Dataset Information

Evaluation of simulation models to mimic the distortions introduced into squiggles by nanopore sequencers and segmentation algorithms.

ABSTRACT: Nucleotides ratcheted through the biomolecular pores of nanopore sequencers generate raw picoamperage currents, which are segmented into step-current level signals representing the nucleotide sequence. These 'squiggles' are a noisy, distorted representation of the underlying true stepped current levels due to experimental and algorithmic factors. We were interested in developing a simulation model to support a white-box approach to identify common distortions, rather than relying on commonly used black box neural network techniques for basecalling nanopore signals. Dynamic time warped-space averaging (DTWA) techniques can generate a consensus from multiple noisy signals without introducing key feature distortions that occur with standard averaging. As a preprocessing tool, DTWA could provide cleaner and more accurate current signals for direct RNA or DNA analysis tools. However, DTWA approaches need modification to take advantage of the a-priori knowledge regarding a common, underlying gold-standard RNA / DNA sequence. Using experimental data, we derive a simulation model to provide known squiggle distortion signals to assist in validating the performance of analysis tools such as DTWA. Simulation models were evaluated by comparing mocked and experimental squiggle characteristics from one Enolase mRNA squiggle group produced by an Oxford MinION nanopore sequencer, and cross-validated using other Enolase, Sequin R1_71_1 and Sequin R2_55_3 mRNA studies. New techniques identified high inserted but low deleted base rates, generating consistent x1.7 squiggle event to base called ratios. Similar probability density and cumulative distribution functions, PDF and CDF, were found across all studies. Experimental PDFs were not the normal distributions expected if squiggle distortion arose from segmentation algorithm artefacts, or through individual nucleotides randomly interacting with individual nanopores. Matching experimental and mocked CDFs required the assumption that there are unique features associated with individual raw-current data streams. Z-normalized signal-to-noise ratios suggest intrinsic sensor limitations being responsible for half the gold standard and noisy squiggle DTW differences.

SUBMITTER: Smith M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6638935 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of simulation models to mimic the distortions introduced into squiggles by nanopore sequencers and segmentation algorithms.

Smith Michael M Chan Rachel R Gordon Paul P

PloS one 20190718 7

Nucleotides ratcheted through the biomolecular pores of nanopore sequencers generate raw picoamperage currents, which are segmented into step-current level signals representing the nucleotide sequence. These 'squiggles' are a noisy, distorted representation of the underlying true stepped current levels due to experimental and algorithmic factors. We were interested in developing a simulation model to support a white-box approach to identify common distortions, rather than relying on commonly use ...[more]

PMID: 31318901

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the performance of the Pegasus-OCT (Visulytix Ltd) multiclass automated fluid segmentation algorithms on independent spectral domain optical coherence tomography data sets.MethodsThe Pegasus automated fluid segmentation algorithms were applied to three data sets with edematous pathology, comprising 750, 600, and 110 b-scans, respectively. Intraretinal fluid (IRF), sub-retinal fluid (SRF), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) were automatically segmented by Pegasus-OCT for each b-scan where ground truth from data set owners was available. Detection performance was assessed by calculating sensitivities and specificities, while Dice coefficients were used to assess agreement between the segmentation methods.ResultsFor two data sets, IRF detection yielded promising sensitivities (0.98 and 0.94, respectively) and specificities (1.00 and 0.98) but less consistent agreement with the ground truth (dice coefficients 0.81 and 0.59); likewise, SRF detection showed high sensitivity (0.86 and 0.98) and specificity (0.83 and 0.89) but less consistent agreement (0.59 and 0.78). PED detection on the first data set showed moderate agreement (0.66) with high sensitivity (0.97) and specificity (0.98). IRF detection in a third data set yielded less favorable agreement (0.46-0.57) and sensitivity (0.59-0.68), attributed to image quality and ground truth grader discordance.ConclusionsThe Pegasus automated fluid segmentation algorithms were able to detect IRF, SRF, and PED in SD-OCT b-scans acquired across multiple independent data sets. Dice coefficients and sensitivity and specificity values indicate the potential for application to automated detection and monitoring of retinal diseases such as age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema.Translational relevanceThe potential of Pegasus-OCT for automated fluid quantification and differentiation of IRF, SRF, and PED in OCT images has application to both clinical practice and research.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of simulation models to mimic the distortions introduced into squiggles by nanopore sequencers and segmentation algorithms.

Publications

Evaluation of simulation models to mimic the distortions introduced into squiggles by nanopore sequencers and segmentation algorithms.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets