Dataset Information

Impact of biomarkers and genetic profiling on breast cancer prognostication: A comparative analysis of the 8th edition of breast cancer staging system.

ABSTRACT: The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging guidelines combine traditional TNM system with biomarkers to reflect our current understanding of tumor biology and targeted therapy. In this study, we investigated the impact of the TNM + Biomarkers staging system and the additive value of Oncotype Dx™ genomic profile recurrence score (RS) (TNM + Biomarkers+RS <11) for the staging of breast cancer (BC) using data from two tertiary referral cancer centers. Compared to TNM alone, the TNM + Biomarkers system changed the stage group in 32.7% of BCs (27% downstage, 5.7% upstage). Most (98.3%) of the downstaged BCs were estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR)+, whereas 78% of the upstaged BCs were ER-/PR-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-. Compared to TNM + Biomarkers staging, the addition of genetic profile data (TNM + Biomarker+RS <11) downstaged only <1% BCs. Our analysis suggests that for T1-T2N0 ER+/HER2- BCs, Oncotype Dx™ RS <11 provides added value as a staging parameter only in a very small group of cases compared to TNM + Biomarkers alone.

SUBMITTER: Yoon EC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6754291 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of biomarkers and genetic profiling on breast cancer prognostication: A comparative analysis of the 8th edition of breast cancer staging system.

Yoon Esther C EC Schwartz Christopher C Brogi Edi E Ventura Katia K Wen Hannah H Darvishian Farbod F

The breast journal 20190613 5

The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging guidelines combine traditional TNM system with biomarkers to reflect our current understanding of tumor biology and targeted therapy. In this study, we investigated the impact of the TNM + Biomarkers staging system and the additive value of Oncotype Dx™ genomic profile recurrence score (RS) (TNM + Biomarkers+RS <11) for the staging of breast cancer (BC) using data from two tertiary referral cancer centers. Compared to TNM a ...[more]

PMID: 31197914

Similar Datasets

Project description:The aim of our study was to explore the value of the 8th edition TNM staging system on evaluating the prognosis of colorectal carcinoid. Colorectal carcinoid patients between 1988 and 2015 were selected in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database for analysis. About 4286 patients with colorectal carcinoid tumors were identified, of which were carcinoid tumor NOS (n = 1726), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) (n = 1346) and other carcinoid tumor (OCT) (n = 591). Worsening 10-year CSS rates with increasing N status, M status, and SEER historic stage were demonstrated across all three above groups (all P < .05). In carcinoid tumor NOS, significant differences in CSS were found with increasing combined 8th AJCC stages (P < .001), except for that between stage II and stage III (10-year CSS rate: 82.6% vs 84.3%, P = .68). While combined 8th TNM stage in NEC and OTC exhibited greater separations in CSS despite on-going overlaps between groups. For carcinoid tumor NOS, stage II (HR = 3.37; 95% CI: 0.97-11.76), and stage III (HR = 2.09; 95% CI: 0.51-8.66) conferred no significant difference in CSS compared with stage I, while stage IV had an increasing HR of 5.09 (95% CI: 1.08-24.08). Although combined 8th AJCC stage had a good ability to distinguish 10-year CSS of patients with NEC or OCT, detailed 8th AJCC stage did not seem to be applicable. Detailed 8th AJCC categories of advanced stages in all the three groups conferred increased HRs with overlapping CIs. However, in the early and middle status, HRs did not increase with the increase of stages, or there was no difference in HRs between adjacent stages. Combined 8th TNM stage was not practical for judging the survival outcomes of colorectal carcinoid tumor NOS, especially in patients with stages II and III, but it provided useful prognostic information for NEC and OCT. However, for all carcinoid tumors, the prognostic values of detailed 8th AJCC stage were not enough accurate in the clinic. More optimized staging methods should be developed and validated in the future.

Dataset Information

Impact of biomarkers and genetic profiling on breast cancer prognostication: A comparative analysis of the 8th edition of breast cancer staging system.

Publications

Impact of biomarkers and genetic profiling on breast cancer prognostication: A comparative analysis of the 8th edition of breast cancer staging system.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets