Dataset Information

Semi-parametric analysis of overdispersed count and metric data with varying follow-up times: Asymptotic theory and small sample approximations.

ABSTRACT: Count data are common endpoints in clinical trials, for example magnetic resonance imaging lesion counts in multiple sclerosis. They often exhibit high levels of overdispersion, that is variances are larger than the means. Inference is regularly based on negative binomial regression along with maximum-likelihood estimators. Although this approach can account for heterogeneity it postulates a common overdispersion parameter across groups. Such parametric assumptions are usually difficult to verify, especially in small trials. Therefore, novel procedures that are based on asymptotic results for newly developed rate and variance estimators are proposed in a general framework. Moreover, in case of small samples the procedures are carried out using permutation techniques. Here, the usual assumption of exchangeability under the null hypothesis is not met due to varying follow-up times and unequal overdispersion parameters. This problem is solved by the use of studentized permutations leading to valid inference methods for situations with (i) varying follow-up times, (ii) different overdispersion parameters, and (iii) small sample sizes.

SUBMITTER: Konietschke F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6587510 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Semi-parametric analysis of overdispersed count and metric data with varying follow-up times: Asymptotic theory and small sample approximations.

Konietschke Frank F Friede Tim T Pauly Markus M

Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift 20181205 3

Count data are common endpoints in clinical trials, for example magnetic resonance imaging lesion counts in multiple sclerosis. They often exhibit high levels of overdispersion, that is variances are larger than the means. Inference is regularly based on negative binomial regression along with maximum-likelihood estimators. Although this approach can account for heterogeneity it postulates a common overdispersion parameter across groups. Such parametric assumptions are usually difficult to verif ...[more]

PMID: 30515878

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionCount outcomes in tobacco research are often analyzed with the Poisson distribution. However, they often exhibit features such as overdispersion (variance larger than expected) and zero inflation (extra zeros) that violate model assumptions. Furthermore, longitudinal studies have repeated measures that generate correlated counts. Failure to account for overdispersion, zero inflation, and correlation can yield incorrect statistical inferences. Thus, it is important to familiarize researchers with proper models for such data.Aims and methodsPoisson and Negative Binomial models with correlated random effects with and without zero inflation are presented. The illustrative data comes from a study comparing a mindfulness training app (Craving to Quit [C2Q], n = 60) with a control app (experience sampling-only app, n = 66) on smoking frequency at 1, 3, and 6 months. Predictors include app, time, the app-by-time interaction, and baseline smoking. Each model is evaluated in terms of accounting for zero inflation, overdispersion, and correlation in the data. Emphasis is placed on evaluating model fit, subject-specific interpretation of effects, and choosing an appropriate model.ResultsThe hurdle Poisson model provided the best fit to the data. Smoking abstinence rates were 33%, 32%, and 28% at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively, with variance larger than expected by a factor >7 at each follow-up. Individuals on C2Q were less likely to achieve abstinence across time but likely to smoke fewer cigarettes if smoking.ConclusionsThe models presented are specifically suited for analyzing correlated count outcomes and account for zero inflation and overdispersion. We provide guidance to researchers on the use of these models to better inform nicotine and tobacco research.ImplicationsIn tobacco research, count outcomes are often measured repeatedly on the same subject and thus correlated. Such outcomes often have many zeros and exhibit large variances relative to the mean. Analyzing such data require models specifically suited for correlated counts. The presented models and guidelines could improve the rigor of the analysis of correlated count data and thus increase the impact of studies in nicotine and tobacco research using such outcomes.

Dataset Information

Semi-parametric analysis of overdispersed count and metric data with varying follow-up times: Asymptotic theory and small sample approximations.

Publications

Semi-parametric analysis of overdispersed count and metric data with varying follow-up times: Asymptotic theory and small sample approximations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets