, at 30° phantom-angle and 330° gantry angle. The average difference of the DR1 at the end panels (FS12.6) between the calculations and measurements was 1.36 Gy. The average global gamma passing rate with 3%/3 mm on the dose distributions at the end panels (FS12.6) was 40.3%. The calculated dose distributions on both panels were not coincident with the measured dose distributions. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between the projected areas and the DRx values were always higher than 0.75 (all with p < 0.001). The doses by the air-electron-streams increased with the projected areas of the cross-sections of the treatment beams on the panels.

Project description:Purpose:Magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (MRgOART) requires accurate and efficient segmentation. However, the performance of current autosegmentation tools is generally poor for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) owing to day-to-day variations in image intensity and patient anatomy. In this study, we propose a patient-specific autosegmentation strategy using multiple-input deformable image registration (DIR; PASSMID) to improve segmentation accuracy and efficiency for MRgOART. Methods and materials:Longitudinal MRI scans acquired on a 1.5T MRI-Linac for 10 patients with abdominal cancer were used. The proposed PASSMID includes 2 steps: applying a patient-specific image processing pipeline to longitudinal MRI scans, and populating all contours from previous sessions/fractions to a new fractional MRI using multiple DIRs and combining the resulted contours using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) to obtain the final consensus segmentation. Five contour propagation strategies were compared: planning computed tomography to fractional MRI scans through rigid body registration (RDR), pretreatment MRI to fractional MRI scans through RDR and DIR, and the proposed multi-input DIR/STAPLE without preprocessing, and the PASSMID. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) with ground truth contours were calculated slice by slice to quantify the contour accuracy. A quantitative index, defined as the ratio of acceptable slices, was introduced using a criterion of DSC > 0.8 and MDA < 2 mm. Results:The proposed PASSMID performed well with an average 2-dimensional DSC/MDA of 0.94/1.78 mm, 0.93/1.04 mm, 0.93/1.06 mm, 0.93/1.14 mm, 0.92/0.83 mm, 0.84/1.53 mm, 0.86/2.39 mm, 0.81/2.49 mm, 0.72/5.48 mm, and 0.70/5.03 mm for the liver, left kidney, right kidney, spleen, aorta, pancreas, stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and colon, respectively. Starting from the third fractions, the contour accuracy was significantly improved with PASSMID compared with the single-DIR strategy (P < .05). The mean ratio of acceptable slices were 13.9%, 17.5%, 60.8%, 70.6%, and 71.8% for the 5 strategies, respectively. Conclusions:The proposed PASSMID solution, by combining image processing, multi-input DIRs, and STAPLE, can significantly improve the accuracy of autosegmentation for intrapatient MRI scans, reducing the time required for further contour editing, thereby facilitating the routine practice of MRgOART.

Project description:PurposeMagnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (MRgOART) requires accurate and efficient segmentation. However, the performance of current autosegmentation tools is generally poor for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) owing to day-to-day variations in image intensity and patient anatomy. In this study, we propose a patient-specific autosegmentation strategy using multiple-input deformable image registration (DIR; PASSMID) to improve segmentation accuracy and efficiency for MRgOART.Methods and materialsLongitudinal MRI scans acquired on a 1.5T MRI-Linac for 10 patients with abdominal cancer were used. The proposed PASSMID includes 2 steps: applying a patient-specific image processing pipeline to longitudinal MRI scans, and populating all contours from previous sessions/fractions to a new fractional MRI using multiple DIRs and combining the resulted contours using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) to obtain the final consensus segmentation. Five contour propagation strategies were compared: planning computed tomography to fractional MRI scans through rigid body registration (RDR), pretreatment MRI to fractional MRI scans through RDR and DIR, and the proposed multi-input DIR/STAPLE without preprocessing, and the PASSMID. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) with ground truth contours were calculated slice by slice to quantify the contour accuracy. A quantitative index, defined as the ratio of acceptable slices, was introduced using a criterion of DSC > 0.8 and MDA < 2 mm.ResultsThe proposed PASSMID performed well with an average 2-dimensional DSC/MDA of 0.94/1.78 mm, 0.93/1.04 mm, 0.93/1.06 mm, 0.93/1.14 mm, 0.92/0.83 mm, 0.84/1.53 mm, 0.86/2.39 mm, 0.81/2.49 mm, 0.72/5.48 mm, and 0.70/5.03 mm for the liver, left kidney, right kidney, spleen, aorta, pancreas, stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and colon, respectively. Starting from the third fractions, the contour accuracy was significantly improved with PASSMID compared with the single-DIR strategy (P < .05). The mean ratio of acceptable slices were 13.9%, 17.5%, 60.8%, 70.6%, and 71.8% for the 5 strategies, respectively.ConclusionsThe proposed PASSMID solution, by combining image processing, multi-input DIRs, and STAPLE, can significantly improve the accuracy of autosegmentation for intrapatient MRI scans, reducing the time required for further contour editing, thereby facilitating the routine practice of MRgOART.

Project description:IntroductionPancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) has some of the worst treatment outcomes for any solid tumor. PAC creates substantial difficulty for effective treatment with traditional RT delivery strategies primarily secondary to its location and limited visualization using CT. Several of these challenges are uniquely addressed with MR-guided RT. We sought to summarize and place into context the currently available literature on MR-guided RT specifically for PAC.MethodsA literature search was conducted to identify manuscript publications since September 2014 that specifically used MR-guided RT for the treatment of PAC. Clinical outcomes of these series are summarized, discussed, and placed into the context of the existing pancreatic literature. Multiple international experts were involved to optimally contextualize these publications.ResultsOver 300 manuscripts were reviewed. A total of 6 clinical outcomes publications were identified that have treated patients with PAC using MR guidance. Successes, challenges, and future directions for this technology are evident in these publications. MR-guided RT holds theoretical promise for the treatment of patients with PAC. As with any new technology, immediate or dramatic clinical improvements associated with its use will take time and experience. There remain no prospective trials, currently publications are limited to small retrospective experiences. The current level of evidence for MR guidance in PAC is low and requires significant expansion. Future directions and ongoing studies that are currently open and accruing are identified and reviewed.ConclusionsThe potential promise of MR-guided RT for PAC is highlighted, the challenges associated with this novel therapeutic intervention are also reviewed. Outcomes are very early, and will require continued and long term follow up. MR-guided RT should not be viewed in the same fashion as a novel chemotherapeutic agent for which dosing, administration, and toxicity has been established in earlier phase studies. Instead, it should be viewed as a novel procedural intervention which must be robustly tested, refined and practiced before definitive conclusions on the potential benefits or detriments can be determined. The future of MR-guided RT for PAC is highly promising and the potential implications on PAC are substantial.