Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Misclassification of the actual causes of death and its impact on analysis: A case study in non-small cell lung cancer.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:Cumulative incidence of lung cancer deaths (LC-CID) is an important metric to understand cancer prognosis and to determine treatment options. However, credible estimates of LC-CID rely on accurate cause-of-death coding in death certificates. Results from lung cancer screening trials estimated 15% under-reporting and 1% over-reporting of lung cancer deaths due to misclassification. This study investigated the impact of cause-of-death misclassification on the estimation of LC-CID. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry were included. LC-CID was estimated using the competing-risk approach in two ways: (1) reporting observed estimates that ignore potential cause-of-death misclassification and (2) correcting for plausible misclassification rates reported in the literature (15% under-reporting and 1% over-reporting). Bias was quantified as the difference between observed and corrected 10-year LC-CIDs: positive values indicated that observed LC-CID overestimated true LC-CID, whereas negative values indicated the opposite. RESULTS:Among 66,179 patients, the impact of over-reporting on 10-year LC-CID was negligible across all age groups. In contrast, under-reporting resulted in substantial underestimation of 10-year LC-CID. The biases increased as age increased due to higher LC-CIDs: 10-year LC-CIDs among stage I patients 18-44, 45-59, 60-74 and ?75 years were 25%, 32%, 41%, and 50%, respectively, and the corresponding biases given the plausible misclassification rates were -4.4%, -5.6%, -7.1%, and -8.6%. Because the observed LC-CIDs among patients with stage II disease were higher than those with stage I disease, the biases were greater among stage II patients, up to -12.5% in the oldest age group. CONCLUSIONS:In lung cancer, LC-CID may be severely underestimated due to under-reporting of lung cancer deaths, particularly among older patients or those with late-stage disease. Future studies that involve such subpopulations should present the corrected LC-CIDs based on plausible misclassification rates alongside the observed LC-CIDs.

SUBMITTER: Tan KS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6650158 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Misclassification of the actual causes of death and its impact on analysis: A case study in non-small cell lung cancer.

Tan Kay See KS  

Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 20190516


<h4>Objectives</h4>Cumulative incidence of lung cancer deaths (LC-CID) is an important metric to understand cancer prognosis and to determine treatment options. However, credible estimates of LC-CID rely on accurate cause-of-death coding in death certificates. Results from lung cancer screening trials estimated 15% under-reporting and 1% over-reporting of lung cancer deaths due to misclassification. This study investigated the impact of cause-of-death misclassification on the estimation of LC-CI  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4068811 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7480475 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9691859 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6445096 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9254402 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6125250 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6461857 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5763244 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4910912 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5410347 | biostudies-literature