Dataset Information

Analysing public sector institutional capacity for health workforce governance in the South-East Asia region of WHO.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In order to analyse the institutional capacity for health workforce policy development and implementation in countries in the South-East Asia region, the WHO facilitated a cross-sectional analysis of functions performed, structure, personnel, management and information systems of human resources for health (HRH) units in Ministries of Health.

Case presentation

A self-assessment survey on the characteristics and roles of HRH units was administered to relevant Government officials; the responses were validated through face-to-face workshops and by the WHO staff. Findings were tabulated to produce frequency distributions of the variables examined, and qualitative elements categorized according to a framework for capacity building in the health sector. Ten countries out of the 11 in the region responded to the survey. Seven out of 10 reported having an HRH unit, though their scope, roles, capacity and size displayed considerable variability. Some functions (such as planning and health workforce data management) were reportedly carried out in all countries, while others (inter-sectoral coordination, research, labour relations) were only performed in few.

Discussion and conclusions

The strengthening of the HRH governance capacity in countries should follow a logical hierarchy, identifying first and foremost the essential functions that the public sector is expected to perform to optimize HRH governance. The definition of expected roles and functions will in turn allow identifying the upstream system-wide factors and the downstream capacity requirements for the strengthening of the HRH units. The focus should ultimately be on ensuring that all the key strategic functions are performed to quality standards, irrespective of institutional arrangements.

SUBMITTER: Cometto G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6582590 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Analysing public sector institutional capacity for health workforce governance in the South-East Asia region of WHO.

Cometto Giorgio G Nartey Esther E Zapata Tomas T Kanda Mikiko M Md Yunus Y Narayan Kavita K Pritasari Kirana K Irufa Aishath A Lamichhane Ramkrishna R De Silva Dileep D Noree Thinakorn T

Human resources for health 20190618 1

<h4>Background</h4>In order to analyse the institutional capacity for health workforce policy development and implementation in countries in the South-East Asia region, the WHO facilitated a cross-sectional analysis of functions performed, structure, personnel, management and information systems of human resources for health (HRH) units in Ministries of Health.<h4>Case presentation</h4>A self-assessment survey on the characteristics and roles of HRH units was administered to relevant Government ...[more]

PMID: 31215442

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The dynamic intersection of a pluralistic health system, large informal sector, and poor regulatory environment have provided conditions favourable for 'corruption' in the LMICs of south and south-east Asia region. 'Corruption' works to undermine the UHC goals of achieving equity, quality, and responsiveness including financial protection, especially while delivering frontline health care services. This scoping review examines current situation regarding health sector corruption at frontlines of service delivery in this region, related policy perspectives, and alternative strategies currently being tested to address this pervasive phenomenon. METHODS:A scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was conducted, using three search engines i.e., PubMed, SCOPUS and Google Scholar. A total of 15 articles and documents on corruption and 18 on governance were selected for analysis. A PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist was filled-in to complete this report. Data were extracted using a pre-designed template and analysed by 'mixed studies review' method. RESULTS:Common types of corruption like informal payments, bribery and absenteeism identified in the review have largely financial factors as the underlying cause. Poor salary and benefits, poor incentives and motivation, and poor governance have a damaging impact on health outcomes and the quality of health care services. These result in high out-of-pocket expenditure, erosion of trust in the system, and reduced service utilization. Implementing regulations remain constrained not only due to lack of institutional capacity but also political commitment. Lack of good governance encourage frontline health care providers to bend the rules of law and make centrally designed anti-corruption measures largely in-effective. Alternatively, a few bottom-up community-engaged interventions have been tested showing promising results. The challenge is to scale up the successful ones for measurable impact. CONCLUSIONS:Corruption and lack of good governance in these countries undermine the delivery of quality essential health care services in an equitable manner, make it costly for the poor and disadvantaged, and results in poor health outcomes. Traditional measures to combat corruption have largely been ineffective, necessitating the need for innovative thinking if UHC is to be achieved by 2030.

Project description:BackgroundThe South-East Asia region (SEAR) accounts for one-quarter of the world's population, 40% of the global poor and ?30% of the global disease burden, with a disproportionately large share of tuberculosis (35%), injuries (30%), maternal (33%) and <5-year-old mortality (30%). In this article, we describe the disease burden and status of epidemiological research and capacity in the SEAR to understand, analyse and develop capacity in response to the diverse burdens of diseases in the region.MethodsData on morbidity, mortality, risk factors, social determinants, research capacity, health education, workforce and systems in the SEAR were obtained using global data on burden of disease, peer-reviewed journals, World Health Organization (WHO) technical and advisory reports, and where available, validated country reports and key informants from the region.ResultsSEAR countries are afflicted with a triple burden of disease-infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases and injuries. Of the seven WHO regions, SEAR countries account for the highest proportion of global mortality (26%) and due to relatively younger ages at death, the second highest percentage of total years of life lost (30%). The SEAR exceeds the global average annual mortality rate for all three broad cause groupings-communicable, maternal, perinatal and nutritional conditions (334 vs 230 per 100?000); non-communicable diseases (676 vs 573 per 100?000); and injuries (101 vs 78 per 100?000). Poverty, education and other social determinants of health are strongly linked to inequities in health among SEAR countries and within socio-economic subgroups. India, Thailand and Bangladesh produce two-thirds of epidemiology publications in the region. Significant efforts to increase health workforce capacity, research and training have been undertaken in the region, yet considerable heterogeneity in resources and capacity remains.ConclusionsHealth systems, statistics and surveillance programmes must respond to the demographic, economic and epidemiological transitions that define the current disease burden and risk profile of SEAR populations. Inequities in health must be critically analysed, documented and addressed through multi-sectoral approaches. There is a critical need to improve public health intelligence by building epidemiological capacity in the region.

Project description:Despite significant investments in health systems research (HSR) capacity development, there is a dearth of information regarding how to assess HSR capacity. An alliance of schools of public health (SPHs) in East and Central Africa developed a tool for the self-assessment of HSR capacity with the aim of producing institutional capacity development plans.Between June and November 2011, seven SPHs across the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda implemented this co-created tool. The objectives of the institutional assessments were to assess existing capacities for HSR and to develop capacity development plans to address prioritized gaps. A mixed-method approach was employed consisting of document analysis, self-assessment questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and institutional dialogues aimed at capturing individual perceptions of institutional leadership, collective HSR skills, knowledge translation, and faculty incentives to engage in HSR. Implementation strategies for the capacity assessment varied across the SPHs. This paper reports findings from semi-structured interviews with focal persons from each SPH, to reflect on the process used at each SPH to execute the institutional assessments as well as the perceived strengths and weaknesses of the assessment process.The assessment tool was robust enough to be utilized in its entirety across all seven SPHs resulting in a thorough HSR capacity assessment and a capacity development plan for each SPH. Successful implementation of the capacity assessment exercises depended on four factors: (i) support from senior leadership and collaborators, (ii) a common understanding of HSR, (iii) adequate human and financial resources for the exercise, and (iv) availability of data. Methods of extracting information from the results of the assessments, however, were tailored to the unique objectives of each SPH.This institutional HSR capacity assessment tool and the process for its utilization may be valuable for any SPH. The self-assessments, as well as interviews with external stakeholders, provided diverse sources of input and galvanized interest around HSR at multiple levels.

Project description:BackgroundOn January 30, 2020, WHO declared COVID-19 as a Global Public Health Emergency. The first three COVID-19 cases in Bangladesh were confirmed on March 8, 2020. Thus, Bangladesh got substantial time to prepare the people and the health systems to respond to the outbreak However, neither the health ministry nor the government was found to rise to the occasion and provide the necessary stewardship for a coordinated and comprehensive response.ObjectiveThe importance of governance to mount an evidence-based pandemic response cannot be overemphasised. This study presents critical reflections on the Bangladesh government's COVID-19 response through a review of selected papers, with expert deliberations on the review findings to consolidate emerging lessons for future pandemic preparedness.Study designA scoping review approach was taken for this study.MethodsDocuments focusing on COVID-19 governance were selected from a repository of peer-reviewed articles published by researchers using data from Bangladesh (n = 11).ResultsFindings reveal Bangladesh's COVID-19 response to be delayed, slow, and ambiguous, reflecting poorly on its governance. Lack of governance capability in screening for COVID-19, instituting quarantine and lockdown measures in the early weeks, safety and security of frontline healthcare providers, timely and equitable COVID-19 testing, and logistics and procurement were phenomenal. The pandemic unmasked the weaknesses of the health system in this regard and "created new opportunities for corruption." The failure to harmonise coordination among the government's different agencies for the COVID-19 response, along with poor risk communication, which was not culture-sensitive and context-specific. Over time, the government initiated necessary actions to mitigate the pandemic's impact on the lives and livelihoods of the people. Diagnostic and case management services gained strength after some initial faltering; however, the stewardship functions were not seamless.ConclusionsShortage of healthcare workers, incapability of health facilities to cater to COVID-19 suspects and cases, absence of health system resilience, and corruption in procurement and purchases were limited the government's COVID-19 response. These need urgent attention from policymakers to better prepare for the next epidemic/pandemic.

Dataset Information

Analysing public sector institutional capacity for health workforce governance in the South-East Asia region of WHO.

Background

Case presentation

Discussion and conclusions

Publications

Analysing public sector institutional capacity for health workforce governance in the South-East Asia region of WHO.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets