Dataset Information

Immediate Antihypertensive Treatment for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With or Without History of Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the CATIS Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Clinical trials have generally shown a neutral effect of early blood pressure (BP) decreases on clinical outcomes after acute ischemic stroke. Whether the effect of early antihypertensive therapy differs for patients with ischemic stroke with or without prior hypertension is unclear.

Objective

To investigate the association between immediate antihypertensive treatment and patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of hypertension before stroke onset.

Design, setting, and participants

This study was a prespecified subgroup analysis of the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS), a multicenter, single-blind, blinded end-points randomized clinical trial of 4071 patients with acute ischemic stroke and elevated systolic BP. Patients were recruited from August 2009 to May 2013, and this statistical analysis was performed using the intention-to-treat population from January to October 2018.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned to receive antihypertensive treatment (aimed at decreasing systolic BP by 10%-25% within the first 24 hours after randomization, achieving systolic BP <140 mm Hg and diastolic BP <90 mm Hg within 7 days, and maintaining this level during hospitalization) or to the control arm (discontinued all antihypertensive medications).

Main outcomes and measures

Primary outcome was a combination of death and major disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≥3; range 0-6, with higher values indicating greater disability) at 14 days or hospital discharge.

Results

In total, 2038 patients were randomized to receive antihypertensive treatment, and 2033 patients were randomized to the control group. The mean (SD) age was 62.0 (10.9) years, and 2604 participants (64.0%) were men. At day 14 or hospital discharge, the primary outcome was not different between the treatment and control groups among patients with or without prior hypertension (P = .97 for homogeneity): odds ratios (ORs) associated with treatment were 1.00 (95% CI, 0.87-1.16) for patients with prior hypertension and 1.00 (95% CI, 0.75-1.32) for patients without. Early antihypertensive treatment was associated with different rates of 3-month recurrent stroke (patients with hypertension: OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.77 vs without hypertension: OR, 3.43; 95% CI, 0.94-12.55; P = .005 for homogeneity) and vascular events (patients with hypertension: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.43-1.02 vs those without hypertension: OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 0.75-4.83; P = .04 for homogeneity) by hypertension history.

Conclusions and relevance

Among patients with acute ischemic stroke, early antihypertensive treatment was not associated with different death and major disability outcomes by hypertension history. However, early antihypertension therapy was associated with a decreased rate of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of hypertension and may inform future studies in the optimal approach to hypertension management in the setting of acute ischemic stroke.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01840072.

SUBMITTER: Zhang R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6669782 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Immediate Antihypertensive Treatment for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With or Without History of Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the CATIS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Zhang Rui R Zhong Chongke C Zhang Yonghong Y Xie Xuewei X Zhu Zhengbao Z Wang Aili A Chen Chung-Shiuan CS Peng Yanbo Y Peng Hao H Li Qunwei Q Ju Zhong Z Geng Deqin D Chen Jing J Liu Liping L Wang Yilong Y Xu Tan T He Jiang J

JAMA network open 20190703 7

<h4>Importance</h4>Clinical trials have generally shown a neutral effect of early blood pressure (BP) decreases on clinical outcomes after acute ischemic stroke. Whether the effect of early antihypertensive therapy differs for patients with ischemic stroke with or without prior hypertension is unclear.<h4>Objective</h4>To investigate the association between immediate antihypertensive treatment and patient outcomes according to the presence or absence of hypertension before stroke onset.<h4>Desig ...[more]

PMID: 31365109

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke II (CATIS-2) suggests that early antihypertensive treatment did not reduce the risk of dependency or death in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), compared with delayed treatment. Single subcortical infarction (SSI) is an important stroke subtype, and the association of antihypertensive timing with clinical outcomes is unclear.ObjectiveTo investigate the association of early vs delayed antihypertensive treatment with clinical outcomes in patients with SSI, stratified by the presence of parent artery disease (PAD) stenosis.Design, setting, and participantsThis secondary analysis of the CATIS-2 randomized clinical trial included 106 hospitals in China between June 2018 and July 2022. In CATIS-2, patients with AIS within 24 to 48 hours of symptoms onset and elevated systolic blood pressure were eligible. Patients with SSI detected in diffusion-weighted imaging were included in the current post hoc subgroup analysis. Patients were grouped into (1) SSI with PAD stenosis and (2) SSI without PAD stenosis. Statistical analysis was performed from July 2023 to May 2024.ExposuresEarly (immediate) vs delayed (starting on day 8) antihypertensive therapy.Main outcome and measurePrimary outcome was the combination of functional dependency or death (modified Rankin Scale score ≥3) at 90 days.ResultsAmong 997 patients with SSI in CATIS-2 (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [9.8] years; 612 [61.4%] men), 116 (11.6%) had SSI with PAD and 881 (88.4%) had SSI without PAD. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between early and delayed antihypertensive treatment groups among all patients with SSI (8.8% vs 7.1%; OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.79-1.99]; P = .34). Among patients with SSI with PAD, early antihypertensive treatment was associated with increased risk of the primary outcome compared with delayed treatment (23.4% vs 7.7%; OR, 3.67 [95% CI, 1.14-11.86]; P = .03); this finding was not observed in patients with SSI without PAD (6.6% vs 7.1%; OR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.55-1.57]; P = .77). Significant interaction with treatment and presence of PAD stenosis was detected for the primary outcome (P for interaction = .04).Conclusions and relevanceIn this secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, early antihypertensive treatment was associated with an increased risk of functional dependency or death at 90 days among patients with SSI and coexisting PAD stenosis, compared with delayed antihypertensive treatment. Further studies are warranted for individualized BP management in patients with SSI by the presence of PAD.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03479554.

Project description:Background and objectivesEvidence on the associations between baseline stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1 and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients is lacking. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between plasma SDF-1 levels and clinical outcomes based on a large multicenter study of the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CATIS).MethodsSecondary analysis was conducted among 3,255 participants from the CATIS trial with a baseline measurement of plasma SDF-1 levels. We evaluated the associations between plasma SDF-1 levels and one-year recurrent stroke, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality using Cox regression models. We further investigated the prognostic effect of SDF-1 on clinical outcomes in patients with different characteristics.ResultsHigher plasma SDF-1 levels were not associated with recurrent stroke, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality at one-year after ischemic stroke (all P trend ≥ 0.05). There were significant interactions between plasma SDF-1 levels and history of diabetes mellitus on recurrent stroke (P = 0.005), cardiovascular events (P = 0.007) and all-cause mortality (P = 0.04) at one year. In patients with diabetes mellitus, plasma SDF-1 was significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events after adjustment for confounders. For example, 1-SD higher log-SDF-1 was associated with a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.65 (1.18-2.32) for recurrent stroke and 1.47 (1.08-1.99) for the cardiovascular events, but not all-cause mortality 1.36 (0.96-1.93) at one year. However, there were no associations between plasma SDF-1 and clinical outcomes in patients without diabetes mellitus (all P > 0.05). The addition of plasma SDF-1 to the conventional risk factors model significantly improved the risk prediction of all outcomes. Similarly, findings between elevated SDF-1 levels and two-year outcomes were found only in patients with diabetes mellitus.ConclusionsElevated plasma SDF-1 was significantly associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke and cardiovascular events only in ischemic patients with diabetes mellitus.

Project description:BackgroundClinical trials have generally showed a neutral effect of blood pressure (BP) reduction on clinical outcomes among acute ischemic stroke patients. We conducted a prespecified subgroup analysis to assess whether disease severity modifies the effect of early antihypertensive treatment on death and disability among patients with acute ischemic stroke.MethodsIn the China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke, 4,071 patients with acute ischemic stroke and elevated BP were randomly assigned to receive antihypertensive treatment or to discontinue all hypertension medications within 48 h of symptom onset. The primary outcome was a combination of death and major disability at 14 days or hospital discharge. In this subgroup analysis, participants were categorized into 3 groups according to their baseline NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (0-4, 5-15, or ≥16).ResultsAt 24 h after randomization, mean systolic BP differences (95% CIs) were -8.5 (-10.0 to -7.1), -9.8 (-11.4 to -8.3), and -9.1 (-14.4 to -3.8) mm Hg between the treatment and control groups (all p values <0.001) for patients with a baseline NIHSS score of 0-4, 5-15, and ≥16, respectively. At day 7 after randomization, the corresponding mean systolic BP differences were -9.3 (-10.5 to -8.2), -9.1 (-10.3 to -7.8), and -10.1 (-15.1 to -5.1) mm Hg between the treatment and control groups (all p values <0.001). The primary outcome was not significantly different between the treatment and control groups at day 14 or hospital discharge among all NIHSS subgroups (p value for homogeneity = 0.66). ORs (95% CI) associated with treatment were 1.14 (0.87-1.49, p = 0.33), 1.04 (0.86-1.25, p = 0.70), and 0.67 (0.18-2.44, p = 0.54) for patients with a baseline NIHSS score of 0-4, 5-15, and ≥16, respectively. The composite outcome of death and major disability at 3-month follow-up did not differ between the 2 comparison groups for all NIHSS subgroups. In addition, vascular events and recurrent stroke were not significantly different between the 2 comparison groups at the 3-month follow-up visit among all NIHSS subgroups except that there was a suggestive risk reduction for recurrent stroke among those with an NIHSS score of 5-15 (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-0.99, p = 0.05).ConclusionEarly BP reduction with antihypertensive medications did not reduce or increase the risk of death, major disabilities, recurrent instances of stroke, and vascular events in acute ischemic stroke patients with a variety of disease severities.

Project description:ContextCardiovascular disease (CVD) risk increases beginning at systolic blood pressure levels of 115 mm Hg. Use of antihypertensive medications among patients with a history of CVD or diabetes and without hypertension has been debated.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of antihypertensive treatment on secondary prevention of CVD events and all-cause mortality among persons without clinically defined hypertension.Data sourcesMeta-analysis with systematic search of MEDLINE (1950 to week 3 of January 2011), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials and manual examination of references in selected articles and studies.Study selectionFrom 874 potentially relevant publications, 25 trials that fulfilled the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis.Data extractionInformation on participant characteristics, trial design and duration, treatment drug, dose, control, and clinical events were extracted using a standardized protocol. Outcomes included stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), composite CVD outcomes, CVD mortality, and all-cause mortality.ResultsCompared with controls, participants receiving antihypertensive medications had a pooled relative risk of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.98) for stroke, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.93) for MI, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.77) for CHF, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90) for composite CVD events, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99) for CVD mortality, and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.95) for all-cause mortality from random-effects models. The corresponding absolute risk reductions per 1000 persons were -7.7 (95% CI, -15.2 to -0.3) for stroke, -13.3 (95% CI, -28.4 to 1.7) for MI, -43.6 (95% CI, -65.2 to -22.0) for CHF events, -27.1 (95% CI, -40.3 to -13.9) for composite CVD events, -15.4 (95% CI, -32.5 to 1.7) for CVD mortality, and -13.7 (95% CI, -24.6 to -2.8) for all-cause mortality. Results did not differ according to trial characteristics or subgroups defined by clinical history.ConclusionsAmong patients with clinical history of CVD but without hypertension, antihypertensive treatment was associated with decreased risk of stroke, CHF, composite CVD events, and all-cause mortality. Additional randomized trial data are necessary to assess these outcomes in patients without CVD clinical recommendations.

Dataset Information

Immediate Antihypertensive Treatment for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With or Without History of Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the CATIS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance

Objective

Design, setting, and participants

Interventions

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Trial registration

Publications

Immediate Antihypertensive Treatment for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With or Without History of Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the CATIS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets