Dataset Information

Directional allelic imbalance profiling and visualization from multi-sample data with RECUR.

ABSTRACT: MOTIVATION:Genetic analysis of cancer regularly includes two or more samples from the same patient. Somatic copy number alterations leading to allelic imbalance (AI) play a critical role in cancer initiation and progression. Directional analysis and visualization of the alleles in imbalance in multi-sample settings allow for inference of recurrent mutations, providing insights into mutation rates, clonality and the genomic architecture and etiology of cancer. RESULTS:The REpeat Chromosomal changes Uncovered by Reflection (RECUR) is an R application for the comparative analysis of AI profiles derived from SNP array and next-generation sequencing data. The algorithm accepts genotype calls and 'B allele' frequencies (BAFs) from at least two samples derived from the same individual. For a predefined set of genomic regions with AI, RECUR compares BAF values among samples. In the presence of AI, the expected value of a BAF can shift in two possible directions, reflecting an increased or decreased abundance of the maternal haplotype, relative to the paternal. The phenomenon of opposite haplotype shifts, or 'mirrored subclonal allelic imbalance', is a form of heterogeneity, and has been linked to clinico-pathological features of cancer. RECUR detects such genomic segments of opposite haplotypes in imbalance and plots BAF values for all samples, using a two-color scheme for intuitive visualization. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION:RECUR is available as an R application. Source code and documentation are available at scheet.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

SUBMITTER: Jakubek YA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6596882 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Directional allelic imbalance profiling and visualization from multi-sample data with RECUR.

Jakubek Yasminka A YA San Lucas F Anthony FA Scheet Paul P

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 20190701 13

<h4>Motivation</h4>Genetic analysis of cancer regularly includes two or more samples from the same patient. Somatic copy number alterations leading to allelic imbalance (AI) play a critical role in cancer initiation and progression. Directional analysis and visualization of the alleles in imbalance in multi-sample settings allow for inference of recurrent mutations, providing insights into mutation rates, clonality and the genomic architecture and etiology of cancer.<h4>Results</h4>The REpeat Ch ...[more]

PMID: 30462146

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOne method of identifying cis regulatory differences is to analyze allele-specific expression (ASE) and identify cases of allelic imbalance (AI). RNA-seq is the most common way to measure ASE and a binomial test is often applied to determine statistical significance of AI. This implicitly assumes that there is no bias in estimation of AI. However, bias has been found to result from multiple factors including: genome ambiguity, reference quality, the mapping algorithm, and biases in the sequencing process. Two alternative approaches have been developed to handle bias: adjusting for bias using a statistical model and filtering regions of the genome suspected of harboring bias. Existing statistical models which account for bias rely on information from DNA controls, which can be cost prohibitive for large intraspecific studies. In contrast, data filtering is inexpensive and straightforward, but necessarily involves sacrificing a portion of the data.ResultsHere we propose a flexible Bayesian model for analysis of AI, which accounts for bias and can be implemented without DNA controls. In lieu of DNA controls, this Poisson-Gamma (PG) model uses an estimate of bias from simulations. The proposed model always has a lower type I error rate compared to the binomial test. Consistent with prior studies, bias dramatically affects the type I error rate. All of the tested models are sensitive to misspecification of bias. The closer the estimate of bias is to the true underlying bias, the lower the type I error rate. Correct estimates of bias result in a level alpha test.ConclusionsTo improve the assessment of AI, some forms of systematic error (e.g., map bias) can be identified using simulation. The resulting estimates of bias can be used to correct for bias in the PG model, without data filtering. Other sources of bias (e.g., unidentified variant calls) can be easily captured by DNA controls, but are missed by common filtering approaches. Consequently, as variant identification improves, the need for DNA controls will be reduced. Filtering does not significantly improve performance and is not recommended, as information is sacrificed without a measurable gain. The PG model developed here performs well when bias is known, or slightly misspecified. The model is flexible and can accommodate differences in experimental design and bias estimation.

Dataset Information

Directional allelic imbalance profiling and visualization from multi-sample data with RECUR.

Publications

Directional allelic imbalance profiling and visualization from multi-sample data with RECUR.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets