Dataset Information

Quality and concordance of genotyping array data of 12,064 samples from 5840 cancer patients.

ABSTRACT: Genotyping arrays characterize genome-wide SNPs for a study cohort and were the primary technology behind genome wide association studies over the last decade. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is one of the largest cancer consortium studies, and it collected genotyping data for all of its participants. Using TCGA SNP data genotyped using the Affymetrix 6.0 SNP array from 12,064 samples, we conducted a comprehensive comparisons across DNA sources (tumor tissue, normal tissue, and blood) and sample storage protocols (formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) vs. freshly frozen (FF)), examining genotypes, transition/transversion ratios, and mutation catalogues. During the analysis, we made important observations in relevance to the data quality issues. SNP concordance was excellent between blood and normal tissues, and slightly lower between blood and tumor tissue due to potential somatic mutations in the tumors. The observed poor SNP concordance between FFPE and FF samples suggested a batch effect. The transition/transversion ratio, a metric commonly used for quality control purpose in exome sequencing projects, appeared less applicable for genotyping array data due to the whole-genome coverage built into the array design. Moreover, there were substantially more loss of heterozygosity events than gain of heterozygosity when comparing tumors relative to normal tissues and blood. This might be a consequence of extensive copy number deletions in tumors. In summary, our thorough evaluation calls for more adequate quality control practices and provides guidelines for improved application of TCGA genotyping data.

SUBMITTER: Guo M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6546549 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Quality and concordance of genotyping array data of 12,064 samples from 5840 cancer patients.

Guo Mingsheng M Yue Wei W Samuels David C DC Yu Hui H He Jing J Zhao Ying-Yong YY Guo Yan Y

Genomics 20180611 4

Genotyping arrays characterize genome-wide SNPs for a study cohort and were the primary technology behind genome wide association studies over the last decade. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is one of the largest cancer consortium studies, and it collected genotyping data for all of its participants. Using TCGA SNP data genotyped using the Affymetrix 6.0 SNP array from 12,064 samples, we conducted a comprehensive comparisons across DNA sources (tumor tissue, normal tissue, and blood) and sample ...[more]

PMID: 29902512

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using array-based genotyping technology are widely used to identify genetic loci associated with complex diseases or other phenotypes. The costs of GWAS projects based on individual genotyping are still comparatively high and increase with the size of study populations. Genotyping using pooled DNA samples, as also being referred as to allelotyping approach, offers an alternative at affordable costs. In the present study, data from 100 DNA samples individually genotyped with the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 were used to estimate the error of the pooling approach by comparing the results with those obtained using the same array type but DNA pools each composed of 50 of the same samples. Newly developed and established methods for signal intensity correction were applied. Furthermore, the relative allele intensity signals (RAS) obtained by allelotyping were compared to the corresponding values derived from individual genotyping. Similarly, differences in RAS values between pools were determined and compared. RESULTS: Regardless of the intensity correction method applied, the pooling-specific error of the pool intensity values was larger for single pools than for the comparison of the intensity values of two pools, which reflects the scenario of a case-control study. Using 50 pooled samples and analyzing 10,000 SNPs with a minor allele frequency of >1% and applying the best correction method for the corresponding type of comparison, the 90% quantile (median) of the pooling-specific absolute error of the RAS values for single sub-pools and the SNP-specific difference in allele frequency comparing two pools was 0.064 (0.026) and 0.056 (0.021), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Correction of the RAS values reduced the error of the RAS values when analyzing single pool intensities. We developed a new correction method with high accuracy but low computational costs. Correction of RAS, however, only marginally reduced the error of true differences between two sample groups and those obtained by allelotyping. Exclusion of SNPs with a minor allele frequency of ? 1% notably reduced the pooling-specific error. Our findings allow for improving the estimation of the pooling-specific error and may help in designing allelotyping studies using the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0.

Project description:Understanding early predictors of sow fertility has the potential to improve genomic predictions. A custom SNP array (SowPro90 produced by Affymetrix) was developed to include genetic variants overlapping quantitative trait loci for age at puberty, one of the earliest indicators of sow fertility, as well as variants related to innate and adaptive immunity. The polymorphisms included in the custom genotyping array were identified using multiple genomic approaches including deep genomic and transcriptomic sequencing and genome-wide associations. Animals from research and commercial populations (n = 2,586) were genotyped for 103,476 SNPs included in SowPro90. To assess the quality of data generated, genotype concordance was evaluated between the SowPro90 and Porcine SNP60 BeadArray using a subset of common SNP (n = 44,708) and animals (n = 277). The mean genotype concordance rate per SNP was 98.4%. Differences in distribution of data quality were observed between the platforms indicating the need for platform specific thresholds for quality parameters. The optimal thresholds for SowPro90 (≥97% SNP and ≥93% sample call rate) were obtained by analyzing the data quality distribution and genotype concordance per SNP across platforms. At ≥97% SNP call rate, there were 42,151 SNPs (94.3%) retained with a mean genotype concordance of 98.6% across platforms. Similarly, ≥94% SNPs and ≥85% sample call rates were established as thresholds for Porcine SNP60 BeadArray. At ≥94% SNPs call rate, there were 41,043 SNPs (91.8%) retained with a mean genotype concordance of 98.6% across platforms. Final evaluation of SowPro90 array content (n = 103,476) at ≥97% SNPs and ≥93% sample call rates allowed retention of 89,040 SNPs (86%) for downstream analysis. The findings and strategy for quality control could be helpful in identifying consistent, high-quality genotypes for genomic evaluations, especially when integrating genotype data from different platforms.

Dataset Information

Quality and concordance of genotyping array data of 12,064 samples from 5840 cancer patients.

Publications

Quality and concordance of genotyping array data of 12,064 samples from 5840 cancer patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets