Minimally invasive endoscopic management of buried bumper syndrome by use of a novel dedicated resection device.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Costa D
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6675916 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7570444 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Tube removal by endoscopic submucosal dissection using needle and insulation-tipped diathermic knives against buried bumper syndrome is a reliable, noninvasive and safe procedure.
| S-EPMC6787815 | biostudies-other
Project description:ObjectiveThis study was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of large duodenal lipomas (DLs) of ≥2 cm between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR).MethodsThis retrospective study included patients who underwent endoscopic resection of large DLs from June 2017 to March 2021 at our hospital. Clinicopathologic features, clinical outcomes, and follow-up endoscopy findings were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsTwenty-three patients (12 men) with a mean age of 57.4 years were included. The median tumor size was 28.4 ± 13.3 mm. ESD was performed in 19 patients, and EFTR was performed in 4. Complete resection was achieved in 21 patients. The operative time and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the ESD than EFTR group. Four patients in the EFTR group developed a fever; no other adverse events occurred. No patients required surgical intervention. During the average follow-up of 21.1 months, no residual tumor, recurrence, or metastasis was observed.ConclusionBoth ESD and EFTR provide minimally invasive, localized treatment of selected DLs. ESD might have some advantages in resecting large DLs in terms of procedure time and hospitalization.
| S-EPMC8721732 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBuried bumper syndrome (BBS) is an uncommon but significant complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), which occurs due to overgrowth of gastric mucosa over the inner bumper of the gastrostomy tube. A high incidence of BBS was observed in patients with Freka PEG tubes.ObjectiveTo review case numbers of BBS and confirm the observed association with Freka tubes to determine whether change of practice should be considered.DesignData was collected on the number of cases of BBS reported to the community nutrition team Birmingham, UK. Data on type of PEG kit and total number of PEGs inserted between 2009 and 2013 were collected. The electronic endoscopy reporting database was used to compare case numbers of BBS in our Trust in years when Corflo and Freka PEG tubes were used, respectively. Data from our Trust were also compared with that from a Trust using Corflo only.ResultsFifty-eight cases of BBS were reported in the area covered by the Birmingham community nutrition team between 2009 and 2013, all of which were associated with Freka PEG tubes. An estimated 1000-1200 PEGs were inserted during this period, representing an incidence of BBS of 4.8-5.8%. No cases of BBS occurred over the same period in the comparison Trust (451 Corflo PEGs inserted).ConclusionsOur review confirmed our observation of an increased risk of BBS with Freka PEG tubes. Clinicians should be aware of our findings when deciding which brand of PEG tube to insert, particularly in patients with a previous history of BBS.
| S-EPMC5369583 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPancreatic resections are among the most technically demanding procedures, including a high risk of potentially life-threatening complications and outcomes strongly correlated to hospital volume and individual surgeon experience. Minimally invasive pancreatic resections (MIPRs) have become a part of standard surgical practice worldwide over the last decade; however, in comparison with other surgical procedures, the implementation of minimally invasive approaches into clinical practice has been rather slow.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to highlight and summarize the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of minimally invasive approaches in pancreatic surgery.MethodsA WHO trial registry and Pubmed database literature search was performed to identify all RCTs comparing MIPRs (robot-assisted and/or laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy [DP] or pancreatoduodenectomy [PD]) with open pancreatic resections (OPRs).ResultsOverall, five RCTs on MIPR versus OPR have been published and seven RCTs are currently recruiting. For DP, the results of two RCTs were in favor of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) in terms of shorter hospital stay and less intraoperative blood loss, with comparable morbidity and mortality. Regarding PD, two RCTs showed similar advantages for MIPD. However, concerns were raised after the early termination of the third multicenter RCT on MIPD versus open PD due to higher complication-related mortality in the laparoscopic group and no clear other demonstrable advantages. No RCTs on robot-assisted pancreatic procedures are available as yet.ConclusionAt the current level of evidence, MIDP is thought to be safe and feasible, although oncological safety should be further evaluated. Based on the results of the RCTs conducted for PD, MIPD cannot be proclaimed as the superior alternative to open PD, although promising outcomes have been demonstrated by experienced centers. Future studies should provide answers to the role of robotic approaches in pancreatic surgery and aim to identity the subgroups of patients or indications with the greatest benefit of MIPRs.
| S-EPMC7892688 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Treatment of Boerhaave's syndrome is controversial. Formal thoracotomy and laparotomy were considered the gold standard treatment in the past. However, these approaches are associated with significant surgical trauma, stress, and postoperative pain. Recently published studies reported the application of minimally invasive surgery in the setting of such esophageal emergency. However, the application of minimally invasive surgery in the setting of Boerhaave's syndrome is debated and evidence is puzzled. The aim of this study was to summarize the current knowledge on minimally invasive treatment of Boerhaave's syndrome. PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were consulted. All articles that described the management of Boerhaave's syndrome in the setting of minimally invasive surgery (thoracoscopy or laparoscopy) were included. Sixteen studies and forty-eight patients were included. The age of the patient population ranged from 37 to 81 years old and 74% were males. The time shift period from symptoms onset to surgical treatment ranged from 5 to 240 hours with 10 patients (20.8%) having surgery more than 24 hours from symptoms onset. Vomiting (100%), chest/epigastric pain (88%), and dyspnea (62%) were the most commonly reported symptoms. The perforation size ranged from 6 to 30 mm with 96% of patients suffering from distal esophageal tear. Video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) was the most commonly reported surgical approach (75%), followed by laparoscopy (16.7%), and combined thoraco-laparoscopy (6.2%). In case of VATS, a left approach was adopted in 91% of patients with selective lung ventilation. Primary suture was the most commonly performed surgical procedure (60%) with interrupted single or dual-layer repair. Surgical debridement (25%), primary repair reinforced with gastric or omental patch (8%), esophageal repair over T-tube (6%), and endoscopic stenting combined with laparoscopic debridement (2%) were also reported. The postoperative morbidity was 64.5% with pneumonia (42%), pleural empyema (26%), and leak (19%) being the most commonly reported complications. The overall mortality was 8.3%. Boerhaave's syndrome is a rare entity. Minimally invasive surgical treatment seems promising, feasible, and safe in selected patients with early presentation and stable vital signs managed in referral centers. In the management algorithm of Boerhaave's syndrome, a definitive indication to adopt minimally invasive surgery is lacking and its potential role mandates further analysis.
| S-EPMC7475560 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The quad tendon has increasingly became a very common option for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Minimally invasive approaches are one of the many advantages to the quad tendon graft. One of the issues with a small incision is assuring appropriate proximal closure. In this technique, we use the arthroscope to view proximally and a Scorpion (Arthrex) device to close our proximal quad harvest. We also describe the updated preparation of the quad tendon with FiberTag TightRope (Arthrex) and FiberTag ABS (Arthrex). These implants have FiberTag incorporated to the suspensory devices that creates a stable construct that is faster to incorporate into the quad with the slotted clamp. Together, these updates to the preparation and harvest should make the construct more reproducible and decrease donor-site morbidity respectively.
| S-EPMC7823142 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo present the treatment algorithm, surgical technique, and results of a series of patients with spinal synovial cysts operated with minimally invasive techniques (MIS).IntroductionSpinal synovial cysts originate from the dilation and potential rupture of the synovial sheath of a facet joint. Surgical resection is considered the treatment of choice in symptomatic patients. The use of MIS techniques could reduce the disruption of the facet joint involved, reducing the risk of postoperative instability.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 21 patients with spinal synovial cysts operated by MIS approach and decompression. We analyzed the signs, symptoms, surgical time, hospital stay, evolution, and complications. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate pain and the Weiner scale and the modified Macnab criteria to measure the patient's postoperative satisfaction.ResultsA total of 21 patients were surgically treated with MIS technique; 76.2% (n = 16) did not require arthrodesis, the remaining 23.8% (n = 5) were fused. We performed 13 (61.9%) contralateral hemilaminectomies, 7 ipsilateral hemilaminectomies (33.3%), and 1 laminectomy in S1-S2. The average follow-up was 26 months; surgical time was 150.33 ± 63.31 min, with a hospital stay of 2.5 ± 1.78 days. The VAS decreased from 8.3 preoperatively to 2.3 postoperatively. Sixteen patients reported excellent results, four good and one regular in the scale of Macnab. 95.2% of patients perceived that the procedure was very/quite successful according to the Weiner scale.ConclusionThe minimally invasive approach is a safe and effective procedure for the complete resection of spinal synovial cysts. It provides excellent clinical-functional results by preserving muscles, ligaments, and joint facets.
| S-EPMC6416767 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Current brain tumor treatments are limited by the skull and BBB, leading to poor prognosis and short survival for glioma patients. We introduce a novel minimally-invasive brain tumor suppression (MIBTS) device combining personalized intracranial electric field therapy with in-situ chemotherapeutic coating. The core of our MIBTS technique is a wireless-ultrasound-powered, chip-sized, lightweight device with all functional circuits encapsulated in a small but efficient "Swiss-roll" structure, guaranteeing enhanced energy conversion while requiring tiny implantation windows (~3*5 mm), which favors broad consumers acceptance and easy-to-use of the device. Compared with existing technologies, competitive advantages in terms of tumor suppressive efficacy and therapeutic resolution were noticed, with maximum ~80% higher suppression effect than first-line chemotherapy and 50-70% higher than the most advanced tumor treating field technology. In addition, patient-personalized therapy strategies could be tuned from the MIBTS without increasing size or adding circuits on the integrated chip, ensuring the optimal therapeutic effect and avoid tumor resistance. These groundbreaking achievements of MIBTS offer new hope for controlling tumor recurrence and extending patient survival.
| S-SCDT-10_1038-S44321-024-00091-5 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundWe developed and implemented a pre-emptive pain management program wherein providers agreed to have non-opioid pain medication as a standard pain management strategy at discharge accompanied by patient education about the program.MethodsA retrospective case-control study of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent minimally invasive pulmonary resection. We compared the outcomes among patients who were managed with pre-emptive pain management program with enhanced recovery after surgery (Pre-emptive), enhanced recovery program after surgery alone (ERAS) and standard care (control).ResultsOf the 443 patients, 132 patients (30%) were in the pre-emptive pain management group, 90 (20%) patients were in the ERAS only group and 221 (50%) in the control group. There were significantly fewer complications (15.9% vs. 23.3% vs. 38%, P<0.001), shorter median length of hospital stay (2 vs. 3 vs. 3 days, P<0.001), lower 30-day readmission rates (2.3% vs. 3.3% vs. 11.3%, P=0.002), and fewer opioid prescriptions at discharge (17.4% vs. 76.7% vs. 83.7%, P<0.001) in the pre-emptive pain management group compared to the ERAS and control groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the pre-emptive pain management program (OR 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03, 0.11, P<0.001) and robotic surgery (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.3, 0.88, P=0.02) were associated with lower odds of patients being discharged to home with opioid prescriptions. The median pain score in the pre-emptive pain group at 30 days after surgery was 1.5 on a pain scale of 1–10.ConclusionsThe pre-emptive pain management program was associated with a decrease in opioid prescriptions after elective pulmonary resections. Successful implementation of this program can lead to significant decreases in the amount of prescription opioids in the community.
| S-EPMC7330317 | biostudies-literature