Dataset Information

Evaluation and comparison of electromyographic activity in bench press with feet on the ground and active hip flexion.

ABSTRACT: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the levels of electromyographic activation in the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, triceps brachii, forearm, rectus abdominis, external oblique, and rectus femoris muscles during a horizontal bench press in two situations: 1) with the feet on the ground; and 2) with active hip flexion and 90° of knee flexion. Twenty young men were familiarized with the procedure and the calculation of one-rep max (1RM). In a second session, electromyographic activity values were recorded in both bench press situations (with the feet on the ground vs active hip flexion and knees at 90°) at 60% 1RM. Performing the bench press with the hips and knees flexed produced significantly greater muscle activation of all elevated muscles (p < 0.01; d > 0.5). The pectoralis major showed the greatest activation, followed by the anterior deltoid and the triceps brachii. In addition, the greater activation of the abdominal muscles occurs due to the need to stabilize the core while performing the bench press with hip and knee flexion as well as the lumbar spine due to traction of the hip flexors.

SUBMITTER: Muyor JM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6568408 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation and comparison of electromyographic activity in bench press with feet on the ground and active hip flexion.

Muyor José M JM Rodríguez-Ridao David D Martín-Fuentes Isabel I Antequera-Vique José A JA

PloS one 20190614 6

The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the levels of electromyographic activation in the pectoralis major, anterior deltoid, triceps brachii, forearm, rectus abdominis, external oblique, and rectus femoris muscles during a horizontal bench press in two situations: 1) with the feet on the ground; and 2) with active hip flexion and 90° of knee flexion. Twenty young men were familiarized with the procedure and the calculation of one-rep max (1RM). In a second session, electromyographic act ...[more]

PMID: 31199829

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose To evaluate the effect of hip flexion and rotation on excursion of the gluteus medius (Gmed) and minimus (Gmin) myotendinous unit. Methods Seven hips from 4 cadaveric specimens (males, 68.5 ± 18.3 years old) were dissected to isolate the Gmed posterior and lateral insertions and the Gmin proximal and distal insertions. Sutures were placed from tendon insertions through origins created in the iliac fossa to simulate the myotendinous unit. A load of 10N was applied. Myotendinous excursion was measured at 10° hip extension and 0°, 45°, and 90° of hip flexion in neutral rotation, and from maximum internal and external rotation in 90° flexion. The amount of abduction and rotation was also measured at each flexion position with 20N applied to each tendon. Repeated-measures analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc was used for statistics. Results Gmed-lateral excursion ranged from 2.4 ± 0.4 mm in 10° of hip extension to 23.0 ± 1.5 mm in 90° of flexion (P < .001), and Gmed-posterior excursion ranged from 0.92 ± 0.5 mm in 10° of extension to 38.1 ± 1.1 mm in 90° of flexion (P < .001). Gmin excursion shortened with hip flexion from 4.2 ± 0.3 mm in 10° of extension to −0.2 ± 1.5 mm in 90° of flexion (Gmin-prox: P = .525, Gmin-distal: P < .001). At 90° flexion from maximum internal to maximum external rotation, Gmin-distal and proximal demonstrated a 92.6% and 51.3% increase in excursion, respectively (P < .001). Gmed-lateral and Gmed-posterior demonstrated 49.4% and 23.1% increase in excursion with external rotation, respectively (P < .001). Conclusions The Gmed myotendinous unit undergoes significant excursion with hip flexion, whereas both Gmed and Gmin had significant excursion with femoral external rotation in 90° flexion. Clinical Relevance It is important to understand whether active or passive hip flexion or rotation in the early postoperative period causes excessive strain to an abductor tendon repair. We found that consideration should be given to limit flexion after Gmed repair and external rotation after Gmed or Gmin repairs.

Project description:BackgroundThe bench press exercise (BP) plays an important role in recreational and professional training, in which muscle activity is an important multifactorial phenomenon. The objective of this paper is to systematically review electromyography (EMG) studies performed on the barbell BP exercise to answer the following research questions: Which muscles show the greatest activity during the flat BP? Which changes in muscle activity are related to specific conditions under which the BP movement is performed?StrategyPubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library were searched through June 10, 2016. A combination of the following search terms was used: bench press, chest press, board press, test, measure, assessment, dynamometer, kinematics and biomechanics. Only original, full-text articles were considered.ResultsThe search process resulted in 14 relevant studies that were included in the discussion. The triceps brachii (TB) and pectoralis major (PM) muscles were found to have similar activity during the BP, which was significantly higher than the activity of the anterior deltoid. During the BP movement, muscle activity changes with exercise intensity, velocity of movement, fatigue, mental focus, movement phase and stability conditions, such as bar vibration or unstable surfaces. Under these circumstances, TB is the most common object of activity change.ConclusionsPM and TB EMG activity is more dominant and shows greater EMG amplitude than anterior deltoid during the BP. There are six factors that can influence muscle activity during the BP; however, the most important factor is exercise intensity, which interacts with all other factors. The research on muscle activity in the BP has several unresolved areas, such as clearly and strongly defined guidelines to perform EMG measurements (e.g., how to elaborate with surface EMG limits) or guidelines for the use of exact muscle models.

Project description:ObjectiveThe intensity of barbell bench press exercise is generally prescribed as the load to be lifted for a specific number of repetitions; however, other factors (e.g., execution velocity) can affect bench press exercise intensity. Moreover, no study assessed whether load distribution (i.e., the distance between the disc stacks on the two sides of the barbell) affects exercise intensity. The present study aims to assess how different combinations of load, velocity, and barbell load distribution affect the number of repetitions to failure (REPfailure), and rating of perceived exertion (RPEfatigue) and number of repetitions (REPfatigue) at fatigue onset.MethodsTen males (age 23.3±1.8 years) performed bench press exercises to exhaustion using random combinations of three loads (50%, 65%, and 80% of 1 repetition maximum), three execution velocities (50%, 70%, and 90% of maximal concentric velocity), and two load distributions (narrow and wide). Three separate three-way repeated-measures ANOVAs were performed to assess the effect of load, velocity, and load distribution on REPfailure, RPEfatigue, and REPfatigue expressed as a percentage of REPfailure.ResultsREPfailure was affected by load (p<0.001), velocity (p<0.001), and distribution (p = 0.005). The interactions between load and velocity (p<0.001) and load and distribution (p = 0.004) showed a significant effect on REPfailure, whereas the interaction between velocity and distribution was not significant (p = 0.360). Overall, more REPfailure were performed using lower loads, higher velocities, and a wider distribution. RPEfatigue and REPfatigue were affected by load (p<0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively) and velocity (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively), and not by distribution (p = 0.510 and p = 0.571, respectively) or the two-way interaction effects. Overall, using higher loads yielded higher RPEfatigue but lower REPfatigue, while RPEfatigue and REPfatigue were higher when slower velocities were used.ConclusionThe current investigation shows that not only load but also velocity and barbell load distribution may influence bench press training volume and perceived exertion.

Dataset Information

Evaluation and comparison of electromyographic activity in bench press with feet on the ground and active hip flexion.

Publications

Evaluation and comparison of electromyographic activity in bench press with feet on the ground and active hip flexion.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets