Dataset Information

Using simulation to explore medical students' understanding of integrated care within geriatrics.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Given the increasing evidence and expansion of integrated care (IC) in healthcare, new IC curricula introduced early in undergraduate medical education (UME) are needed. Building on a pilot IC simulation called "Getting to Know Patients' System of Care" (GPS-Care), we aimed to explore students' understanding of patients' complex physical and mental health needs, and to increase our understanding of how students learned in this simulation.

Methods

177 of 259 first-year medical students participated in GPS-Care at the University of Toronto. Students role-played an elderly patient or caregiver within 5 simulated healthcare professional appointments. Students completed written reflections and 7 students participated in one-on-one interviews. A thematic analysis of the reflections and transcripts was conducted and descriptive data was generated for questionnaires.

Results

Data saturation was reached at 43 reflections and 7 transcripts and the following themes emerged: a) students reflected on patients' complex care experiences, b) students reflected on of the healthcare system needs care, c) students increased understanding of IC, and d) students desire to improve the care of IC patients within the healthcare system.

Conclusions

In addition to confirming previous pilot study themes, the results from this study identified the role of productive struggle to provide students with a deeper understanding of patients' IC care needs. Moreover, GPS-Care resulted in a transformative learning experience resulting in new insights into the importance of IC early in UME training.

SUBMITTER: Yang S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6712598 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Using simulation to explore medical students' understanding of integrated care within geriatrics.

Yang Samantha S Chaudhary Zarah Z Mylopoulos Maria M Hashmi Rida R Kwok Yvonne Y Colman Sarah S Yogaparan Thirumagal T Sockalingam Sanjeev S

BMC medical education 20190828 1

<h4>Background</h4>Given the increasing evidence and expansion of integrated care (IC) in healthcare, new IC curricula introduced early in undergraduate medical education (UME) are needed. Building on a pilot IC simulation called "Getting to Know Patients' System of Care" (GPS-Care), we aimed to explore students' understanding of patients' complex physical and mental health needs, and to increase our understanding of how students learned in this simulation.<h4>Methods</h4>177 of 259 first-year m ...[more]

PMID: 31455354

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundImproving clinical reasoning skills-the thought processes used by clinicians to formulate appropriate questions and diagnoses-is essential for reducing missed diagnostic opportunities. The electronic Clinical Reasoning Educational Simulation Tool (eCREST) was developed to improve the clinical reasoning of future physicians. A feasibility trial demonstrated acceptability and potential impacts; however, the processes by which students gathered data were unknown.ObjectiveThis study aims to identify the data gathering patterns of final year medical students while using eCREST and how eCREST influences the patterns.MethodsA mixed methods design was used. A trial of eCREST across 3 UK medical schools (N=148) measured the potential effects of eCREST on data gathering. A qualitative think-aloud and semistructured interview study with 16 medical students from one medical school identified 3 data gathering strategies: Thorough, Focused, and Succinct. Some had no strategy. Reanalysis of the trial data identified the prevalence of data gathering patterns and compared patterns between the intervention and control groups. Patterns were identified based on 2 variables that were measured in a patient case 1 month after the intervention: the proportion of Essential information students identified and the proportion of irrelevant information gathered (Relevant). Those who scored in the top 3 quartiles for Essential but in the lowest quartile for Relevant displayed a Thorough pattern. Those who scored in the top 3 quartiles for Relevant but in the lowest quartile for Essential displayed a Succinct pattern. Those who scored in the top 3 quartiles on both variables displayed a Focused pattern. Those whose scores were in the lowest quartile on both variables displayed a Nonspecific pattern.ResultsThe trial results indicated that students in the intervention group were more thorough than those in the control groups when gathering data. The qualitative data identified data gathering strategies and the mechanisms by which eCREST influenced data gathering. Students reported that eCREST promoted thoroughness by prompting them to continuously reflect and allowing them to practice managing uncertainty. However, some found eCREST to be less useful, and they randomly gathered information. Reanalysis of the trial data revealed that the intervention group was significantly more likely to display a Thorough data gathering pattern than controls (21/78, 27% vs 6/70, 9%) and less likely to display a Succinct pattern (13/78, 17% vs 20/70, 29%; χ23=9.9; P=.02). Other patterns were similar across groups.ConclusionsQualitative data suggested that students applied a range of data gathering strategies while using eCREST and that eCREST encouraged thoroughness by continuously prompting the students to reflect and manage their uncertainty. Trial data suggested that eCREST led students to demonstrate more Thorough data gathering patterns. Virtual patients that encourage thoroughness could help future physicians avoid missed diagnostic opportunities and enhance the delivery of clinical reasoning teaching.

Project description:Introduction: Economic topics appear in the medical studies curriculum at different times. Despite socio-political relevance, there is hardly any information about the degree of understanding that medical students have of "economics in medicine". The present study addresses the questions: What understanding of "economics in medicine" do medical students have before the start of the Practical Year? To what extent is economic teaching content understood as "economization" from outside the profession? Method: Magdeburg medical students in the 5th year of study, who participated in preparatory seminars for the Practical Year (PY) in 2014 and 2015 (60 participants each), assessed the relevance of various seminar topics four months prior to the start of the semester. On the basis of a three-stage qualitative-reconstructive partial evaluation, students' economic understanding is explored through secondary analysis: deductive derivation of the analysis units; integrative basic method ("segmentation", "micro-linguistic detailed analysis", "central theme"); development of a theoretical model by placing the central themes in context following Grounded Theory. Results: Based on the theory, 19 free-text answers with economic reference were identified from the total of all free-text answers. Each answer was assigned to at least one of a total of six themes of the students' understanding of economics: de-professionalizing economization, deciding and working economically, ambivalent requirements for efficiency and equity, the doctor as an entrepreneur, economics as relevant learning content, PY as a conflict-laden setting for economized working and learning. The theoretical model contains social, praxeological and professional references, which can themselves be ambivalent and conflicting. Conclusion: Despite their critical attitude, the surveyed medical students are neither hostile to economics nor do they regard economics in medicine as a taboo subject. Economic learning content is recognized as relevant. Educational formats that tackle the tension between patient and system orientation in a problem-oriented manner can be a productive setting for economic reflection.

Project description:Background Plastic surgery has developed to benefit in a variety of challenging areas formerly handled by other disciplines. Medical students do not have a clear picture of plastic surgery as a career due to lacking scope, clinical practice, and understanding of plastic surgery as a clinical area of expertise, including general practitioners, nursing staff, medical trainees, and the general public, and misconceptions about the extent of reconstructive and plastic surgery. Methods A cross-sectional observational study was conducted on Kuwait University Medical students (2nd-7th Years) over a period of 1 month. A questionnaire and a consent form were provided to eligible students. The inclusion criteria were Kuwait University Medical students from 2nd to 7th Years with signed consent form. The response was collected via email sent in coordination with the Vice Dean of Student Affairs in the Faculty of Medicine. Using statistical package for the social sciences, responses were statistically analyzed. Pearson's chi-square test was used to calculate p -values, where p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 244 eligible medical students, 121 males and 123 females, were included in the study, with a mean age of 21 (±2) years. Similarly, 126 (51.6%) were preclinical students (2nd-4th-year students), while 118 (48.4%) were clinical students (5th-7th-year students). About 79.8% of medical students believed that plastic surgery plays an essential role in trauma management, whereas 9.2% did not consider plastic surgery significant for trauma management. This study found that only 15.5% of medical students were interested in enrolling in plastic surgery residency after graduation, while 47.1% of students did not consider plastic surgery residency after graduation. However, 37.4% were uncertain. The two most driving factors in deciding on plastic surgery residency were expected income (61.8%) and lifestyle (14.3%). Conclusion Improving medical students' education quality can enhance their perception and awareness of plastic surgery. Students should be taught the broader scope of plastic surgery. The inclusion of formal training during undergraduation is the essence of time and should be added to or improved during plastic surgery rotations with more emphasis on reconstructive and hand/peripheral nerve surgery. Student-led interest groups can be a useful tool for educating students about their specialty.

Project description:Objectives: Physicians with different professional backgrounds often diagnose a patients' problem collaboratively. In this article, we first introduce a process model for collaborative diagnosing (CDR model), describe the development of a simulation used to empirically examine the facilitation of collaborative diagnostic reasoning. Based on a contemporary validity framework [1], we further suggest indicators for validity and collect initial evidence with respect to the scoring, generalization, extrapolation, and implication inferences to assess the validity of the simulation when used to assess effects of learning interventions. Method: In a quasi-experimental study, we assessed objectivity and reliability of the simulation and compared medical students with low and advanced prior knowledge to practitioners with high prior knowledge with respect to their diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic efficiency, information sharing skills, and their intrinsic cognitive load. Additionally, we obtained authenticity ratings from practitioners with high prior knowledge. Results: The results yielded satisfying initial evidence for the validity of the scoring and the extrapolation inferences as ratings are objective, and the simulation and the collaborative process is perceived as rather authentic. Additionally, participants on different levels of prior knowledge differ with respect to their diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic efficiency, information sharing skills, and their reported intrinsic cognitive load. With one exception (information sharing skills), the generalization inference seems to be valid as well. Conclusions: We conclude that collecting validity evidence for the simulation was an important step towards a better interpretation of the simulation. We found that the simulation is an authentic and valid representation of the chosen collaborative situation and that the collected validity evidence offers sufficient evidence for an initial validation of the simulation. Nevertheless, the validation process highlighted some important gaps that need further consideration. We further conclude that applying a validation model to the context of empirical research is promising and encourage other researchers to follow the example.

Dataset Information

Using simulation to explore medical students' understanding of integrated care within geriatrics.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Using simulation to explore medical students' understanding of integrated care within geriatrics.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets