Dataset Information

Initial application of a human laboratory model for estimating the motivational substitutability of e-cigarettes for combustible cigarettes.

ABSTRACT: This pilot study tested a novel human laboratory model for estimating the extent to which electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) serve as motivational substitutes for combustible cigarettes. The model assesses 3 parameters of substitutability, including the: (a) increase in motivational reward value of e-cigarettes after tobacco deprivation; (b) reduction in the reward value of combustible cigarettes after e-cigarette administration; and (c) comparability of the withdrawal-suppressing effects of e-cigarettes versus combustible cigarettes. Dual users (daily smokers, vaped 4+ days/week, M age = 35.3) attended 4 visits after 16-h tobacco product abstinence. For 2 visits, participants completed withdrawal measures and a task assessing smoking's reward value preceded by either: satiation by vaping or sustained tobacco product deprivation. For 2 other visits, participants completed withdrawal measures and a task assessing vaping's reward value preceded by either: continued deprivation versus satiation by smoking. Tobacco product deprivation (vs. satiation by smoking) increased vaping's reward value, indicated by nonsignificantly greater likelihood of initiating vaping versus abstaining for money (d = -.26; adjusted p [padj] = .08) and more vaping episodes purchased (? = .22; padj = .08). Satiation by vaping (vs. deprivation) nonsignificantly reduced smoking initiation (d = .46; padj = .09) and significantly decreased number of cigarettes purchased (? = -.29; padj = .04). Relative to deprivation, vaping suppressed withdrawal-related negative affect, smoking and vape urge, and anhedonia (ds ? .54). The magnitude of vaping-induced and smoking-induced withdrawal suppression did not significantly differ for all outcomes other than smoking urge, which was more strongly reduced by smoking (d = -1.57) than vaping (d = -.64). Future application and extension of this model may advance tobacco regulatory science and policy addressing e-cigarette use among smokers. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

SUBMITTER: Leventhal AM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6599596 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Initial application of a human laboratory model for estimating the motivational substitutability of e-cigarettes for combustible cigarettes.

Leventhal Adam M AM Goldenson Nicholas I NI Aguirre Claudia G CG Huh Jimi J Kirkpatrick Matthew G MG

Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology 20190128 2

This pilot study tested a novel human laboratory model for estimating the extent to which electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) serve as motivational substitutes for combustible cigarettes. The model assesses 3 parameters of substitutability, including the: (a) increase in motivational reward value of e-cigarettes after tobacco deprivation; (b) reduction in the reward value of combustible cigarettes after e-cigarette administration; and (c) comparability of the withdrawal-suppressing effects of e ...[more]

PMID: 30688503

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionAlternative nicotine delivery products, including electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and heated tobacco products (HTPs), contain fewer toxicants than combustible cigarettes and offer a potential for harm reduction. Research on the substitutability of e-cigarettes and HTPs is crucial for understanding their impact on public health. This study examined subjective and behavioral preferences for an e-cigarette and HTP relative to participants' usual brand combustible cigarette (UBC) in African American and White smokers naïve to alternative products.Aims and methodsTwenty-two adult African American (n = 12) and White (n = 10) smokers completed randomized study sessions with their UBC and study provided e-cigarette and HTP. A concurrent choice task allowed participants to earn puffs of the products but placed UBC on a progressive ratio schedule, making puffs harder to earn, and e-cigarette and HTP on a fixed ratio schedule to assess behavioral preference for the products. Behavioral preference was then compared to self-reported subjective preference.ResultsMost participants had a subjective preference for UBC (n = 11, 52.4%), followed by an equal preference for e-cigarette (n = 5, 23.8%) and HTP (n = 5, 23.8%). During the concurrent choice task, participants showed a behavioral preference (i.e., more earned puffs) for the e-cigarette (n = 9, 42.9%), followed by HTP (n = 8, 38.1%), and UBC (n = 4, 19.1%). Participants earned significantly more puffs of the alternative products compared to UBC (p = .011) with no difference in earned puffs between e-cigarettes and HTP (p = .806).ConclusionsIn a simulated lab setting, African American and White smokers were willing to substitute UBC for an e-cigarette or HTP when the attainment of UBC became more difficult.Trial registrationNCT04646668.ImplicationsFindings suggest that African American and White smokers are willing to substitute their UBC for an alternative nicotine delivery product (e-cigarette or HTP) when the attainment of cigarettes became more difficult in a simulated lab setting. Findings require confirmation among a larger sample under real-world conditions but add to growing evidence suggesting the acceptability of alternative nicotine delivery products among racially diverse smokers. These data are important as policies that limit the availability or appeal of combustible cigarettes are considered or enacted.

Project description:IntroductionSmoking elevates catecholamines that increase the risk for cardiovascular disease. Sparse evidence exists about the effects of e-cigarettes and catecholamines. Higher levels of catecholamines could trigger the increased heart rate, blood pressure, and decreased vascular function reported with the use of e-cigarettes. We investigated the difference in urinary catecholamines and their metabolites before and after the use of an e-cigarette containing nicotine or cigarettes compared to no tobacco use.MethodsIn our observational cohort exposure study, healthy adults aged 21-45 years who were currently using e-cigarettes, cigarettes, or had never used tobacco, participated in an acute exposure visit using their most common tobacco product. Urine was collected before, 1, and 2 hours after a 3-second puff every 30 seconds for 10 minutes on an e-cigarette or straw or use of 1 cigarette. Urinary catecholamines and their metabolites were measured by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography. Participants (n=323) were grouped by the product used at the visit. We compared levels of creatinine normalized log-transformed urinary catecholamines and their metabolites across groups using Dunn's test following a Kruskal-Wallis test in unadjusted and demographically adjusted models.ResultsPrior to use, individuals who used cigarettes (n=70) had lower urinary metabolites from epinephrine, serotonin, and norepinephrine. No differences were seen in those who used e-cigarettes (n=171) and those who did not use tobacco (n=82). In fully adjusted models, 1 h after the use of a combustible or e-cigarette, log-transformed urinary metabolites from norepinephrine (β=1.22; 95% CI: 0.39-2.05, p=0.004 and β=1.06; 95% CI: 0.39-1.74, p=0.002), dopamine (β=0.37; 95% CI: 0.24-0.5, p<0.001 and β=0.15; 95% CI: 0.05-0.26, p<0.001), and epinephrine (β=1.89; 95% CI: 0.51-3.27, p=0.008 and β=1.49; 95% CI: 0.38-2.61, p=0.009) were elevated. In fully adjusted models, combustible cigarette use was associated with elevated urinary norepinephrine (β=0.46; 95% CI: 0.13-0.81, p=0.007) and dopamine (β=0.19; 95% CI: 0.06-0.31, p=0.003) 1 h after use.ConclusionsWe found that the use of both e-cigarettes and cigarettes was associated with elevated urinary catecholamines or their metabolites. Catecholamines could be useful as a biomarker of harm for tobacco use and considered by tobacco regulatory scientists in future research.

Project description:ImportanceUse of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is increasing. Measures of exposure to known tobacco-related toxicants among e-cigarette users will inform potential health risks to individual product users.ObjectivesTo estimate concentrations of tobacco-related toxicants among e-cigarette users and compare these biomarker concentrations with those observed in combustible cigarette users, dual users, and never tobacco users.Design, setting, and participantsA population-based, longitudinal cohort study was conducted in the United States in 2013-2014. Cross-sectional analysis was performed between November 4, 2016, and October 5, 2017, of biomarkers of exposure to tobacco-related toxicants collected by the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Participants included adults who provided a urine sample and data on tobacco use (N = 5105).ExposuresThe primary exposure was tobacco use, including current exclusive e-cigarette users (n = 247), current exclusive cigarette smokers (n = 2411), and users of both products (dual users) (n = 792) compared with never tobacco users (n = 1655).Main outcomes and measuresGeometric mean concentrations of 50 individual biomarkers from 5 major classes of tobacco product constituents were measured: nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).ResultsOf the 5105 participants, most were aged 35 to 54 years (weighted percentage, 38%; 95% CI, 35%-40%), women (60%; 95% CI, 59%-62%), and non-Hispanic white (61%; 95% CI, 58%-64%). Compared with exclusive e-cigarette users, never users had 19% to 81% significantly lower concentrations of biomarkers of exposure to nicotine, TSNAs, some metals (eg, cadmium and lead), and some VOCs (including acrylonitrile). Exclusive e-cigarette users showed 10% to 98% significantly lower concentrations of biomarkers of exposure, including TSNAs, PAHs, most VOCs, and nicotine, compared with exclusive cigarette smokers; concentrations were comparable for metals and 3 VOCs. Exclusive cigarette users showed 10% to 36% lower concentrations of several biomarkers than dual users. Frequency of cigarette use among dual users was positively correlated with nicotine and toxicant exposure.Conclusions and relevanceExclusive use of e-cigarettes appears to result in measurable exposure to known tobacco-related toxicants, generally at lower levels than cigarette smoking. Toxicant exposure is greatest among dual users, and frequency of combustible cigarette use is positively correlated with tobacco toxicant concentration. These findings provide evidence that using combusted tobacco cigarettes alone or in combination with e-cigarettes is associated with higher concentrations of potentially harmful tobacco constituents in comparison with using e-cigarettes alone.

Project description:BackgroundCigarette smoking is associated with an increase in cardiovascular disease risk, attributable in part to reactive volatile organic chemicals (VOCs). However, little is known about the extent of VOC exposure due to the use of other tobacco products.MethodsWe recruited 48 healthy, tobacco users in four groups: cigarette, smokeless tobacco, occasional users of first generation e-cigarette and e-cigarette menthol and 12 healthy nontobacco users. After abstaining for 48 h, tobacco users used an assigned product. Urine was collected at baseline followed by five collections over a 3-h period to measure urinary metabolites of VOCs, nicotine, and tobacco alkaloids.ResultsUrinary levels of nicotine were ≃2-fold lower in occasional e-cigarette and smokeless tobacco users than in the cigarette smokers; cotinine and 3-hydroxycotinine levels were similar in all groups. Compared with nontobacco users, e-cigarette users had higher levels of urinary metabolites of xylene, cyanide, styrene, ethylbenzene, and benzene at baseline and elevated urinary levels of metabolites of xylene, N,N-dimethylformamide, and acrylonitrile after e-cigarette use. Metabolites of acrolein, crotonaldehyde, and 1,3-butadiene were significantly higher in smokers than in users of other products or nontobacco users. VOC metabolite levels in smokeless tobacco group were comparable to those found in nonusers with the exception of xylene metabolite-2-methylhippuric acid (2MHA), which was almost three fold higher than in nontobacco users.ConclusionsSmoking results in exposure to a range of VOCs at concentrations higher than those observed with other products, and first generation e-cigarette use is associated with elevated levels of N,N-dimethylformamide and xylene metabolites.ImplicationsThis study shows that occasional users of first generation e-cigarettes have lower levels of nicotine exposure than the users of combustible cigarettes. Compared with combustible cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and smokeless tobacco products deliver lower levels of most VOCs, with the exception of xylene, N,N-dimethylformamide, and acrylonitrile, whose metabolite levels were higher in the urine of e-cigarette users than nontobacco users. Absence of anatabine in the urine of e-cigarette users suggests that measuring urinary levels of this alkaloid may be useful in distinguishing between users of e-cigarettes and combustible cigarettes. However, these results have to be validated in a larger cohortcomprised of users of e-cigarettes of multiple brands.

Dataset Information

Initial application of a human laboratory model for estimating the motivational substitutability of e-cigarettes for combustible cigarettes.

Publications

Initial application of a human laboratory model for estimating the motivational substitutability of e-cigarettes for combustible cigarettes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets