Dataset Information

Combination of Changes in Estimated GFR and Albuminuria and the Risk of Major Clinical Outcomes.

ABSTRACT:

Background and objectives

Whether combining changes in eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) is more strongly associated with outcomes compared with either change alone is unknown.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

We analyzed 8766 patients with type 2 diabetes in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation Observational (ADVANCE-ON) study. Changes in eGFR and UACR (baseline to 2 years) were defined as ?40% decrease, minor change, and ?40% increase. The primary outcome was the composite of major macrovascular (nonfatal or fatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal or fatal stroke, or cardiovascular death), major kidney events (requirement for kidney replacement therapy or kidney death), and all-cause mortality.

Results

Over a median of 7.7 years of follow-up, 2191 primary outcomes were recorded. Strong linear associations between eGFR and UACR changes and subsequent risk of the outcome were observed. For eGFR, the hazard ratios were 1.58 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.27 to 1.95) for a decrease ?40% and 0.82 for an increase ?40% (95% CI, 0.64 to 1.04) compared with minor change. For UACR, the hazard ratios were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.07) for a decrease ?40% and 1.32 (95% CI, 1.19 to 1.46) for ?40% increase compared with minor change. Compared with dual minor changes, both an eGFR decrease ?40% and a UACR increase ?40% had 2.31 (95% CI, 1.67 to 3.18) times the risk of the outcome, with evidence of interaction between the two markers.

Conclusions

Clinically meaningful decreases in eGFR and increases in UACR over 2 years, independently and in combination, were significantly associated with higher risk of major clinical outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Ohkuma T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6556720 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Combination of Changes in Estimated GFR and Albuminuria and the Risk of Major Clinical Outcomes.

Ohkuma Toshiaki T Jun Min M Chalmers John J Cooper Mark E ME Hamet Pavel P Harrap Stephen S Zoungas Sophia S Perkovic Vlado V Woodward Mark M

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN 20190603 6

<h4>Background and objectives</h4>Whether combining changes in eGFR and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) is more strongly associated with outcomes compared with either change alone is unknown.<h4>Design, setting, participants, & measurements</h4>We analyzed 8766 patients with type 2 diabetes in the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation Observational (ADVANCE-ON) study. Changes in eGFR and UACR (baseline to 2 years) were def ...[more]

PMID: 31160317

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rationale & objectiveDetermining whether a change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or albuminuria is clinically significant requires knowledge of short-term within-person variability of the measurements, which few studies have addressed in the setting of chronic kidney disease.Study designCross-sectional study with multiple collections over less than 4 weeks.Setting & participantsClinically stable outpatients with chronic kidney disease (N=50; mean age, 56.8 years; median eGFR, 40mL/min/1.73m2; median urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), 173mg/g).ExposureRepeat measurements from serially collected samples across 3 study visits.OutcomesMeasurements of urine albumin concentration (UAC), UACR, and plasma creatinine, cystatin C, β2-microglobulin (B2M), and beta trace protein (BTP).Analytical approachWe calculated within-person coefficients of variation (CVw) values and corresponding reference change positive and negative (RCVpos and RCVneg) values using log-transformed measurements.ResultsMedian CVw (RCVpos; RCVneg) values of filtration markers were 5.4% (+16%; -14%) for serum creatinine, 4.1% (+12%; -11%) for cystatin C, 7.4% (+23%; -18%) for BTP, and 5.6% (+17%; -14%) for B2M. Results for albuminuria were 33.2% (+145%; -59%) for first-morning UAC, 50.6% (+276%; -73%) for random spot UAC, 32.5% (+141%; -58%) for first-morning UACR, and 29.7% (124%; -55%) for random spot UACR. CVw values for filtration markers were comparable across the range of baseline eGFRs. CVw values for UAC and UACR were comparable across the range of baseline albuminuria values.LimitationsSmall sample size limits the ability to detect differences in variability across markers. Participants were recruited and followed up in a clinical and not research setting, so some preanalytical factors could not be controlled.ConclusionseGFR markers appear to have relatively low short-term within-person variability, whereas variability in albuminuria appears to be high, making it difficult to distinguish random variability from meaningful biologic changes.

Project description:Rationale & objectiveEvidence is limited on how estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) relate to dementia at different ages. We evaluated eGFR and UACR in midlife and older age as risk factors for dementia. Additionally, we assessed whether the association between eGFR and dementia is altered when cystatin C and β2-microglobulin (B2M) levels are used for GFR estimation.Study designProspective cohort study.Setting & participantsTwo baselines from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study were used: visit 4 (1996-1998), including 9,967 participants 54 to 74 years old, and visit 5 (2011-2013), including 4,626 participants 70 to 90 years old. Participants were followed up until 2017.PredictorsLog(UACR); eGFR based on creatinine, cystatin C, creatinine and cystatin C, or B2M levels (denoted as eGFRcr, eGFRcys, eGFRcr-cys, and eGFRB2M).OutcomeIncident dementia.Analytical approachMultivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models fit separately for each of the 5 predictors and based on a change in the predictor equivalent to the interquartile range for that predictor at visit 4 (IQRV4). eGFR models were adjusted for log(UACR) and log(UACR) models were adjusted for eGFRcys.ResultsWe observed 1,821 dementia cases after visit 4 and 438 cases after visit 5. Dementia risk increased with higher albuminuria levels (HRs per IQRV4 [equivalent to 4.2-fold greater log albuminuria] of 1.15 [95% CI, 1.09-1.21] after visit 4 and 1.27 [95% CI, 1.13-1.42] after visit 5). An association with lower eGFR was seen for only eGFRcys (HRs per IQRV4 [equivalent to 24.3mL/min/1.73m2 lesser eGFRcys] of 1.12 [95% CI, 1.04-1.21] after visit 4 and 1.30 [95% CI, 1.12-1.52] after visit 5) and eGFRB2M (HRs per IQRV4 [equivalent to 18.3mL/min/1.73m2 lesser eGFRB2M] of 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07-1.23] after visit 4 and 1.34 [95% CI, 1.17-1.55] after visit 5). Differences between these associations in midlife and older age were not statistically significant.LimitationsChanges in potentially time-varying covariates were not measured. Dementia was not subclassified by cause.ConclusionsAlbuminuria was consistently associated with dementia incidence. Lower eGFR based on cystatin C or B2M, but not creatinine, levels was also associated with dementia. Risk associations were similar when kidney measures were assessed at midlife and older age.

Project description:Rationale & objectiveThere are few data on the absolute effects of sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, despite their importance in treatment decision making. We investigated absolute treatment effects according to baseline kidney disease status.Study designMeta-analysis.Study populationsAdults with type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or heart failure.Selection criteria for studiesRandomized controlled trials of SGLT2 inhibitors (10 trials to November 20, 2020) for clinical outcomes of kidney disease progression, heart failure events, and major cardiovascular events.Data extractionPublications of 10 trials to November 20, 2020.Analytical approachThe incidence rate difference (IRD) between SGLT2 inhibitor and placebo was compared across estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) subgroups.ResultsSubgroup analyses included data from seven trials (61,821 participants with diabetes or chronic kidney disease). SGLT2 inhibitor treatment, in eGFR subgroups of <45, 45 to <60, and ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, reduced 16.0, 9.5, and 1.9 heart failure events per 1,000 patient-year, respectively (P < 0.001 for heterogeneity). In urine UACR subgroups of >300, 30 to 300, and <30 mg/g, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced 17.3, 1.4, and 2.2 kidney disease events per 1,000 patient-year, respectively (P < 0.001 for heterogeneity), and 14.8, 8.7, and 2.1 heart failure events per 1,000 patient-year, respectively (P = 0.006 for heterogeneity). The pooled IRDs for major cardiovascular events were also greater in lower eGFR or overt albuminuria subgroups. In secondary analyses, risk differences calculated using pooled baseline and relative risks were comparable to the pooled IRDs, while the relative risk reductions for kidney and heart failure outcomes were consistent across the subgroups. For treatment-related harms, IRDs were similar between eGFR subgroups.LimitationsStudy-level data rather than individual patient data were used.ConclusionsSGLT2 inhibitor treatment resulted in greater reductions of cardiovascular events in patients with lower eGFR and higher albuminuria and had substantially greater absolute benefits of renoprotection in patients with overt albuminuria than in their counterparts.

Project description:BackgroundDespite the interrelationships between obesity, eGFR and albuminuria, few large studies examine how obesity modifies the association between these markers of kidney function and adverse clinical outcomes.MethodsWe examined the joint associations between obesity, eGFR and albuminuria on four clinical outcomes (death, end-stage renal disease [ESRD], myocardial infarction [MI], and placement in a long-term care facility) using a population-based cohort with procedures from Alberta. Obesity was defined by body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 as defined by a fee modifier applied to an eligible procedure.ResultsWe studied 1,293,362 participants, of whom 171,650 (13.3%) had documented obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 based on claims data) and 1,121,712 (86.7%) did not. The association between eGFR and death was J-shaped for participants with and without documented obesity. After full adjustment, obesity tended to be associated with slightly lower odds of mortality (OR range 0.71-1.02; p for interaction between obesity and eGFR 0.008). For participants with and without obesity, the adjusted odds of ESRD were lowest for participants with eGFR > 90 mL/min*1.73m2 and increased with lower eGFR, with no evidence of an interaction with obesity (p = 0.37). Although albuminuria and obesity were both associated with higher odds of ESRD, the excess risk associated with obesity was substantially attenuated at higher levels of albuminuria (p for interaction 0.0006). The excess risk of MI associated with obesity was observed at eGFR > 60 mL/min*1.73m2 but not at lower eGFR (p for interaction < 0.0001). Participants with obesity had a higher adjusted likelihood of placement in long-term care than those without, and the likelihood of such placement was higher at lower eGFR for those with and without obesity (p for interaction = 0.57).ConclusionsWe found significant interactions between obesity and eGFR and/or albuminuria on the likelihood of adverse outcomes including death and ESRD. Since obesity is common, risk prediction tools for people with CKD might be improved by adding information on BMI or other proxies for body size in addition to eGFR and albuminuria.

Dataset Information

Combination of Changes in Estimated GFR and Albuminuria and the Risk of Major Clinical Outcomes.

Background and objectives

Design, setting, participants, & measurements

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Combination of Changes in Estimated GFR and Albuminuria and the Risk of Major Clinical Outcomes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets