Dataset Information

Starless bias and parameter-estimation bias in the likelihood-based phylogenetic method.

ABSTRACT: I analyzed various site pattern combinations in a 4-OTU case to identify sources of starless bias and parameter-estimation bias in likelihood-based phylogenetic methods, and reported three significant contributions. First, the likelihood method is counterintuitive in that it may not generate a star tree with sequences that are equidistant from each other. This behaviour, dubbed starless bias, happens in a 4-OTU tree when there is an excess (i.e., more than expected from a star tree and a substitution model) of conflicting phylogenetic signals supporting the three resolved topologies equally. Special site pattern combinations leading to rejection of a star tree, when sequences are equidistant from each other, were identified. Second, fitting gamma distribution to model rate heterogeneity over sites is strongly confounded with tree topology, especially in conjunction with the starless bias. I present examples to show dramatic differences in the estimated shape parameter ? between a star tree and a resolved tree. There may be no rate heterogeneity over sites (with the estimated ? > 10000) when a star tree is imposed, but ? < 1 (suggesting strong rate heterogeneity over sites) when an (incorrect) resolved tree is imposed. Thus, the dependence of "rate heterogeneity" on tree topology implies that "rate heterogeneity" is not a sequence-specific feature, cautioning against interpreting a small ? to mean that some sites are under strong purifying selection and others not. Thirdly, because there is no existing (and working) likelihood method for evaluating a star tree with continuous gamma-distributed rate, I have implemented the method for JC69 in a self-contained R script for a four-OTU tree (star or resolved), in addition to another R script assuming a constant rate over sites. These R scripts should be useful for teaching and exploring likelihood methods in phylogenetics.

SUBMITTER: Xia X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6690233 | biostudies-literature | 2018

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Starless bias and parameter-estimation bias in the likelihood-based phylogenetic method.

Xia Xuhua X

AIMS genetics 20180101 4

I analyzed various site pattern combinations in a 4-OTU case to identify sources of starless bias and parameter-estimation bias in likelihood-based phylogenetic methods, and reported three significant contributions. First, the likelihood method is counterintuitive in that it may not generate a star tree with sequences that are equidistant from each other. This behaviour, dubbed starless bias, happens in a 4-OTU tree when there is an excess (i.e., more than expected from a star tree and a substit ...[more]

PMID: 31435522

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe UN's Sustainable Development Goals are devoted to eradicate a range of infectious diseases to achieve global well-being. These efforts require monitoring disease transmission at a level that differentiates between pathogen variants at the genetic/molecular level. In fact, the advantages of genetic (molecular) measures like multiplicity of infection (MOI) over traditional metrics, e.g., R0, are being increasingly recognized. MOI refers to the presence of multiple pathogen variants within an infection due to multiple infective contacts. Maximum-likelihood (ML) methods have been proposed to derive MOI and pathogen-lineage frequencies from molecular data. However, these methods are biased.Methods and findingsBased on a single molecular marker, we derive a bias-corrected ML estimator for MOI and pathogen-lineage frequencies. We further improve these estimators by heuristical adjustments that compensate shortcomings in the derivation of the bias correction, which implicitly assumes that data lies in the interior of the observational space. The finite sample properties of the different variants of the bias-corrected estimators are investigated by a systematic simulation study. In particular, we investigate the performance of the estimator in terms of bias, variance, and robustness against model violations. The corrections successfully remove bias except for extreme parameters that likely yield uninformative data, which cannot sustain accurate parameter estimation. Heuristic adjustments further improve the bias correction, particularly for small sample sizes. The bias corrections also reduce the estimators' variances, which coincide with the Cramér-Rao lower bound. The estimators are reasonably robust against model violations.ConclusionsApplying bias corrections can substantially improve the quality of MOI estimates, particularly in areas of low as well as areas of high transmission-in both cases estimates tend to be biased. The bias-corrected estimators are (almost) unbiased and their variance coincides with the Cramér-Rao lower bound, suggesting that no further improvements are possible unless additional information is provided. Additional information can be obtained by combining data from several molecular markers, or by including information that allows stratifying the data into heterogeneous groups.

Dataset Information

Starless bias and parameter-estimation bias in the likelihood-based phylogenetic method.

Publications

Starless bias and parameter-estimation bias in the likelihood-based phylogenetic method.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets