Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Method for Improving the Accuracy and Efficiency of Bacteriophage Genome Annotation.


ABSTRACT: Bacteriophages are the most numerous entities on Earth. The number of sequenced phage genomes is approximately 8000 and increasing rapidly. Sequencing of a genome is followed by annotation, where genes, start codons, and functions are putatively identified. The mainstays of phage genome annotation are auto-annotation programs such as Glimmer and GeneMark. Due to the relatively small size of phage genomes, many groups choose to manually curate auto-annotation results to increase accuracy. An additional benefit of manual curation of auto-annotated phage genomes is that the process is amenable to be performed by students, and has been shown to improve student recruitment to the sciences. However, despite its greater accuracy and pedagogical value, manual curation suffers from high labor cost, lack of standardization and a degree of subjectivity in decision making, and susceptibility to mistakes. Here, we present a method developed in our lab that is designed to produce accurate annotations while reducing subjectivity and providing a degree of standardization in decision-making. We show that our method produces genome annotations more accurate than auto-annotation programs while retaining the pedagogical benefits of manual genome curation.

SUBMITTER: Salisbury A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6678273 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A Method for Improving the Accuracy and Efficiency of Bacteriophage Genome Annotation.

Salisbury Alicia A   Tsourkas Philippos K PK  

International journal of molecular sciences 20190710 14


Bacteriophages are the most numerous entities on Earth. The number of sequenced phage genomes is approximately 8000 and increasing rapidly. Sequencing of a genome is followed by annotation, where genes, start codons, and functions are putatively identified. The mainstays of phage genome annotation are auto-annotation programs such as Glimmer and GeneMark. Due to the relatively small size of phage genomes, many groups choose to manually curate auto-annotation results to increase accuracy. An addi  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5314790 | biostudies-literature
2019-07-01 | PXD009672 | Pride
2019-07-01 | PXD009697 | Pride
| S-EPMC3142524 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5906903 | biostudies-literature
2016-05-27 | PXD002967 | Pride
| S-EPMC3371851 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4952227 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5833154 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1808025 | biostudies-literature