Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ambu AuraGain and i-gel in Young Pediatric Patients.


ABSTRACT: Supraglottic airway devices have been increasingly used because of their several advantages. Previous studies showed that the small-sized i-gel provides effective ventilation for young pediatric patients; however, few studies have reported the use of AuraGain in these patients. Herein, we compared the clinical performance of AuraGain and i-gel in young pediatric patients aged between 6 months and 6 years old and weighing 5-20 kg, who were scheduled to undergo extremity surgery under general anesthesia. In total, 68 patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups: AuraGain group and i-gel group. The primary outcome was the requirement of additional airway maneuvers. We also analyzed insertion parameters, fiberoptic bronchoscopic view, oropharyngeal leak pressure, and peri-operative adverse effects. Compared with the AuraGain group, the i-gel group required more additional airway maneuvers during the placement of the device and maintenance of ventilation. The fiberoptic view was better in the AuraGain group than in the i-gel group. However, the oropharyngeal leak pressure was higher in the i-gel group. AuraGain might be a better choice over i-gel considering the requirement of additional airway maneuvers. However, when a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure is required, the i-gel is more beneficial than AuraGain.

SUBMITTER: Kim HJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6723277 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Ambu AuraGain and i-gel in Young Pediatric Patients.

Kim Ha-Jung HJ   Park Hee-Sun HS   Kim Soo-Young SY   Ro Young-Jin YJ   Yang Hong-Seuk HS   Koh Won Uk WU  

Journal of clinical medicine 20190816 8


Supraglottic airway devices have been increasingly used because of their several advantages. Previous studies showed that the small-sized i-gel provides effective ventilation for young pediatric patients; however, few studies have reported the use of AuraGain in these patients. Herein, we compared the clinical performance of AuraGain and i-gel in young pediatric patients aged between 6 months and 6 years old and weighing 5-20 kg, who were scheduled to undergo extremity surgery under general anes  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5447208 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7713828 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4590561 | biostudies-other
2021-10-04 | GSE141478 | GEO
| S-EPMC6458833 | biostudies-literature
2022-06-20 | GSE192587 | GEO
2024-07-10 | MSV000095296 | MassIVE
2024-06-13 | PXD046061 | Pride
| S-EPMC2438565 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC2131748 | biostudies-literature