Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Drug-coated balloon as a novel therapeutic strategy has been used to treat restenosis in cases of bare metal and drug-eluting stents. However, evidence of its safety and efficacy is scarce in de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the drug-coated balloon and the drug-eluting stent.

Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were searched for studies published up to October 17, 2018. Studies comparing the drug-coated balloon with the drug-eluting stent strategy in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease (reference diameter, <3?mm) were identified. The clinical outcomes were nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiac death, all-cause death, target lesion revascularization, and target-vessel revascularization. Data were analyzed using the statistical software RevMan (version 5.3). Fixed effects models were performed to calculate the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Sensitivity analyses were used to detect potential sources of heterogeneity, while subgroup analyses were implemented to assess the differential effects.

Results

Three randomized controlled trials and 3 nonrandomized controlled studies were identified. Six studies including a total of 1800 patients compared the differences between the drug-coated balloon and the drug-eluting stent strategies in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. The results indicated that the drug-coated balloon strategy was associated with a significant reduction in nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.90, P?=?.02) compared with the drug-eluting stent strategy, while insignificant inter-strategy differences were observed in cardiac death (OR 1.56, 95% CI 0.73-3.33, P?=?.25), all-cause death (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.25-1.23, P?=?.15), target lesion revascularization (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.73-2.1, P?=?.43), and target-vessel revascularization (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59-1.52, P?=?.84).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that the drug-coated balloon strategy is noninferior to the drug-eluting stent strategy, delivering a good outcome in nonfatal myocardial infarction, and can be recommended as an optimal treatment strategy in patients with de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. Larger randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to further confirm the benefits of the drug-coated balloon strategy.

SUBMITTER: Li M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6571399 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in de novo small coronary vessel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Li Min M   Guo Chen C   Lv Yong-Hui YH   Zhang Ming-Bo MB   Wang Zhi-Lu ZL  

Medicine 20190501 21


<h4>Background</h4>Drug-coated balloon as a novel therapeutic strategy has been used to treat restenosis in cases of bare metal and drug-eluting stents. However, evidence of its safety and efficacy is scarce in de novo small coronary artery vessel disease. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of the drug-coated balloon and the drug-eluting stent.<h4>Methods</h4>The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were searched for studies published up to Octo  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10498760 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10721670 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5405921 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10199476 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9270292 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5426232 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10132606 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6198267 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5834842 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8542469 | biostudies-literature