Dataset Information

Validation of Melanoma Immune Profile (MIP), a Prognostic Immune Gene Prediction Score for Stage II-III Melanoma.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:Biomarkers are needed to stratify patients with stage II-III melanoma for clinical trials of adjuvant therapy because, while immunotherapy is protective, it also confers the risk of severe toxicity. We previously defined and validated a 53-immune gene melanoma immune profile (MIP) predictive both of distant metastatic recurrence and of disease-specific survival (DSS). Here, we test MIP on a third independent population. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:A retrospective cohort of 78 patients with stage II-III primary melanoma was analyzed using the NanoString assay to measure expression of 53 target genes, and MIP score was calculated. Statistical analysis correlating MIP with DSS, overall survival, distant metastatic recurrence, and distant metastasis-free interval was performed using ROC curves, Kaplan-Meier curves, and standard univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS:MIP significantly distinguished patients with distant metastatic recurrence from those without distant metastatic recurrence using ROC curve analysis (AUC = 0.695; P = 0.008). We defined high- and low-risk groups based on the cutoff defined by this ROC curve and find that MIP correlates with both DSS and overall survival by ROC curve analysis (AUC = 0.719; P = 0.004 and AUC = 0.698; P = 0.004, respectively). Univariable Cox regression reveals that a high-risk MIP score correlates with DSS (P = 0.015; HR = 3.2). CONCLUSIONS:MIP identifies patients with low risk of death from melanoma and may constitute a clinical tool to stratify patients with stage II-III melanoma for enrollment in clinical trials.

SUBMITTER: Gartrell RD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6594682 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Validation of Melanoma Immune Profile (MIP), a Prognostic Immune Gene Prediction Score for Stage II-III Melanoma.

Gartrell Robyn D RD Marks Douglas K DK Rizk Emanuelle M EM Bogardus Margaret M Gérard Camille L CL Barker Luke W LW Fu Yichun Y Esancy Camden L CL Li Gen G Ji Jiayi J Rui Shumin S Ernstoff Marc S MS Taback Bret B Pabla Sarabjot S Chang Rui R Lee Sandra J SJ Krolewski John J JJ Morrison Carl C Horst Basil A BA Saenger Yvonne M YM

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 20190115 8

<h4>Purpose</h4>Biomarkers are needed to stratify patients with stage II-III melanoma for clinical trials of adjuvant therapy because, while immunotherapy is protective, it also confers the risk of severe toxicity. We previously defined and validated a 53-immune gene melanoma immune profile (MIP) predictive both of distant metastatic recurrence and of disease-specific survival (DSS). Here, we test MIP on a third independent population.<h4>Experimental design</h4>A retrospective cohort of 78 pati ...[more]

PMID: 30647081

Similar Datasets

Project description:Prediction of outcome for melanoma patients with surgically-resected macroscopic nodal metastases is very imprecise. We performed a comprehensive clinicopathologic assessment of fresh-frozen macroscopic nodal metastases and the preceding primary melanoma, somatic mutation profiling and gene expression profiling to identify determinants of outcome in 79 melanoma patients. In addition to disease stage <II at initial presentation, the following clinical and pathologic factors were independent predictors of improved outcome (ORs for survival >4yr, 90%CI): presence of a nodular component in the primary melanoma (6.8, 0.6-76.0), and small cell size (11.1, 0.8-100.0) or low pigmentation (3.0, 0.8-100.0) in the nodal metastases. Absence of BRAF mutation (20.0, 1.0-1000.0) or NRAS mutation (16.7, 0.6-1000.0) were both favourable prognostic factors. A 46-gene expression signature with strong over-representation of immune response genes was predictive of better survival (10.9, 0.4-325.6); in the full cohort median survival was >100 months in those with the signature, but 10 months in those without. This relationship was validated in two previously published independent stage III melanoma datasets. We conclude that the presence of BRAF mutation, NRAS mutation and absence of an immune-related expressed gene profile predict poor outcome in melanoma patients with macroscopic stage III disease. Samples eligible for this study (n=79) were obtained from lymph node specimens (Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) Biospecimen Bank) in which macroscopic tumor was observed, obtained from patients believed to be without distant metastases at the time of tumor banking based on clinical examination and computerised axial tomographic scanning of the brain, chest, abdomen and pelvis. Specimens were macro-dissected at time of banking and subsequently reviewed to meet minimum criteria for tumor cell content (>80%) and amount of necrosis (<30%). Linked clinical and pathologic data were obtained from the MIA research database. Total RNA was extracted from 20-30mg of fresh frozen tissue. Tissue samples were homogenized using a high-speed agitation polytron blender (Kinematica, Luzern, Switzerland) in the presence of Trizol. The RNA was isolated and purified with an RNeasy purification kit (Qiagen RNeasy purification kit- Qiagen Pty Ltd., Clifton Hill, Victoria, Australia) with DNAse I digestion on the column. The quality of the RNA preparations was assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyser (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). RNA integrity scores were >8 for all samples analyzed. cRNA amplification and labelling with biotin were performed using Illumina TotalPrep RNA amplification kit according to the manufacturer’s directions (Ambion, Inc., Austin, TX, USA) with 250ng total RNA as input material. Gene expression analysis was performed using the Sentrix Human-6 v3 Expression BeadChips (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and BeadStation system from Illumina as per manufacturer’s instructions. Expression BeadChip using array annotation based on R-2.11.0 and illuminaHumanv3.db. Quality control was performed on all chips using R/Bioconductor and the lumi package (www.bioconductor.org). Data normalization was performed using a variance-stabilizing transform (VST) and quantile normalization as implemented in the lumi package for R/Bioconductor.

Dataset Information

Validation of Melanoma Immune Profile (MIP), a Prognostic Immune Gene Prediction Score for Stage II-III Melanoma.

Publications

Validation of Melanoma Immune Profile (MIP), a Prognostic Immune Gene Prediction Score for Stage II-III Melanoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets