Dataset Information

Patterns and Mechanisms of Diminishing Returns from Beneficial Mutations.

ABSTRACT: Diminishing returns epistasis causes the benefit of the same advantageous mutation smaller in fitter genotypes and is frequently observed in experimental evolution. However, its occurrence in other contexts, environment dependence, and mechanistic basis are unclear. Here, we address these questions using 1,005 sequenced segregants generated from a yeast cross. Under each of 47 examined environments, 66-92% of tested polymorphisms exhibit diminishing returns epistasis. Surprisingly, improving environment quality also reduces the benefits of advantageous mutations even when fitness is controlled for, indicating the necessity to revise the global epistasis hypothesis. We propose that diminishing returns originates from the modular organization of life where the contribution of each functional module to fitness is determined jointly by the genotype and environment and has an upper limit, and demonstrate that our model predictions match empirical observations. These findings broaden the concept of diminishing returns epistasis, reveal its generality and potential cause, and have important evolutionary implications.

SUBMITTER: Wei X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6681633 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Patterns and Mechanisms of Diminishing Returns from Beneficial Mutations.

Wei Xinzhu X Zhang Jianzhi J

Molecular biology and evolution 20190501 5

Diminishing returns epistasis causes the benefit of the same advantageous mutation smaller in fitter genotypes and is frequently observed in experimental evolution. However, its occurrence in other contexts, environment dependence, and mechanistic basis are unclear. Here, we address these questions using 1,005 sequenced segregants generated from a yeast cross. Under each of 47 examined environments, 66-92% of tested polymorphisms exhibit diminishing returns epistasis. Surprisingly, improving env ...[more]

PMID: 30903691

Similar Datasets

Project description:In cooperative breeders, subordinates that have alternative reproductive options are expected to stay and help dominant breeders only as long as they contribute to group productivity, if their fitness is linked with colony success. Female Polistes dominula paper wasps live as cooperative breeders in small groups of typically fewer than 10 females. Subordinates tend to have high-quality outside options, and so could choose alternative breeding tactics if their work efforts increased productivity negligibly. In the founding stage before workers emerge, we tested the effect of various predictors on nest growth, as a proxy for group productivity, and explored the shape of the relationship between group size and nest growth. We found group size to be the only significant predictor of nest growth: variation among body sizes within the group showed no effect, suggesting a lack of size-dependent task specialization in this species. Average body size and average genetic relatedness between group members similarly showed no effects on nest growth. Group size had a non-linear effect so that per-capita benefits to nest growth decreased in larger groups, and groups of 10 or more would benefit negligibly from additional group members. Hence, females might be better off pursuing other options than joining a large group. This finding helps to explain why P. dominula groups are usually relatively small in our study population. Further studies may illuminate the mechanisms behind the smaller per-capita nest growth that we found in larger groups.Identifying which factors influence the productivity of animal groups is key to understanding why different species breed cooperatively in groups of varying sizes. In the paper wasp Polistes dominula, we investigated the growth rate of nests as a measure of group productivity. We found that average body size, the variation in body sizes within the group, and average genetic relatedness between group members did not affect nest growth, while group size had a strong, positive effect: nests grew faster with more group members, but the per-capita benefit decreased in larger groups. The addition of extra group members in groups of 10 or more had negligible effects on nest growth. Hence, wasps may be better off pursuing other options than joining large groups. This finding helps to explain why groups normally consist of fewer than 10 wasps in this population.

Dataset Information

Patterns and Mechanisms of Diminishing Returns from Beneficial Mutations.

Publications

Patterns and Mechanisms of Diminishing Returns from Beneficial Mutations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets