Dataset Information

Can endoscopists differentiate cytomegalovirus esophagitis from herpes simplex virus esophagitis based on gross endoscopic findings?

ABSTRACT: Differential diagnosis between herpes simplex virus (HSV) esophagitis and cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis is challenging because there are many similarities and overlaps between their endoscopic features. The aims of this study were to investigate the implications of the endoscopic findings for the diagnosis of HSV and CMV esophagitis, and to develop a predictive model for differentiating CMV esophagitis from HSV esophagitis.Patients who underwent endoscopic examination and had pathologically-confirmed HSV or CMV esophagitis were eligible. Clinical characteristics and endoscopic features were retrospectively reviewed and categorized. A predictive model was developed based on parameters identified by logistic regression analysis.During the 8-year study period, HSV and CMV esophagitis were diagnosed in 85 and 63 patients, respectively. The endoscopic features of esophagitis were categorized and scored as follows: category 1 (-3 points): discrete ulcers or ulcers with vesicles, bullae, or pseudomembranes, category 2 (-2 points): coalescent or geographic ulcers, category 3 (1 points): ulcers with an uneven base, friability, or with a circumferential distribution, category 4 (2 points): punched-out, serpiginous, or healing ulcers with yellowish exudates. And previous history of transplantation (2 point) was included in the model as a discriminating clinical feature. The optimal cutoff point of the prediction model was 0 (area under receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.967), with positive scores favoring CMV esophagitis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 96.8%, 89.4%, 92.6%, 87.3%, and 97.5%, respectively.The predictive model based on endoscopic and clinical findings appears to be accurate and useful in differentiating CMV esophagitis from HSV esophagitis.

SUBMITTER: Jung KH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6571398 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Can endoscopists differentiate cytomegalovirus esophagitis from herpes simplex virus esophagitis based on gross endoscopic findings?

Jung Kyung Hwa KH Choi Jonggi J Gong Eun Jeong EJ Lee Jeong Hoon JH Choi Kee Don KD Song Ho June HJ Lee Gin Hyug GH Jung Hwoon-Yong HY Chong Yong Pil YP Lee Sang-Oh SO Choi Sang-Ho SH Kim Yang Soo YS Woo Jun Hee JH Kim Do Hoon DH Kim Sung-Han SH

Medicine 20190601 23

Differential diagnosis between herpes simplex virus (HSV) esophagitis and cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis is challenging because there are many similarities and overlaps between their endoscopic features. The aims of this study were to investigate the implications of the endoscopic findings for the diagnosis of HSV and CMV esophagitis, and to develop a predictive model for differentiating CMV esophagitis from HSV esophagitis.Patients who underwent endoscopic examination and had pathologically- ...[more]

PMID: 31169688

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundHerpesviridae reactivation among non-immunocompromised critically ill patients is associated with impaired prognosis, especially during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, little is known about herpes simplex virus (HSV) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation occurring in patients with severe ARDS under veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We tried to determine the frequency of Herpesviridae reactivation and its impact on patients' prognosis during ECMO for severe ARDS.ResultsDuring a 5-year period, 123 non-immunocompromised patients with a severe ARDS requiring a veno-venous ECMO were included. Sixty-seven patients (54%) experienced HSV and/or CMV reactivation during ECMO course (20 viral co-infection, 40 HSV alone, and 7 CMV alone). HSV reactivation occurred earlier than CMV after the beginning of MV [(6-15) vs. 19 (13-29) days; p < 0.01] and after ECMO implementation [(2-8) vs. 14 (10-20) days; p < 0.01]. In univariate analysis, HSV/CMV reactivation was associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation [(22-52.5) vs. 17.5 (9-28) days; p < 0.01], a longer duration of ECMO [15 (10-22.5) vs. 9 (5-14) days; p < 0.01], and a prolonged ICU [29 (19.5-47.5) vs. 16 (9-30) days; p < 0.01] and hospital stay [44 (29-63.5) vs. 24 (11-43) days; p < 0.01] as compared to non-reactivated patients. However, in multivariate analysis, viral reactivation remained associated with prolonged MV only. When considered separately, both HSV and CMV reactivation were associated with a longer duration of MV as compared to non-reactivation patients [29 (19.5-41) and 28 (20.5-37), respectively, vs. 17.5 (9-28) days; p < 0.05]. Co-reactivation patients had a longer duration of MV [58.5 (38-72.3); p < 0.05] and ICU stay [51.5 (32.5-69) vs. 27.5 (17.75-35.5) and 29 (20-30.5), respectively] as compared to patients with HSV or CMV reactivation alone. In multivariate analysis, HSV reactivation remained independently associated with a longer duration of MV and hospital length of stay.ConclusionsHerpesviridae reactivation is frequent among patients with severe ARDS under veno-venous ECMO and is associated with a longer duration of mechanical ventilation. The direct causative link between HSV and CMV reactivation and respiratory function worsening under ECMO remains to be confirmed.

Dataset Information

Can endoscopists differentiate cytomegalovirus esophagitis from herpes simplex virus esophagitis based on gross endoscopic findings?

Publications

Can endoscopists differentiate cytomegalovirus esophagitis from herpes simplex virus esophagitis based on gross endoscopic findings?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets