Dataset Information

Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density and Bone Strength: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT: Importance:Few studies have assessed the effects of daily vitamin D doses at or above the tolerable upper intake level for 12 months or greater, yet 3% of US adults report vitamin D intakes of at least 4000 IU per day. Objective:To assess the dose-dependent effect of vitamin D supplementation on volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) and strength. Design, Setting, and Participants:Three-year, double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted in a single center in Calgary, Canada, from August 2013 to December 2017, including 311 community-dwelling healthy adults without osteoporosis, aged 55 to 70 years, with baseline levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) of 30 to 125 nmol/L. Interventions:Daily doses of vitamin D3 for 3 years at 400 IU (n?=?109), 4000 IU (n?=?100), or 10?000 IU (n?=?102). Calcium supplementation was provided to participants with dietary intake of less than 1200 mg per day. Main Outcomes and Measures:Co-primary outcomes were total volumetric BMD at radius and tibia, assessed with high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, and bone strength (failure load) at radius and tibia estimated by finite element analysis. Results:Of 311 participants who were randomized (53% men; mean [SD] age, 62.2 [4.2] years), 287 (92%) completed the study. Baseline, 3-month, and 3-year levels of 25(OH)D were 76.3, 76.7, and 77.4 nmol/L for the 400-IU group; 81.3, 115.3, and 132.2 for the 4000-IU group; and 78.4, 188.0, and 144.4 for the 10?000-IU group. There were significant group?×?time interactions for volumetric BMD. At trial end, radial volumetric BMD was lower for the 4000 IU group (-3.9 mg HA/cm3 [95% CI, -6.5 to -1.3]) and 10?000 IU group (-7.5 mg HA/cm3 [95% CI, -10.1 to -5.0]) compared with the 400 IU group with mean percent change in volumetric BMD of -1.2% (400 IU group), -2.4% (4000 IU group), and -3.5% (10?000 IU group). Tibial volumetric BMD differences from the 400 IU group were -1.8 mg HA/cm3 (95% CI, -3.7 to 0.1) in the 4000 IU group and -4.1 mg HA/cm3 in the 10?000 IU group (95% CI, -6.0 to -2.2), with mean percent change values of -0.4% (400 IU), -1.0% (4000 IU), and -1.7% (10?000 IU). There were no significant differences for changes in failure load (radius, P?=?.06; tibia, P?=?.12). Conclusions and Relevance:Among healthy adults, treatment with vitamin D for 3 years at a dose of 4000 IU per day or 10?000 IU per day, compared with 400 IU per day, resulted in statistically significant lower radial BMD; tibial BMD was significantly lower only with the 10?000 IU per day dose. There were no significant differences in bone strength at either the radius or tibia. These findings do not support a benefit of high-dose vitamin D supplementation for bone health; further research would be needed to determine whether it is harmful. Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01900860.

SUBMITTER: Burt LA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6714464 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density and Bone Strength: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Burt Lauren A LA Billington Emma O EO Rose Marianne S MS Raymond Duncan A DA Hanley David A DA Boyd Steven K SK

JAMA 20190801 8

<h4>Importance</h4>Few studies have assessed the effects of daily vitamin D doses at or above the tolerable upper intake level for 12 months or greater, yet 3% of US adults report vitamin D intakes of at least 4000 IU per day.<h4>Objective</h4>To assess the dose-dependent effect of vitamin D supplementation on volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) and strength.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>Three-year, double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted in a single center in Calgary, Ca ...[more]

PMID: 31454046

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceAlthough guidelines for vitamin D supplementation in infants have been widely implemented, they are mostly based on studies focusing on prevention of rickets. The optimal dose for bone strength and infection prevention in healthy infants remains unclear.ObjectiveTo determine whether daily supplementation with 1200 IU of vitamin D3 increases bone strength or decreases incidence of infections in the first 2 years of life compared with a dosage of 400 IU/d.Design, setting, and participantsA randomized clinical trial involving a random sample of 975 healthy term infants at a maternity hospital in Helsinki, Finland. Study recruitment occurred between January 14, 2013, and June 9, 2014, and the last follow-up was May 30, 2016. Data analysis was by the intention-to-treat principle.InterventionsRandomization of 489 infants to daily oral vitamin D3 supplementation of 400 IU and 486 infants to 1200 IU from age 2 weeks to 24 months.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes were bone strength and incidence of parent-reported infections at 24 months.ResultsOf the 975 infants who were randomized, 485 (49.7%) were girls and all were of Northern European ethnicity. Eight hundred twenty-three (84.4%) completed the 24-month follow-up. We found no differences between groups in bone strength measures, including bone mineral content (mean difference, 0.4 mg/mm; 95% CI, -0.8 to 1.6), mineral density (mean difference, 2.9 mg/cm3; 95% CI, -8.3 to 14.2), cross-sectional area (mean difference, -0.9 mm2; 95% CI, -5.0 to 3.2), or polar moment of inertia (mean difference, -66.0 mm4, 95% CI, -274.3 to 142.3). Incidence rates of parent-reported infections did not differ between groups (incidence rate ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93-1.06). At birth, 914 of 955 infants (95.7%) were vitamin D sufficient (ie, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration ≥20.03 ng/mL). At 24 months, mean 25(OH)D concentration was higher in the 1200-IU group than in the 400-IU group (mean difference, 12.50 ng/mL; 95% CI, 11.22-13.78).Conclusions and relevanceA vitamin D3 supplemental dose of up to 1200 IU in infants did not lead to increased bone strength or to decreased infection incidence. Daily supplementation with 400 IU vitamin D3 seems adequate in maintaining vitamin D sufficiency in children younger than 2 years.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01723852.

Project description:Low serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations are associated with increased hip fracture risk and decreased femoral areal bone mineral density (BMD) among elderly men. Structural dimensions of the proximal femur and volumetric BMD in cortical and trabecular compartments are also associated with hip fracture risk. However, associations of volumetric BMD or structural dimensions with serum 25(OH)D concentrations among older men remain unclear. In a random sample of 1608 men aged ?65 years from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS), baseline serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry assays. Femoral neck geometry and volumetric BMD derived from quantitative computed tomography included integral, cortical, and trabecular volumetric BMD; cross-sectional area; integral and cortical volume; and cortical volume as a percent of integral volume. We studied 888 men with vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), femoral neck geometry, and BMD measures. Whole-bone femoral strength and load-strength ratio from finite element (FE) analysis were also available for 356 men from this sample. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate least square means of each femoral measure within quartiles of 25(OH)D adjusted for age, race, body mass index, height, latitude, and season of blood draw. Tests of linear trend in the means were performed across increasing quartile of serum 25(OH)D levels. Mean cortical volume (p trend?=?0.006) and cortical volume as a percent of integral volume (p trend?<?0.001) increased across increasing quartile of 25(OH)D level. However, overall femoral neck size (area and integral volume) did not vary by 25(OH)D level. Femoral neck volumetric BMD measures increased in a graded manner with higher 25(OH)D levels (p trend?<?0.001). Femoral strength, but not load-strength ratio, increased with increasing 25(OH)D. Adjustment for PTH did not materially change these associations. We conclude that in older men, higher levels of endogenous 25(OH)D may increase whole-bone strength by increasing femoral volumetric BMD and cortical volume.

Project description:There is controversy over whether African Americans have higher vitamin D requirements than recommended by the Institute of Medicine. We previously reported that maintaining serum 25(OH)D above 30 ng/mL does not prevent age-related bone loss. Herein, we report that bone strength is also unaffected by maintaining this level in this population.IntroductionThe role of vitamin D in bone strength has not been investigated in the African American (AA) population.MethodsA 3-year randomized controlled trial was designed to examine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on physical performance, bone loss, and bone strength in healthy older AA women. A total of 260 postmenopausal AA women, ages ≥ 60 years were randomized to a vitamin D3 or placebo arm. Vitamin D3 dose was adjusted to maintain serum 25OHD > 30 ng/mL. Bone mineral density, femoral axis length, and femoral neck (FN) width were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Composite indices of FN strength [compression strength index (CSI), bending strength index (BSI), and impact strength index (ISI)] were computed.ResultsThe mean age of participants was 68.2 ± 4.9 years. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar. The average dose of vitamin D3 was 3490 ± 1465 IU/day in the active group. The mean serum 25OHD was 46.8 ± 1.2 ng/mL versus 20.7 ± 1.1 ng/mL in the active versus placebo group. Serum 25OHD did not correlate with any composite indices. The longitudinal differences observed in FN width, CSI, BSI, and ISI in both groups were not statistically significant (all p values > 0.05). Further, there was no group × time interaction effect for any of the composite indices (all p values > 0.05).ConclusionMaintaining serum 25OHD > 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L) does not affect bone strength in older AA women. There is no evidence to support vitamin D intake greater than the recommended RDA by the Institute of Medicine in this population for bone strength.

Project description:ImportanceAs men age, they experience decreased serum testosterone concentrations, decreased bone mineral density (BMD), and increased risk of fracture.ObjectiveTo determine whether testosterone treatment of older men with low testosterone increases volumetric BMD (vBMD) and estimated bone strength.Design, setting, and participantsPlacebo-controlled, double-blind trial with treatment allocation by minimization at 9 US academic medical centers of men 65 years or older with 2 testosterone concentrations averaging less than 275 ng/L participating in the Testosterone Trials from December 2011 to June 2014. The analysis was a modified intent-to-treat comparison of treatment groups by multivariable linear regression adjusted for balancing factors as required by minimization.InterventionsTestosterone gel, adjusted to maintain the testosterone level within the normal range for young men, or placebo gel for 1 year.Main outcomes and measuresSpine and hip vBMD was determined by quantitative computed tomography at baseline and 12 months. Bone strength was estimated by finite element analysis of quantitative computed tomography data. Areal BMD was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 12 months.ResultsThere were 211 participants (mean [SD] age, 72.3 [5.9] years; 86% white; mean [SD] body mass index, 31.2 [3.4]). Testosterone treatment was associated with significantly greater increases than placebo in mean spine trabecular vBMD (7.5%; 95% CI, 4.8% to 10.3% vs 0.8%; 95% CI, -1.9% to 3.4%; treatment effect, 6.8%; 95% CI, 4.8%-8.7%; P < .001), spine peripheral vBMD, hip trabecular and peripheral vBMD, and mean estimated strength of spine trabecular bone (10.8%; 95% CI, 7.4% to 14.3% vs 2.4%; 95% CI, -1.0% to 5.7%; treatment effect, 8.5%; 95% CI, 6.0%-10.9%; P < .001), spine peripheral bone, and hip trabecular and peripheral bone. The estimated strength increases were greater in trabecular than peripheral bone and greater in the spine than hip. Testosterone treatment increased spine areal BMD but less than vBMD.Conclusions and relevanceTestosterone treatment for 1 year of older men with low testosterone significantly increased vBMD and estimated bone strength, more in trabecular than peripheral bone and more in the spine than hip. A larger, longer trial could determine whether this treatment also reduces fracture risk.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00799617.

Project description:ImportanceVitamin D may be important for neurodevelopment. The optimal daily dose of vitamin D for early brain development is not known.ObjectivesTo test whether a higher (1200 IU) vs standard (400 IU) dose of vitamin D3 has beneficial effects on neurodevelopment in the first 2 years of life and whether serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration is associated with neurodevelopment.Design, setting, and participantsThis double-blind, interventional randomized clinical trial involved healthy infants born full-term between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, at a maternity hospital in Helsinki, Finland, at the 60th northern latitude. Two-year follow-up was conducted by May 30, 2016. Data analysis was by the intention-to-treat principle. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2020, to May 31, 2021.InterventionsRandomization of 404 infants to receive 400 IU of oral vitamin D3 supplementation daily and 397 infants to receive 1200 IU of oral vitamin D3 supplementation daily from 2 weeks to 24 months of age.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes were child total developmental milestone scores at 12 and 24 months of age measured using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (total score is calculated as a mean of the 5 subscale scores: total score range, 0-60, where 0 indicates delay in all developmental domains and 60 indicates that the child can master all age-specific skills) as well as externalizing, internalizing, and dysregulation problems and competencies scores at 24 months measured using the Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (range 0-2, where 0 indicates no problems or no competencies and 2 indicates a high level of problems or a high level of competencies; variables were standardized to the mean [SD] of 0 [1]). Secondary outcomes were specific skills, problems, and competencies derived from these questionnaires.ResultsOf the 987 families recruited, 495 children were randomly assigned to receive 400 IU of vitamin D3, and 492 children were randomly assigned to receive 1200 IU of vitamin D3. A total of 801 families participated in the follow-up at 12 and/or 24 months, with 404 children (207 girls [51.2%]) in the 400-IU group and 397 children (198 girls [49.9%]) in the 1200-IU group. All children were of Northern European ethnicity. No differences were found between the 400-IU group and the 1200-IU group in the mean (SD) adjusted Ages and Stages Questionnaire total score at 12 months (45.0 [7.1] vs 46.2 [7.9]; mean difference [MD], 1.17 [95% CI, -0.06 to 2.38]) or 24 months (50.9 [5.3] vs 51.5 [5.5]; MD, 0.48 [95% CI, -0.40 to 1.36]). No differences were found between the 400-IU group and the 1200-IU group at 24 months in the mean (SD) adjusted Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment externalizing domain score (-0.07 [1.00] vs 0.07 [0.98]; MD, 0.15 [95% CI, -0.01 to 0.31]), internalizing domain score (0.04 [1.06] vs -0.02 [0.98]; MD, -0.07 [95% CI, -0.24 to 0.1.0]), dysregulation domain score (-0.00 [1.04] vs 0.02 [0.96]; MD, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.14 to 0.18]), or competencies score (-0.02 [1.02] vs 0.01 [1.02]; MD, 0.03 [95% CI, -0.13 to 0.20]). The 1200-IU group did have a higher risk in the adjusted model of scoring 1.5 SDs or more on the externalizing domain score (odds ratio, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.19-4.56]; P = .01). Levels of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D were not associated with the primary outcomes.Conclusions and relevanceHigher-than-standard vitamin D3 doses provide no systematic benefits for child neurodevelopment up to 2 years of age. However, the potential disadvantageous effects of higher doses could not be fully excluded; even if minimal, the potential nonbeneficial effects of higher-than-standard doses warrant further studies in which both safety and benefits should be evaluated.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01723852.

Dataset Information

Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density and Bone Strength: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Publications

Effect of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation on Volumetric Bone Density and Bone Strength: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets